Why Iran hesitates to directly take on Israel

Netanyahu is trying to drag Tehran into direct conflict, and Iranians' 'strategic patience' is running out. Will he finally get what he wants? Time will tell.

Iran’s Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf (C) waves as he returns to his car after visiting the site of an Israeli airstrike that targeted Beirut’s Basta neighbourhood on October 12, 2024.
AFP
Iran’s Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf (C) waves as he returns to his car after visiting the site of an Israeli airstrike that targeted Beirut’s Basta neighbourhood on October 12, 2024.

Why Iran hesitates to directly take on Israel

Over the past four decades, Iran has steadily expanded its influence by cementing its control over several Arab capitals through its network of proxy groups. Tehran has led, nurtured, and trained these groups, amplifying their sectarian and separatist tendencies to position itself as a formidable force in the region. During this time, it has threatened the security and stability of neighbouring countries to challenge the United States and Israel and use this as leverage to help it advance its own interests.

This approach is not unique to Iran. Nations often prefer to wage their battles indirectly, using proxies rather than their own military forces to minimise the cost to their own people.

The most important cogs in Iran's proxy network machine have been Hezbollah in Lebanon and the Palestinian movements Hamas and Islamic Jihad. These groups won Iran significant influence in the region, handing it the reins of the Palestinian cause and positioning it as Israel's staunchest adversary. These groups have borne the brunt of the violence, fighting and sacrificing on Tehran's behalf, leaving Iran to reap the political and strategic benefits.

However, since 7 October last year and Hamas’ Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, Israel has dragged Iran out of its comfort zone into the arena of direct conflict. Israel has actively attacked Iran's interests and strategic assets, both in and outside its borders. It dealt Iran massive blows, not only to its personnel but also to its overall morale, when it took out some of the iconic leaders of the so-called "resistance axis". First, Israel assassinated Ismail Haniyeh, Hamas's political bureau chief in Tehran. Two months later, it took out Hezbollah's secretary-general, Hassan Nasrallah, in Beirut's southern suburb of Dahiyeh, shaking Iran's regional strategy to the core.

Reasons for reluctance

Despite having launched two rounds of missile strikes against Israel, Iran appears to be entrenching itself within its borders, relying primarily on its proxy forces and remaining reluctant to engage in a direct war with Israel.

Read more: Direct clashes with Israel puts Iran's survival at risk

Iran understands that a direct confrontation with Israel means it would have to take on a US-led coalition

Following the sustained and significant losses it has suffered, there is a growing movement within Iran to pursue war over diplomacy. Conservative circles argue that Iran's strategic patience doctrine has backfired. Not only has it failed to deter Israel or curb its provocations, but it has emboldened it to attack Iran and its proxies far more aggressively.

Iran is acutely aware that a direct confrontation with Israel would not be a battle against Israel alone but against a broader coalition that includes the United States and some European countries. And although Russia is said to be an ally of Iran, it is not quite clear how much support it would give Tehran if a larger war broke out—if at all.

Another reason for Iran's restraint relates to the upcoming US presidential election. Iran is keenly aware that escalating regional tensions and the existential threat posed by the war on Israel could not only benefit Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu but also potentially pave the way for Donald Trump's return to the White House. After all, it was Trump who withdrew from the nuclear deal and reimposed stringent international sanctions when he was president. His re-election would likely diminish Iran's strategic position even further.

Given these pressing realities, Israel appears emboldened to continue dealing blows to Tehran's network of regional proxies without serious concern of a massive Iranian attack against it. And there are no signs that Israel will slow down. Netanyahu has given several speeches indicating that the war has only just started.

Iran's options at this stage look very bleak.

font change

Related Articles