The outbreak of military conflict for power over Sudan has reignited familiar factors that have dragged the nation into destitution, indebtedness, and economic collapse.
Read more: Explainer: Why are military forces fighting each other in Sudan?
Khartoum has clearly reneged on its pledge to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to establish civilian rule, in a failing of leadership with enormous economic and social consequences.
It comes when help was supposed to be on the way. The IMF and the World Bank offered assistance two years ago after top-level meetings in Washington.
Eligibility for the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries Initiative (HIPC) was conditional on promises for reform, covering political stability, reduced poverty rates, economic growth and improved living standards.
There were also supposed to be moves towards better human rights and more freedom for the 48 million people inhabiting the country’s 1.88 million square kilometres, who are constantly threatened by food crises, despite having vast agricultural areas and access to freshwater resources from the Nile, which flows from Ethiopia in the south to Egypt in the north.
Political instability, successive military coups, and civil wars have prevented Sudan from reaping the benefits of its natural resources. It is one of the poorest Arab and African countries, with an annual per capita income of around $751 according to 2022 World Bank statistics.
Continued armed conflicts in regions including Darfur, South Kordofan and Blue Nile have meant losses in economic development estimated at around $500 billion. International lenders consider Sudan to be in, in effect, bankrupt.