Sights on Syria: is Türkiye taking over where Iran left off?

As Iranian influence recedes, Tel Aviv turns its attention towards Ankara. As the two regional powers stake their interests, Syria could become their chosen battleground

Sights on Syria: is Türkiye taking over where Iran left off?

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s objection to Washington supplying Türkiye with F-35 fighter jets went far beyond a dispute over an arms deal. US President Donald Trump’s praise for Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan at the NATO Summit in Ankara this month carried greater significance than routine diplomatic courtesy and will have irked Netanyahu considerably.

Türkiye and Israel have entered a new phase of regional rivalry. Syria, which lies between them, has therefore become its foremost arena. For decades during the Syrian Assad regime, Iran was the principal foreign sponsor and meddler. Now Türkiye has influence in Damascus, where once Tehran held court. Has Türkiye become ‘the new Iran’ in Syria? The comparison may strike many as provocative, yet it does no less than reflect a profound shift in Israeli strategic thinking.

With Iran and its once-powerful Lebanese proxy Hezbollah both weakened, and with the Assad regime an increasingly distant memory, Türkiye has emerged as Israel’s ‘new enemy’ in the region. Under Assad, Syria served as an arena of confrontation between Tel Aviv and Tehran, while Ankara remained preoccupied with Kurds in northern Syria. Today, it is not Tel Aviv and Tehran facing off in Syria, but Tel Aviv and Ankara.

Different interests

Neither side seeks war, which they know would be extremely costly, but neither looks like backing down. Trump, who considers himself close to both Netanyahu and Erdoğan, does not want two of his closest Middle East allies to fight, but the Turks and the Israelis have very different interests in Syria, which both see as a strategically vital neighbour.

Türkiye’s security begins with the stability, unity, and territorial integrity of the Syrian state, and with preventing a Kurdish entity along its southern frontier. Economically, Türkiye sees Syria as a gateway to integration, a corridor for energy and trade, and a way of reshaping its regional influence. Erdoğan has supported the new Syrian administration led by President Ahmed al-Sharaa from an early stage, building a deep and multifaceted partnership with Damascus.

With Iran and Hezbollah weakened, and with the Assad regime an increasingly distant memory, Türkiye is Israel's 'new enemy' in the region

While Israel does not oppose the emergence of a stable Syrian state in principle, it worries that such stability could, in time, lead to a military strength capable of restricting Israel's freedom of action. That is why Israel destroyed Syrian military assets in the hours after Bashar al-Assad fled the country on a plane to Russia.

It is also why Israel has continued to conduct airstrikes, expand its occupation in southern Syria, provide cover for the Druze community of Suweida, and react with acute sensitivity to any suggestion of Turkish military bases, air-defence systems, or the reconstruction of the Syrian army in ways that could alter the balance of power along Israel's frontier. Netanyahu also intervened with Russia's Vladimir Putin to prevent Damascus from obtaining advanced Russian weapons and air-defence systems.

A wider tussle

This is where the Turkish and Israeli visions collide. Türkiye supports the consolidation, sovereignty, and unity of the Syrian state; Israel sees those same developments as a threat. Measures described by Tel Aviv as "defensive" are seen in Damascus and Ankara as violations of Syrian sovereignty and as blows to the prospects of stabilising the new state.

The rivalry over Syria is only one part of a wider tussle encompassing the eastern Mediterranean, energy routes, maritime corridors, and defence industries. Türkiye is a rising regional power and a member of both NATO and the G20, while Israel seeks to preserve its regional superiority and prevent the challenge of competitors. So will Türkiye become 'the new Iran' in Syria?

It seems unlikely. Türkiye's project, instruments, and alliances differ fundamentally from Iran's. Moreover, the new Syria, and the region more broadly, do not view the Iranian and Israeli projects in the same light. Syrians themselves also hold markedly different attitudes towards Turks and Israelis.

The United States remains the most influential force in checking this rivalry. The danger in the Middle East is that wars do not always begin with a deliberate political decision; they often arise from miscalculation. A single air strike, military deployment, or misjudgement on the ground may be enough to ignite a crisis that no-one wants.

font change