Oil, stock markets remain stable amid Israel-Iran war...so far

Analysts warn that if the US becomes involved and the conflict widens into a regional war, a more volatile reaction would be likely

The US Navy's aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower transits the Strait of Hormuz on November 26, 2023.
AFP
The US Navy's aircraft carrier USS Dwight D. Eisenhower transits the Strait of Hormuz on November 26, 2023.

Oil, stock markets remain stable amid Israel-Iran war...so far

On global financial markets, the reaction to escalating tensions in the Middle East and the direct military confrontation between Israel and Iran has so far been contained, following an initial bout of volatility in the main international oil price.

Brent crude jumped to a five-month high of over $78 per barrel, spiking by as much as 13% in a single session, when news of Israeli air strikes first broke. It then eased back to trade in a range between $76 and $77, where it has since remained.

It leaves Brent notably below the multi-year highs it touched over $130 in 2022, when Russia’s invasion of Ukraine roiled markets and higher energy prices sent a wave of upward inflationary pressure around the world.

Clay Seigle, senior fellow for energy security at the Centre for Strategic and International Studies, told Al Majalla: “Only in the case of a significant disruption in the Middle East and the Gulf would oil prices surge back to triple-digit territory. An outage of Iran’s 1.5 million barrels per day in exports alone would not be sufficient to cause such a price spike.”

Global stock and bond markets have also held their nerve, with major indices from London and Frankfurt to New York and Shanghai able to post modest overall gains in steady trade.

There are hopes that this will mean the conflict is contained at the current level of engagement, without either US action and the subsequent risk of Iranian reprisals on American military bases in the Middle East, but investors and analysts are keeping a close watch for any signs of escalation.

Michelle Thompson.

Read more: What would happen if Iran closed the Strait of Hormuz?

Strait through

There had been concerns that Iran might attempt to close the Strait of Hormuz—a key maritime chokepoint off the shores of Iran, through which around a fifth of global crude oil exports. But a heavy international naval presence would pose a significant challenge to any moves to shut it down.

While the United Kingdom’s navy has noted some interference in navigation signals, tanker traffic is flowing through freely. Smooth and sustained supply through the strait will help limit price volatility.

James Swanston, senior emerging markets economist at Capital Economics, admits there is “a clear upside risk to oil prices if there is a major escalation if Iran's oil export infrastructure is damaged and/or the Strait of Hormuz is closed”, but says the moves in prices so far suggest that those fears—of the latter in particular—are not as high, because the feeling is that Iran has sustained enough military hits that render it too weak to shut down the strait.

The Joint Maritime Information Centre said it expects the average monthly commercial traffic through the Strait of Hormuz to remain intact despite concerns over a potential closure.

 The fact that there are so many unknown variables means that the cost of escalation is very difficult to predict.

Boosted oil production

OPEC and its allies agreed to boost production by 411,000 barrels a day in May, June and July, a bigger-than-expected increase. Saudi Arabia, OPEC's leading member and largest producer, has backed the move to protect its market share from members failing to meet the agreed-upon production limits, and further action could follow.

However, they are unlikely to be sufficient to offset the impact of an escalating conflict or the closure of the Strait of Hormuz. And according to Seigle, there are doubts about the actual impact of the moves on supply.

"It's not clear that OPEC's recent increases to target production levels have put more oil than expected onto the global market," he says.

"More important is the 3 to 4 million barrels per day of spare production capacity held by OPEC+ and especially Saudi Arabia. This is more than enough to cover an outage of Iran's exports, but not nearly enough to mitigate a major disruption from the Gulf."

"Moreover, Saudi Arabia's spare capacity is upstream of the Strait of Hormuz, a potential flashpoint, and the alternate route to Red Sea terminals can handle only a fraction of its normal export volume."

Then there is another major source of uncertainty: US President Donald Trump. When asked on Wednesday if he was going to order an attack on Iran, he said, "I may do it. I may not do it."

His statements on the conflict have been erratic throughout. In just days, he has been open to holding more talks with Iran and then rejected the possibility, implying he is moving closer to direct military action. The Iranian government has insisted it would retaliate if that happened. 

Last-minute decision

The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump told senior aides late on Tuesday that he had approved attack plans, but was holding off on giving the final order to see if Tehran would abandon its nuclear programme. The latest message out of the White House was that Trump would decide on America's next course of action in two weeks' time. And the US president told reporters in the Oval Office on Thursday, "I have ideas as to what to do, but I haven't made a final (decision)— I like to make the final decision one second before it's due, because things change, especially with war," he said.

Should things escalate, Seigle says there is a reasonable chance energy prices could be spared from massive spikes.

"If oil/LNG tankers come under sporadic attack, but flows continue, then prices will rise moderately as shipping costs escalate and some participants suspend operations in the region," he said, adding, "The severe price reaction scenario is one in which Hormuz traffic is halted altogether, and/or Gulf export volumes are drastically reduced, for example from an attack on an export facility."

"The market will be sceptical; however, in the most recent case of Saudi Aramco's Abqaiq facility attacked in 2019, the damage was repaired very quickly."

The Middle East could end up proving to be a more stable place than many fear, but real risk remains. The fact that there are so many unknown variables means that the cost of escalation is very difficult to predict.

font change