Omar El Akkad strips away the West’s moral failure over Gaza

Full of rage, the Canadian-Egyptian writer spares no one in his latest book, especially America's progressives, whose professed values should have them as riled as the author is over Israel's genocide

Omar El Akkad strips away the West’s moral failure over Gaza

Anyone living in America these days will have noticed the rift between the White House and the US public over Israel’s war on Gaza, exacerbated by the administration’s refusal to call it what it is: genocide. Rather than acting to halt the violence, the US government has instead offered unconditional support to the perpetrators.

Doing so contradicts the human values that America has long professed to uphold and defend, values it has frequently invoked to justify its own military interventions. Such double standards are no stranger to Canadian-Egyptian writer and journalist Omar El Akkad, who has spent many years living in North America.

His journalistic career led him to cover Afghanistan, Guantanamo Bay, the Arab world, and various domestic issues, including racial injustice in the United States, all of which shaped his perspective. He used that perspective, as well as his experience of moving from Egypt to Canada via Qatar, to write his debut novel, American War, published in 2017.

A speculative work that imagines a second American Civil War in the not-too-distant future, the novel earned critical acclaim. He followed it with What Strange Paradise (2021), tracing the fate of a Syrian boy who alone survives a sinking refugee boat, in a book that exposes the moral collapse of the modern world.

When it is too late

On 25 October 2023, with Israel pounding Gaza, El Akkad posted a tweet that garnered more than ten million views: “One day, when it is safe, when naming things truthfully carries no personal risk, and when it is far too late to hold anyone accountable, everyone will claim they had always been against it.” Sure enough, his latest book is called One Day, Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This.

In it, El Akkad explores what it means to live in the West today and, more broadly, in a world dominated by a small group of powerful nations, through the lens of the war in Gaza. It is full of piercing insights, a bitter and disillusioned tone permeating the prose.

A letter of rupture with the West, it reflects the scenes witnessed on American streets and university campuses, as well as across Europe. But unlike chants or protest slogans, El Akkad’s work takes the form of a long, ice-cold yet blistering meditation, his irrefutable arguments and sharp analysis cutting like a blade.

“This book is for me,” wrote American literary critic Sarah Trembath, writing in The Washington Independent Review of Books: “It is a pristine lamentation, a mirror, and—for humanitarian activists of the literary type—an amplification of our cry.” El Akkad’s audience, she added, is “the liberal, the person who knows better than to tacitly condone mass atrocity but has said nothing”.

El Akkad's work takes the form of ice-cold yet blistering meditation, his irrefutable arguments and sharp analysis cutting like a blade

Sparing no one

El Akkad seeks not just to challenge progressives, but to urge all American readers to stop seeing the victims in Gaza as strangers, but to recognise them as brothers in our shared humanity. Yet instead of bridges, there are chasms.

In his first book, El Akkad sought to bridge the cognitive gap between America and the Middle East. In his latest work, The New York Times described him as "raging against the widening of that gulf (and) the way, at least in official discourse, the immense suffering of civilians in Gaza... is kept at bay, confined to the outer darkness of things that happen to people who are not quite human".

His book spares no one, certainly not the powerful, yet El Akkad takes particular aim at Western progressives, those with "the ironic smile of someone who recognises the ugliness of the project they've joined, yet lacks the courage to walk away from it," even as "the corpses pile up at their doorstep".

Today's neoliberal societies are marked by "the gap between their noble ideals and their bloody reality

Omar El Akkad, Egyptian-Canadian writer

Today's neoliberal societies are marked by "the gap between their noble ideals and their bloody reality," he says, before extending his critique to the Western media, which he sees as having forsaken its responsibility to accurately report on what is happening in Gaza, opting instead for a thoroughly biased narrative.

He dissects the language used, not least its "anaesthetising expressions" and "twisted rhetorical constructs," such as a characterisation in The Guardian of starving civilians gunned down by Israeli forces while searching for flour as "deaths linked to food aid".

Western literary institutions have questions to answer, he suggests, not least those that cancelled readings by Palestinian authors and banned mention of Gaza at award ceremonies. "Any institution that prefers receiving cheques over condemning evil transforms from a literary or artistic body into a reputation-laundering corporation."

Omar El Akkad

Fury at the silence

He has now begun to question the value of journalistic writing—something he has long held dear—and struggles to occupy the professional spaces he once navigated with ease. "What is this work we're doing?" he asks himself. "What purpose do we serve? What flaw within me prevents me from continuing with life as normal? And what flaw in all those others allows them to do so?"

El Akkad vents his fury at silence, not the silence born of indifference or cowardice, but the failure of language itself to adequately confront and articulate the genocide in Gaza. At its core, this is an excavation of "the dark depths of a collective consciousness shaped by the need to flee from daily evidence of the disasters we are mired in".

For novelist and journalist Dina Nayeri, One Day is "passionate, poetic, and sickening… full of well-earned rage, frustration with those who need this morality to be spelled out." It is also a reminder that history always comes down to just one simple question, she says: "When it mattered, who sided with justice, and who sided with power?"

Despite its bleakness, the book is, in fact, anchored in hope. "It is not so hard to believe, even during the worst of things, that courage is the more potent contagion," El Akkad concludes. "That there are more invested in solidarity than annihilation. That just as it has always been possible to look away, it is always possible to stop looking away."

font change

Related Articles