Israeli plans for Gaza's 'day after' ignore the humanitarian disaster it created

Netanyahu and his right-wing government have gone beyond their stated aims to remove Hamas and have destroyed Gaza in an onslaught against its people

A Palestinian carries two jugs of water next to destroyed buildings in Khan Yunis in the Gaza Strip.
AFP
A Palestinian carries two jugs of water next to destroyed buildings in Khan Yunis in the Gaza Strip.

Israeli plans for Gaza's 'day after' ignore the humanitarian disaster it created

Israel’s genocidal war against the Palestinians in Gaza has been raging for eight months, and its real objectives on the ground have become quite clear in that time. At first, Benjamin Netanyahu and his government claimed the aim was to rescue hostages, eradicate the threat of Hamas and prevent the recurrence of any future operations along the lines of the 7 October attacks.

However, the extent of the unprecedented onslaught reveals that Tel Aviv saw an opportunity to do much more. In addition to the sheer scale of the destruction, its true intentions have been revealed through the warfare strategies employed on the ground, the targets chosen, the type of weapons used, and the broader political, security, social, and economic impacts inflicted.

That range of factors is more revealing than Israeli officials' numerous and conflicting statements. Israel has unleashed its full military power to inflict maximum casualties on the Palestinians, obliterate their infrastructure, and demolish their homes. They have deprived the Palestinians of essential resources, including water, electricity, food, fuel, medicine, and shelter. The objective is clear: to render Gaza uninhabitable and force its 2 million inhabitants to leave. Estimates suggest that around 200,000 Gazans have fled.

Throughout, Palestinian armed groups continued to fight and launch attacks, and Israel was unable to secure the release of many of its hostages. Whatever else, the undeniable reality is that the fundamentals of life in Gaza have been decimated. There is nothing for them to return to once the war ends.

AFP
A column of smoke rises over the Shujaiya neighbourhood, east of Gaza City, as a result of Israeli bombing on June 22, 2024.

All of this speaks to Israel's real intention: To use the war in Gaza to intimidate and subjugate the Palestinians—imposing its will from the river to the sea—and ultimately eradicating the idea of a Palestinian state, which it perceives as a threat.

Netanyahu has obsessed over this goal since his first stint as Israeli prime minister between 1996 and 1999, which came after Yitzhak Rabin's assassination. He relentlessly pursued the same agenda during his second term, between 2009 and 2021, during which he entrenched the idea of Israel as a Jewish state in its set of basic laws, redrawn in 2018. Now, in his third term since 2022, he has continued to steer Israel toward becoming a state that derives its identity from religion rather than the liberal and democratic values it used to profess, at least for its Jewish inhabitants.

Read more: Benjamin Netanyahu: Israeli dictator dressed in democrat’s clothing

True motives exposed

The world is now seeing Netanyahu’s real position on a Palestinian state. As the international community looks to Gaza's 'day after', the notion itself is ultimately misleading. Even if Israel were to fully or partially withdraw from Gaza, what would be left for the Palestinians?

Talks focus on new governance without addressing the dire conditions Palestinians in Gaza face—and will continue to face for a very long time. There will be scarce shelter and few employment opportunities. Even the most basic necessities of life will be hard to meet, and the Palestinians who remain will have to be hugely dependent on foreign aid.

Netanyahu's idea for the 'day after' in Gaza was laid out by Israeli military spokesman Udi Dekel in remarks made in March at the Israeli National Security Research Institute and goes as follows:

1. Israel will maintain unrestricted operational freedom throughout Gaza indefinitely to prevent the resurgence of terrorism and any threats emanating from the region.

2. Israel will indefinitely maintain a security buffer zone inside Gaza along its 'borders' with Israel.

The notion of a 'day after' in Gaza is misleading. Even if Israel were to fully or partially withdraw from Gaza, what would be left for the Palestinians?

3. Israel will maintain control of the Rafah border crossing along the Philadelphi corridor between Gaza and Egypt to prevent an "influx of terrorists into Gaza".

4. Local Palestinians with administrative expertise, who have no affiliations with states or organisations that "support terrorism", will oversee civil administration and maintain public order in Gaza.

5. Netanyahu remains opposed to any establishment of a Palestinian state that could turn into "Hamastan" or "Fatahland".

Adding his insights into Netanyahu's proposed plan, Israeli journalist Ron Ben-Yishai said: "Netanyahu wants Gaza to be a distinct entity connected to the broader world through two designated corridors—one overland and one via sea. These corridors would enable Palestinians who remain in Gaza the ability to travel relatively freely, establish trade relationships with foreign nations, and engage in coastal fishing activities—all without the need to transit through Israel."

"However, Israel would maintain oversight of these corridors to prevent the smuggling of weapons and materials that could support weapon production or terrorist infrastructure," he added.

According to Ben-Yishai, Netanyahu wants the US and a select few Arab and regional countries to be involved in the reconstruction process, which would entail "securing funding for reconstruction, ensuring disarmament, and preventing terrorism, thereby safeguarding investments."

The floating pier on Gaza's coastline—now 'temporarily' moved Ashdod in Israel—is also seen to be part of Netanyahu's plan.

AFP
This handout satellite image courtesy of Maxar Technologies shows the the US-built Trident Pier on the coast of Gaza on May 26, 2024.

For its part, the Israeli National Security Research Institute (INSS) proposed its own recommendations for Gaza's 'day after'. They are: 

1. Complete disengagement of Gaza from Israel, including the closure of all border crossings between the two areas.

2. Occupation of Gaza by Israeli forces, accompanied by the establishment of either a civil administration or martial law for an extended period.

3. Restoration of Palestinian Authority control over Gaza, which is endorsed by the United States, Arab countries, and the international community.

4. Transforming Gaza into a federal province under the Palestinian Authority, bolstering local governance, and establishing a technocratic administration overseen by the Palestinian Authority with prearranged binding agreements.

5. Formation of a national unity government for Palestine, with support or involvement from both Fatah and Hamas.

6. Gaza could eventually evolve into a distinct regional entity, independent from both the Palestinian Authority in the occupied West Bank and Israel.

These recommendations conform to Israel's maximalist objective: continued occupation, settlement expansion, and reasserting political, security, and economic control over Gaza while severing its ties with the occupied West Bank.

More moderate plans for Gaza's 'day after' include temporary security measures leading to transitional phases where the Palestinian Authority would reassume control of the Strip. This is what the US seems to be pushing for as it continues to pay lip service to the idea of a Palestinian state. However, it wants to ensure this state would be able to fit into its plan for a new Middle East—one where Israel would be integrated into the region.

But talk of the future seems futile at a time when the pressing realities of widespread destruction and a humanitarian disaster take centre stage. These pressing humanitarian needs need to be urgently met before discussing the future.

This is especially urgent as Israel maintains its chokehold on allowing any goods into Gaza, leading humanitarian organisations worldwide to sound the alarm of approaching famine. Many people—particularly children—have already succumbed to starvation and malnutrition. 

And while the Palestinian people are incredibly resilient, they are the ones bearing the brunt of Israeli 'retaliation' for 7 October—not Hamas. And it seems that, for now, their future will be as bleak as their present.

font change

Related Articles