Why this year’s protests in Iran feel different

Iranians have taken to the streets to denounce their country’s sclerotic rulers before and have been met with a similarly force. But Sinwar’s ‘flood’ and Trump’s ‘hammer’ have changed the equation.

Why this year’s protests in Iran feel different

For years, Tehran projected confident deterrence across the Middle East, a citadel protected by legions. Today, it faces vulnerabilities like few other moments in recent memory, as nationwide protests, economic collapse, and a recently reconfigured regional order converge to create a perfect storm.

Iran’s leaders have witnessed—and suppressed—large-scale protest movements before, but in January 2026, external shocks have truly altered the equation. During its confrontation with Israel in the middle of 2025, Iran’s air defence systems were crippled and serious damage was inflicted on its military and multi-billion dollar nuclear facilities.

The United States’ Operation Midnight Hammer—a precision strike targeting facilities at Natanz, Fordow and Isfahan—marked an unprecedented escalation. In breaking one of Iran’s most sacrosanct red lines, Washington signalled a shift from strategic ambiguity to open confrontation.

Moment of culmination

In recent days, protests have swelled across dozens of Iranian cities. Similar scenes were witnessed when Donald Trump was campaigning for a return to the White House. At the time, he repeatedly suggested that the US could use force. In recent days, he has done so again. This is not idle rhetoric, as Midnight Hammer showed. Washington is no longer on the sidelines.

That message crystallised with a dramatic US operation to capture and remove Venezuela’s President Nicolás Maduro, a long‑time ally of Iran. In a swift and bold operation, American forces seized Maduro hours after he met the Chinese envoy. Shortly after, the US seized a Russian oil tanker, despite Russian military vessels having been sent to protect it.

The message was not lost on observers in Moscow or Tehran. The Venezuelan president was a Russian ally, but Vladimir Putin could not shield Maduro in his palace, just as he could not secure another ally, the former Syrian president Bashar al‑Assad, in Damascus. Among these global depositions of autocrats, Iran's ageing Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei sits with increasing discomfort.

Washington is no longer on the sidelines. That message crystallised with a dramatic US operation to capture and remove Nicolás Maduro.

A broader reckoning

Khamenei's advancing years have cast a long shadow over the Islamic Republic's future, raising urgent questions within its inner power circles. Throughout history, waves of protest have given rise to reformers as well as to hardliners. In Iran's case, some Revolutionary Guard commanders are reportedly mulling bringing in foreign militias to confront demonstrators inside the country, a move that demonstrates the regime's growing isolation and desperation.

This context lends the current protests their full weight. They are not merely responses to economic hardship or authoritarian rule. They represent a broader reckoning, erupting at a moment of strategic vulnerability, when repression may no longer come without cost, and when protesters sense that the regime's deterrence is eroding.

A changed landscape

The key question now looms: will change come to Tehran? The final answer will not be written in Washington or Tel Aviv. It will only be written in the streets of Iran. 

The twin shocks of Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar's 'flood' (in October 2023) and US President Donald Trump's 'hammer' (in June 2025) have redrawn the strategic map. Iran is weaker, its allies are exhausted or absent, its adversaries are bolder, and the Middle East has passed a point of no return.

font change