What the war took from Iran and what it spared

In 12 days, the Islamic Republic suffered strategic losses, shattering the illusion of invincibility. Despite that, it is still standing. Is that a victory of sorts?

What the war took from Iran and what it spared

Perhaps the greatest losses Iran suffered in its 12-day war with Israel were not material but symbolic, in particular the collapse of the narrative it had cultivated and projected of a mighty, unassailable power defying both Israel and the United States, its so-called “Great Satan.”

Iran had claimed to have the ability to annihilate Israel in a matter of days and boasted of its sway over Arab capitals such as Baghdad, Beirut, Damascus, and Sana’a. Yet the war exposed these claims for what they were: propagandistic slogans that withered under the pressure of reality.

In less than a fortnight, Iran lost most of its primary nuclear facilities, sites that had taken over three decades to build and cost tens of billions of dollars. It saw a significant portion of its missile arsenal destroyed, lost an elite cadre of military commanders and nuclear scientists, and witnessed the devastation of wide segments of its military and civilian infrastructure at the hands of Israel and the US.

Battlefield absence

Iran had been the symbolic leader of the so-called ‘Axis of Resistance,’ comprising state and non-state actors aligned against Israel and the West. Yet its leadership had been lacking even before the 12-day war.

Iran was conspicuously absent from the battlefield during Israel’s 20-month campaign of annihilation in Gaza, leaving Hamas to fend for itself. Late last year, Iran also withheld meaningful support from Hezbollah in Lebanon, again leaving it to take a pounding. Finally, in December, it stayed out of Syria as ally Bashar al-Assad’s regime collapsed.

In every practical sense, it withdrew, which invites the question: was Iran’s policy of self-preservation a grave miscalculation? Its retreat allowed Israel to dismantle its network of regional allies and proxies one by one, until finally Tehran itself became the target. This stands in sharp contrast to Iran’s longstanding ideological narrative built on maximalist threats, revolutionary bravado, and promises of Israel’s destruction.

The war exposed Iranian claims for what they were: propagandistic slogans that withered under the pressure of reality

That is not to suggest that direct earlier Iranian military intervention would have drastically changed the outcome of the past two years. It may have complicated Israeli operations, delayed the fall of Assad, or even made a strike on Iran more difficult, but it would have come with heavy costs and ignited a far more sweeping regional war involving other countries. We will never know.

Some hard truths

On the international stage, the war exposed the fragility of Iran's bet on a multipolar world order and the anticipated decline of American dominance, an expectation closely tied to the presumed fall of Israel. Iran's recent accession to the BRICS bloc, which includes China, India, and Russia, was framed as a strategic pivot, but the 12-day war highlighted how BRICS was still no match for US political, economic, technological, or military decision-making.

Israel, a small ideological state whose government includes far-right religious-nationalist ministers, emerged from the conflict as perhaps the region's dominant military power. Its swift and humiliating defeat of the 'Axis,' revealing the vacuity of its slogans, now allows Israel to hold sway over the region for the foreseeable future.

Israel's government can now brag about having cemented its dominance over the Palestinians, dismantled the 'Resistance Axis,' crippled Iran's nuclear capabilities, established aerial control over Tehran, confined Iran to its own borders, and reasserted a power of deterrence backed by Western support, giving it technological superiority and military edge.

Yet definitions of 'victory' and 'defeat' in multifaceted, overlapping conflicts are neither fixed nor absolute. Iran's government has not fallen, some of its ballistic missiles breached Israel's supposedly impregnable missile defence system, its military leaders have been replaced, its nuclear knowledge is unlikely to have been lost, and its enriched uranium seems to have been moved to a different location before the American bombing of Fordow. In short, Iran lives to fight another day.

A gulf exposed

What stands out from this short but brutal conflict is that Israel—despite its small size relative to Iran in terms of territory, population, and resources—outperforms its rival militarily, technologically, and even economically. Regarding the latter, Israel's per capita income is $55,000; Iran's hovers around $4,400. Israel's 10 million people export $77bn of goods and products annually; Iran's 90 million people export around $71bn, most of which is oil and gas to China.

Despite the bombast from Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei, it is now evident that Iran has suffered profound losses that rock its very foundation. Yet the war also revealed Israel's difficulty in confronting a conventional state adversary with a professional army and the ability not only to absorb attacks but to respond in a sustained conflict.

Despite the bombast from the Supreme Leader, Iran has suffered profound losses that rock its very foundation

The events that have followed have been unprecedented in Israel's modern history, in terms of scope, duration, and the number of actors involved. This may prompt some soul-searching in Israel. Does it want to be a 'normal' state with defined borders co-existing peacefully with its neighbours, or does it want to remain a fortified, exclusionary, Sparta-like enclave, sealed off and in perpetual conflict with those living nearby?

It feels like a moment of reckoning. Israel's longest-serving prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, still has fraud and bribery charges hanging over him. His pursuit of war in Gaza (instead of ceasefires and negotiations to release the hostages) has not been popular, nor have his efforts to undermine the independence of Israel's judiciary. To some, he is still in power only because Israel has not had an election since the catastrophic intelligence and security failures on 7 October 2023 led to so many Israelis being killed or captured.

Likewise, in Iran, this feels like a moment of respite. Few think these 12 days of war will be the last time Israel and Iran come to blows. Yet despite the damage to its prestige and credibility, Iran succeeded in preserving its core interests by stopping the war before it expanded deeper into its territory. The recent past has been a whirlwind, and the future may be just as bumpy.

font change