Competing visions for the Middle East ahead of Cairo Summit

Israel, Türkiye, and Iran all have a plan for the region. Arab leaders met in Riyadh to come up with their own. Meanwhile, Trump walks back his plan for Gaza, saying he 'won't force it'.

Members of the Egyptian Special Forces during their deployment at the border between Egypt and the Gaza Strip in Rafah, October 20, 2023.
AFP
Members of the Egyptian Special Forces during their deployment at the border between Egypt and the Gaza Strip in Rafah, October 20, 2023.

Competing visions for the Middle East ahead of Cairo Summit

There is an old proverb: “May you live in interesting times.” The Middle East, particularly the Levant, seems to experience nothing but interesting times. In this part of the world, sadly, ‘interesting’ often means turmoil, chaos, and difficulty.

The people of Palestine, Syria, Lebanon, and Iraq have long suffered—none more so than the Palestinians. Since October 7 2023, the Palestinians of Gaza have suffered like never before, Israel’s brutal assault on the Strip killing tens of thousands. The final death toll will probably never be known, but it is undoubtedly higher than the figures reported.

According to the medical journal The Lancet, indirect deaths are many times higher than the number killed from direct bombing. A conservative estimate puts the figure at almost 10% of the entire population. More than 80% of the rest have had their homes destroyed. Israel has made sure that there is little food, little electricity, and little healthcare, rendering the Strip practically uninhabitable. These actions have a name.

Syrians, on the other hand, have had the shackles of the Ba’ath Party removed after half a century of al-Assad family rule. Hope is tempered by concern, however. Syrians want the country to transition to a united, pluralistic, non-sectarian state with economic prospects, but they fear they may simply end up swapping one despotic regime for another.

In Lebanon, the people are slowly recovering after a brutal 2024 assault—again by Israel. More than a million were displaced, and the cost of the physical damage will run into the billions of dollars. Yet there is hope here, too. The country has finally elected a president. For the first time in more than two years, Lebanon now has both a president and a prime minister.

REUTERS/Mohamed Azakir
Vehicles drive near damaged buildings in Beirut's southern suburbs after a ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah took effect, Lebanon November 27, 2024.

Their rebuilding task, both politically and economically, is colossal, and it must be undertaken while the country remains occupied: Israel has refused to honour its commitments by saying it intends to keep its troops in some areas of southern Lebanon. Nobody seems willing or able to kick them out.

Elsewhere in the Levant, Iraq is also fragile. Here, as in so many other arenas, foreign powers (like Iran) compete for influence. Beyond the Levant, Libya also hosts competing foreign interests. In Sudan, two warring generals continue tearing the country in two, while in Yemen, the Houthis remain in control of the capital, Sana'a, and the important port of Hodeidah. Never have so many Arab countries faced so many threats from so many directions.

Three regional visions

Taking a step back, there are three competing visions for the future of the Middle East. The first is Israeli. Having pummelled Gaza and further encroached on the West Bank, its troops are now in both Lebanon and Syria—and intend to stay. Having weakened Iran’s proxies, Tel Aviv now wants to weaken Iran directly, with American support. But its plans are far bigger than military strikes: Israel wants regime change in Tehran.

The second vision for the Middle East is Turkish. Ankara seeks to influence the region by installing friendly political Islamist regimes in countries like Egypt, Libya and Syria.

It failed in Egypt but has had recent success in Syria. In Libya, it supports a weak Tripoli government. After many years, Ankara finally feels that it can best secure its interests by cooperating with Arab countries, rather than trying to dominate them.

Tel Aviv now wants to strike Iran directly, with US support. But its plans are far bigger: it wants regime change there.

The third vision is Iranian. Tehran has been greatly weakened after its proxies (Hezbollah, the Houthis, Hamas) were dealt major military blows, but it is far from defeated. Iran's vision has been based on a strategy of forward defence (not unlike that of Israel), hence its foreign proxies protecting the Iranian heartland. In the process of building these proxy fighting forces, however, Iran has destabilised several countries. 

All three visions reflect different interests and are, therefore, in competition. Missing from this list is a common Arab vision for the future of the region, which is yet to be articulated if it ever could be. To complicate an already-complicated situation, the newly arrived Trump administration in Washington is adding yet another layer of uncertainty.

Gaza and Israel

Early indications from Trump's second term are alarming. In one comment, which went largely unnoticed on social media, he said: "He who saves his Country does not violate any Law." The inference is that if Trump feels he is acting in America's best interests, he need not care about laws, whether US or international. The US judiciary cares, however. Many of his executive orders are being challenged in the courts. 

Trump's announcement that he will remove millions of Palestinians from Gaza to build resorts in a new "riviera" is a clear violation of international law, as has been almost every Israeli action in Gaza, the West Bank, Lebanon, and Syria since October 2023. Some amount to war crimes, crimes against humanity, and, quite possibly, genocide.

When it comes to the Middle East, the US appears to acquiesce, if not openly support, the Israeli vision for the future of the region. De-populating Gaza is a gift better than anything Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu could ever have dreamed of. It fits perfectly with Israeli plans to reshape the region. No wonder Netanyahu called Trump "the greatest friend that Israel has ever had in the White House". 

To confirm that he was, Trump announced an extra $8bn of weapons to Israel, on top of the billions already provided by his predecessor, Joe Biden. Trump also signed off on the delivery to Israel of American 2,000-pound bombs—weapons so destructive that even Biden kept them under lock and key. 

Security guarantor

US administrations of all stripes have long sought to reduce their military commitments in the Middle East and devote more resources to the Asia-Pacific region. Historically, the US has been the ultimate guarantor of security in the Middle East, so if it is to retreat from that role, it ideally needs to put alternative arrangements in place to preserve its interests. 

Since no country can match the US for military, economic, and political clout, the only viable alternative is a regional security system that safeguards US interests, and herein lies the disturbing congruence of US-Israeli interests.

In Trump's first administration, he prioritised the integration of Israel in the region through the Abraham Accords (signed with Bahrain and the UAE (which got advanced US-made fighter jets in return), then with Morocco (which got US recognition of Moroccan sovereignty over the disputed Western Sahara region). Trump now wants more Arab states to do so.

The Biden administration followed up by supporting Israel's initiative in launching the Negev Forum—a political-military alliance composed of Israel and Arab countries with the aim of countering Iran. The purpose is to integrate Israel further into the region by coordinating air defence systems.

REUTERS/Amir Cohen
Israel's Iron Dome anti-missile system intercepts rockets after Iran fired a salvo of ballistic missiles, as seen from Ashkelon, Israel, October 1, 2024

Eyes move to Iran

For Israel, things are moving in the right direction. Last year, when Iran sent a flurry of missiles and drones towards Tel Aviv, some Arab countries even took part in action to prevent them from reaching their intended target (it is unlikely that they did so to protect Israel, but rather to prevent any regional escalation).

With Trump pulling elbows and the rhetoric over Iran once again rising, the Negev Forum project may be resurrected. While Trump has repeatedly said that he would prefer to do a deal with Iran over its nuclear programme, he has left the option of military action open, and in recent days, his team has suggested that Trump's Iran demands are maximalist, in that Tehran should ditch its entire programme.

US intelligence reportedly believes that Israel wants to strike Iran in the first six months of 2025. Netanyahu is keen to involve America in this. This, once again, would serve its vision for the region. Yet Arab countries still have a voice. They squarely rejected Trump's Gaza plan and could squarely reject escalation with Iran. Whether they come up with a credible alternative idea for Gaza in response, as Trump has asked, remains to be seen. 

A wider Arab vision for the region, starting with the reconstruction of Gaza, would be useful. It would be linked to the establishment of a viable Palestinian state (which Israel would oppose), require an Israeli withdrawal from both Gaza and Lebanon (which Israel would oppose), and require an Israeli withdrawal from Syria to let the new authorities in Damascus control its borders (which Israel would oppose). 

To this end, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman convened an informal meeting in Riyadh on 21 February attended by the leaders of Egypt, Jordan, Qatar, UAE, Kuwait and Bahrain.

They discussed joint efforts supporting "the Palestinian cause" and Gaza developments, the Saudi state news agency SPA said. After the meeting, Trump gave an interview with Fox News Radio's Brian Kilmeade, saying his plan to take over the Gaza Strip "really works" but would not force it.

"I think that's the plan that really works. But I'm not forcing it. I'm just going to sit back and recommend it," he said, adding that he was "a little surprised" that Jordan and Egypt would oppose it given "we pay Jordan and Egypt billions of dollars a year."

The meeting in Riyadh comes more than a week before the upcoming Arab Summit in Cairo, set to convene on 4 March. There, Arab states have an opportunity to ensure that their destiny remains in their own hands. They should seize it before others do.

font change