America’s next president and yet another ‘New Middle East’

Every so often, the region experiences such a period of upheaval that permanent change is considered inevitable. The next White House incumbent will preside over another such moment

America’s next president and yet another ‘New Middle East’

Selecting the cover story for our November issue was particularly challenging because it coincides with two significant events: the US elections and the recent escalation in the Middle East, most notably between Israel and Iran.

In the end, we chose to look at the incoming US President and the possibility of a changed Middle East, exploring this topic through articles and interviews, looking at it from different angles. Yet the idea of a ‘New Middle East’ is anything but new.

In 1991, with Saddam Hussein being driven out of Kuwait, Arab-Israeli peace talks making progress, and the Soviet Union’s dissolution leading many to seek alternative sponsors, talk of a ‘New Middle East’ began to surface. Its most prominent proponent was former Israeli Prime Minister Shimon Peres. Writing in the mid-1990s, he foresaw a future of peace, cooperation, and regional integration.

Years later, in the aftermath of the 11 September 2001 attacks on the US, President George W. Bush went after the Taliban in Afghanistan and overthrew Saddam in Iraq. The idea was to set off a domino effect in neighbouring countries, creating a ‘New Middle East’ defined by democracy, pluralism, and regional integration, capable of countering terrorism and authoritarianism.

Another ‘New Middle East’ moment followed the short but destructive July 2006 war between Hezbollah and Israel in Lebanon after the assassination of Lebanese Prime Minister Rafic Hariri and the withdrawal of the Syrian army a year earlier. US National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice heralded the “birth pangs of a new Middle East”.

Shifting focus

For decades, through war and peace, negotiation and confrontation, the Middle East’s reshaping has been trumpeted to great fanfare. But Bush’s interventionism backfired, attempts to impose reform in countries like Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, and Iran floundered, and subsequent US administrations—from Obama to Trump to Biden—remained wary.

Instead, their focus shifted to ending protracted conflicts. The US withdrew from Iraq in 2011 and from Afghanistan in 2021 while remaining diplomatically, economically, and militarily engaged in the region.

For three decades, through war and peace, negotiation and confrontation, the Middle East's reshaping has been trumpeted to great fanfare

In recent weeks, talk of a 'New Middle East' has re-emerged, this time led by Israel. Having crushed Hamas, decapitated Hezbollah, pummelled the Houthis, and struck Iran directly, it is now pushing forward its regional agenda and transformative strategy. By weakening Iran and its proxies so radically, Tel Aviv wants to reshape the Middle East. This intent was made clear in Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's speech to the UN General Assembly in September 2024, when he divided the "new Middle East" into two blocs: one aligned with Israel, the other with Iran.

Read more: Israel ramps up its 'war' on the United Nations

Struggle for influence

Tehran recognises that its 'Axis of Resistance' has endured crippling setbacks and has had to pivot drastically. Talks with the Americans are now being mooted. Whether the Iranians find an open ear in Washington depends on who sits in the White House from January. At the same time, Arab Gulf states have a different prescription. They want to promote a forward-looking vision, with de-escalation in Gaza and Lebanon—and between Iran and Israel. They want to open pathways for political dialogue toward a two-state solution that will lead to regional stability and cooperation among all the region's stakeholders.

This struggle for influence in the Middle East therefore now narrows to the three main approaches: Israeli, Iranian, and Arab. The next US president will have options and who America elects will dictate a great deal. In many ways, Kamala Harris and Donald Trump could not be more different. Domestically, they are at odds on issues such as abortion and immigration, while in foreign policy, they differ on China, Russia, Israel, Iran, and the wider Middle East.

Trump is expected to give Netanyahu's right-wing government carte blanche, while Harris is likely to give it much less leeway. Most suspect that her policies will closely mirror those of Biden, although her rhetoric may differ. Time will tell.

Alongside our cover story, the November issue includes an interesting interview with former Turkish President Abdullah Gul, an investigative report 20 years after Yasser Arafat's death, and a wealth of other articles on politics, economics, science, and culture.

We hope you enjoy reading it.

font change