The new Syria: allies at odds and Russia’s return

The honeymoon period—characterised by unified Arab, regional, and Western backing for Damascus—seems to have ended, giving way to a phase marked by competing foreign agendas in Syria

The new Syria: allies at odds and Russia’s return

Syria has entered a new phase, bringing to a close the political “honeymoon” that followed the regime’s collapse late last year. Several developments illustrate this shift: the “Unity of the Components” conference in Hasakah, east of the Euphrates, the French-Turkish rivalry over the Kurdish question, the Amman dialogue on the Druze file, and the cautious return of Russia’s role.

The Autonomous Administration in North and East Syria (AANES) could not have convened its conference without French support and the absence of American objection, given that both countries maintain military and special forces east of the Euphrates as part of the international coalition. The participation—through public statements—of Druze Sheikh Hikmat al-Hijri and Alawite Council head Ghazal Ghazal was no coincidence; it signalled the beginnings of a “minorities alliance” opposed to the government’s position and to the Sunni majority.

The conference’s closing statement openly endorsed decentralisation, the drafting of a new constitution, and the formation of a new national army. This course was reinforced when the three Druze religious authorities moved to unify their stance. Sheikhs Hamoud al-Hanawi and Yusuf al-Jarbou issued video statements echoing al-Hijri’s criticism of the government, calling for an international investigation, and noting the positions of several states, including Israel.

Following the conference, Jordan and the United States began arranging a ministerial-level negotiation track in Amman between the government and Druze leaders, with the participation of officials from several countries, including Türkiye. This represents an effort to establish a regional alternative to the international “Paris track” in addressing the Kurdish and Druze issues.

Paris had earlier hosted Syrian-Israeli talks on the future of the southern provinces bordering Jordan, during which Israel presented a set of demands that included the withdrawal of all heavy and medium weaponry from the south and the establishment of local councils and autonomous administrations in Suweida, Daraa, and Quneitra, under Israeli air cover.

A shift in Western rhetoric has likely prompted Damascus to reach out to Moscow to create an eastern counterbalance to the West, restrain Israel and stabilise the Syrian coast

The French capital also hosted Syrian-American-French talks on the Kurdish file and the implementation of the 10 March agreement between President Ahmed al-Sharaa and Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) commander Mazloum Abdi.

Available information indicates that Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan, during his recent meeting with President al-Sharaa in Damascus, delivered a message calling for the suspension of the Paris track—the French-sponsored negotiations between the Syrian government and the Kurds.

Although the "Components Conference" in northeastern Syria was held with French support and without American objection, Ankara used the content of its final statement to strengthen its case against this track, viewing Paris as biased towards the Kurds, while Paris sees Ankara as biased towards al-Sharaa's government. In light of these tensions, the Syrian government formally announced the suspension of Kurdish negotiations in Paris.

France and Türkiye's disagreements over the Kurdish issue, together with Turkish–Israeli differences over the issue of the Druze and southern arrangements, point to the first cracks in the alliance of the Syrian government's allies. The honeymoon period—characterised by unified Arab, regional, and Western backing for Damascus—seems to have ended, giving way to a phase marked by competing foreign agendas in Syria.

The return of Russia

Adding further complexity is the clear sign of a renewed Russian role. The visit to Moscow by Foreign Minister Asaad al-Shaibani, Defence Minister Murhaf Abu Qasra, and Intelligence Chief Hussein Salameh—during which they met with President Vladimir Putin and senior Russian officials— marks the start of a new chapter in Damascus-Moscow relations.

A Turkish role in the renewed engagement between Moscow and Damascus cannot be ruled out.

Discussions reportedly covered the resumption of Russian arms supplies to Syria, joint management of the Hmeimim and Tartus bases, expanded economic cooperation, Russian patrols in various parts of the country, and the fate of Bashar al-Assad and senior regime figures currently in Moscow.

It is likely that Damascus, which has enjoyed "unlimited Western support" over the past seven months, has begun to notice a shift in Western rhetoric, demands, and actions following the recent events in the coastal region and in Suweida, as well as the continuation of Israeli strikes and incursions.

In response, it has sought to reach out to Moscow with specific aims: creating an eastern counterbalance to the West, restraining Israeli activity, stabilising the Syrian coast, and achieving a military balance on the ground through the operation of Qamishli Airport and the deployment of patrols in the country's northeast. Here, a Turkish role in the renewed engagement between Moscow and Damascus cannot be ruled out.

Myriad questions

Key questions now arise: Will the United States and European powers, preoccupied with the war in Ukraine, allow Russia to re-establish itself in Syria? Will Damascus accept the creation of decentralised administrations? Will political coordination among the "components" expand to military cooperation? How will Damascus respond to the new climate of demands and alliances? And what form will the military balance take among the main actors on the ground: the United States, Türkiye, Russia, and Israel?

The answers may be many, but one thing is certain: Syria is entering a new stage in which the agendas of Damascus's allies are coming into the open, their interests diverging, and the struggle over—and within—the country is being reignited.

font change