Gaza's fate teeters between two drastic outcomes

The coming weeks or even months will unfold slowly, heavily, and bloodily for Gaza. Only time will tell whether this war will result in collective gain or loss for the Palestinian people and their cause.

Gaza's fate teeters between two drastic outcomes

The history of Gaza is far-reaching, extending beyond 7 October. It is a history woven with tragedies, suffering, battles, truces, and deals, reaching back long before its occupation in 1967, the Oslo Accords in 1993, the Israeli officials' dreams of it getting “swallowed by the sea,” the Israeli withdrawal in 2005, Hamas’s control over it in 2007, and the Israeli military operations in recent years.

But 7 October undoubtedly marked a pivotal moment, and the magnitude of the surprise unleashed by Hamas is unprecedented. Israel's response was also unprecedented, as was its plan to pursue "substantial changes" on the ground. Time will tell whether the Palestinians in Gaza will gain or lose from this militant operation.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has had unequivocal backing from Western nations and successfully persuaded America to re-engage militarily in the Middle East after a 15-year hiatus.

He dubbed his effort the "Second War of Independence," signalling his intent to impose a "strategic shift" in the region, starting with Gaza.

The stated goal is to eliminate Hamas' military infrastructure and leadership and displace Gazans from north to south with the possibility of relocating them to Sinai in the future.

This elimination and displacement might occur through various means, such as assassinations, bombings, air strikes, settlements, or deportations, like what happened to Fatah's leaders after the events of "Black September" who were deported from Jordan to Lebanon 50 years ago, and subsequently from Lebanon to Tunisia 40 years ago.

Possible outcomes

As for what comes next, various proposals are circulating; some are old, and some are new, ranging from reinstating the Palestinian Authority and Fatah movement to establishing a civilian administration to govern Gaza.

Additionally, there are discussions about Arab and Western investments to reconstruct Gaza, deploying authoritative and monitoring forces and setting the stage for negotiations to reach a political settlement.

On its part, Hamas perceives that “the Israeli plan will achieve nothing” except lead to a surge in civilian casualties – their number has already reached 10,000 and is likely to increase substantially.

The group also dismissed the possibility of Palestinians in Gaza being pushed to the Sinai in a "new Nakba".

Hamas argues against comparisons with the Islamic State (IS) in Mosul or Raqqa, or with Fatah in Jordan and Lebanon, asserting that such analogies “are inaccurate because Hamas is a part of the Gaza community.”

They contend that even if Hamas leaders are displaced, new generations will take their place.” Additionally, there is always the possibility that extremists might fill the void left by Hamas.

Hamas perceives that "the Israeli plan will achieve nothing" except lead to a surge in civilian casualties – their number has already reached 10,000, and it could increase. The group also dismissed the possibility of Palestinians in Gaza being pushed to the Sinai in a "new Nakba".

Hamas leadership has privately expressed disappointment with Hezbollah and Iran for not directly intervening in starting a large-scale battle in southern Lebanon. 

One notable instance of this frustration occurred when a former Hamas official outside Gaza, Khaled Meshaal, openly criticised Iran and its affiliated groups. This critique elicited responses from close associates of Hezbollah in Lebanon.

Strategy

However, Hamas continues to place its bets on "overwhelming the Israeli army in the tunnels of Gaza." The group is counting on the prospect of Netanyahu scaling back his demands as military operations persist, losses among Israeli soldiers rise, and public pressure on him intensifies.

Negotiations for a prisoner exchange between Hamas and Israel are still in progress. There are two potential outcomes: a comprehensive deal involving the release of over 200 prisoners from Gaza in exchange for 6,000 from Israeli prisons, or a partial agreement focusing on women and children on both sides.

Hamas seeks a ceasefire, the establishment of humanitarian corridors, and the provision of aid and fuel in exchange for releasing the prisoners. Israel has rejected these conditions and pushed forward with its air and ground assault. 

Hamas is counting on the prospect of Netanyahu scaling back his demands as military operations persist, losses among Israeli soldiers rise, and public pressure on him intensifies.

Battle far from over

The ongoing incursions in northern Gaza and the negotiations in various capitals indicate that the conflict is still in its early stages, despite three weeks having passed. Israel perceives this as a "war for survival" and views it as a "historic opportunity" to impose significant changes on the ground.

Israel dismisses accusations of war crimes and enforcing a siege on Gaza, and calls for a ceasefire or humanitarian truce. They say it will be a long war.

On its part, Hamas sees this as a chance to scale back Israeli occupation and advance Palestinian rights, despite the staggering death toll. It bases its assessment on decades of history where Palestinians were able to achieve tangible gains through violence. 

Hence, the coming weeks or even months will unfold slowly, heavily, and bloodily for Gaza. Only time will tell whether this war will result in collective gain or loss for the Palestinian people and their cause.

font change