China’s Latin America trade ties are becoming political

Beijing used to simply finance infrastructure projects in America’s backyard, but its involvement has deepened in recent years and now goes beyond economics

China's President Xi Jinping and Peru's President Dina Boluarte attend the welcome ceremony at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China, on 28 June 2024.
JADE GAO/REUTERS
China's President Xi Jinping and Peru's President Dina Boluarte attend the welcome ceremony at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China, on 28 June 2024.

China’s Latin America trade ties are becoming political

For two decades, China’s growing presence in Latin America was largely understood through commodities, trade, and sovereign lending. Today, that interpretation looks incomplete. It is involved in ports, digital networks, energy, advanced manufacturing, political coordination, and security cooperation, to name but a few, while Chinese policy presents Latin America and the Caribbean as an area of future focus.

Most elements of the old relationship remain in place. Commodities, for instance, are still central. But when Latin American countries began joining China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), they plugged into Beijing’s global infrastructure programme. The geopolitical significance of that may lie in what those connections now enable.

As China becomes more deeply embedded in infrastructure, technology, and regional institutions, Latin American governments find that they have more latitude to diversify partnerships and pursue their priorities. Predictably, Washington is unhappy with its global rival’s incursion into its backyard, yet Latin American governments want greater autonomy in their foreign relations and resist the idea that the US can do what it wants in the Western Hemisphere.

Old foundations

China’s relationship with Latin America is still rooted in the conditions that drove its growth during the commodity boom of the 2000s, when Chinese demand for raw materials transformed regional trade. Securing supplies of minerals, energy, and food remains a priority, and the BRI did not produce the transformation some expected, yet it built on earlier efforts to finance infrastructure and strengthen ties.

That continuity is visible today. Latin America supplies most of China’s soybean imports, and almost all its lithium carbonate, for instance. Resources therefore continue to drive Beijing’s commercial interests in the region, even as sovereign loans and state-backed infrastructure projects are replaced by private capital in areas such as telecoms, renewables, electricity transmission, electric vehicles (EVs), batteries, and advanced manufacturing.

Research by the Inter-American Dialogue and Boston University Global Development Policy Centre found that Chinese development bank lending to the region averaged just over $1.3bn annually between 2019-23, far below its earlier peak. A separate analysis found that industries classified as ‘new infrastructure’ accounted for 58% of Chinese foreign direct investment (FDI) in Latin America and the Caribbean in 2022. This reflects domestic economic goals within China, as Beijing promotes its tech industries to secure markets for Chinese firms.

REUTERS/Rafael Martins
BYD vehicles in the production line at the company's new electric vehicle factory at the Industrial Complex in Camacari, Bahia, Brazil, on 3 February 2026.

New dimensions

China has not left commodities behind, but has added further layers that connect Beijing more closely with sectors shaping Latin America’s future development. As these connections multiply, decisions over energy systems, digital networks, industrial policy, and supply chains become intertwined with foreign policy, extending their significance beyond individual investments and making them harder to treat as purely commercial.

The political dimension is clearest in the institutional architecture surrounding Beijing’s engagement with the region. China’s 2025 policy framework places Latin America within a wider conception of the ‘Global South’ and a more diffuse international order. The Community of Latin American and Caribbean States (CELAC) serves as a regional platform. Created in 2011, it has 33 member countries (the US and Canada are not among them) and has maintained a formal forum with China since 2014.

The 2025-27 China-CELAC Action Plan calls for closer high-level dialogue and exchanges and coordination on international affairs.

The 2025-27 China-CELAC Action Plan begins with political relations, calling for closer high-level dialogue and coordination on international affairs, as well as exchanges among and between legislatures, local governments, universities, think tanks, and political parties. Beijing invites 300 political officials from CELAC countries to China each year, alongside academic, journalistic, and professional programmes. The aim is to embed relations that will endure changes of government.

This expansion carries geopolitical implications, without establishing that Latin American states are moving into Beijing's orbit. Through regional structures for political coordination, and with initiatives covering cybersecurity, transnational organised crime, police training, space technology, and AI governance, Beijing burrows deeper into Washington's sphere without inviting direct confrontation. 

Reuters
Chinese President Xi Jinping and Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva during a welcoming ceremony held at the Great Hall of the People in Beijing, China, on 13 May 2025.

The initiatives and action plans of these multilateral structures are flexible and voluntary, allowing individual governments to choose their level of involvement. Influence is therefore exerted without control. There is no evidence to suggest that Chinese FDI has led to autocratic governance across Latin America, contrary to claims that economic reliance erodes political sovereignty.

Capital flows, institutional links, and high-level relationships build ties between decision-makers without predetermining how governments respond. The political effects of this depend on the choices made by Latin American states themselves. Most have not transferred allegiance to Beijing wholesale. They instead take a selective approach, guided by national interests and the opportunities created by a bipolar or multipolar world.

Analysis of UN General Assembly votes from 2001-23 found that most democratic Latin American states voted with China on economic issues but with the West on human rights, sovereignty, and territorial integrity, showing how they are neither in one camp nor the other. Governments can therefore compartmentalise foreign relations according to the interests at stake.

Ports of perception

Latin American agency becomes particularly visible at Peru's Chancay port. The $3bn shipping terminal is part of China's BRI and is often portrayed through the prism of Beijing's reach, especially as Chinese state-owned COSCO Shipping Ports holds a controlling 60% stake in its operator. In February 2026, the United States warned that China's control of the port threatened Peru's sovereignty.

But for Peru, it reinforces the country's ambition to be a Pacific gateway between South America and Asia, offering shorter shipping times to China and substantial regional transhipment. Brazil and China are now looking to build a railway connecting Chancay with Brazil's Atlantic coast.

Chinese investment and Peruvian objectives therefore overlap. Chancay shows how the same infrastructure can benefit Beijing while advancing the objectives defined by a Latin American state. Washington sees it differently, however.

Reuters
A new port by the Chinese state-owned company COSCO Shipping—expected to shorten maritime distances to Asia for Peruvian and some Brazilian goods—in Chancay, Peru, on 24 October 2024.

A 2025 study by the Centre for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS) identified 37 port projects involving Chinese companies across Latin America and the Caribbean and assessed their strategic relevance in terms of benefits to Beijing and the degree of US exposure. Crucially, only ten were owned or operated by Chinese firms; the others involved Chinese financing, construction, or equipment provision.

Diversifying choice

Washington looks at commercial infrastructure in terms of possible future security vulnerabilities. Ports can be geopolitically important because they impact supply chains, data, maritime access, and military logistics, even if designated commercial (concerns have been raised about Chancay's dual-use potential).

Beijing sees infrastructure as a means of expanding connectivity with the region; states like Peru see it as facilitating access to Asian markets, but the US sees it as altering the strategic environment in 'its' hemisphere. The conflict lies between Beijing's ambitions, Washington's attempts to preserve influence, and Latin American governments' decisions on who to work with, and on what.

China's engagement with Latin America has now entered a more overtly political period. Beijing has not replaced commodities with geopolitics, but the accumulation of commercial, diplomatic, and institutional connections can no longer be understood through trade and investment alone. This does not indicate a region shifting towards China, but one pursuing investment and diplomatic diversification without accepting a single geopolitical alignment.

font change