‘Kushner and Witkoff spoiled the US-Iran talks’

Sources tell Al Majalla that Iran was able to build a rapport with US Vice President JD Vance in Islamabad, but sensed his hands were tied in the presence of Trump’s son-in-law and close friend

Jared Kushner and Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif interact in Islamabad, Pakistan, on 11 April 2026.
Jacquelyn Martin/ REUTERS
Jared Kushner and Pakistan's Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif interact in Islamabad, Pakistan, on 11 April 2026.

‘Kushner and Witkoff spoiled the US-Iran talks’

After a taxing 21 hours, US Vice President JD Vance thanked Pakistan for hosting US-Iran talks but ultimately concluded that “Iran was not prepared to accept our demands.”

So ended perhaps the most important peace talks arguably since the end of the Cold War. Vance was the most senior American leader to meet with Iranian officials since the 1979 Revolution, and the encounter was the first direct contact with the IRGC rather than with traditional diplomats and negotiators, lending the meeting unique significance.

The Iranian delegation comprised at least half a dozen senior IRGC representatives, including the Ambassador in Islamabad, who has been a contemporary of Iranian Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf. For its part, the US delegation included Andrew Baker, the deputy national security adviser to the president and the national security adviser to the vice president, and Michael Vance, the special advisor to the vice president for Asian affairs.

Given Iran's lack of trust in Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, their presence seems to have spoiled the talks. The two envoys—the former being Donald Trump’s son-in-law, with no official position in his administration, and the latter, his close friend and real estate magnate—have earned a reputation in the president’s second term as representing Israel's interests rather than America's. Pakistani security officials told me that while the Iranians were able to build a rapport with Vance, they sensed his hands were tied in the presence of Kushner and Witkoff.

Jacquelyn Martin/ REUTERS
Vice President JD Vance at a news conference as Jared Kushner, left, and Steve Witkoff, Special Envoy for Peace Missions listen on 12 April 2026, in Islamabad.

Israel influence

Ahead of the talks, Iranian media played interview clips of Joe Kent, the most senior US official to step down over the US decision to wage war on Iran. Following his resignation, the former Director of the United States National Counterterrorism Centre explicitly said that the US decision to wage war on Iran came at the insistence of Israel—a claim that a recently published New York Times article seems to corroborate. They also aired US Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s comments to the press, when he said the US decided to join the war after Israel said it was planning to attack regardless of Washington’s participation, and knew that such an attack would trigger Iranian retaliation on US bases in the region.

The belief that the US is being forced into war with Iran by Israel has seeped out of America's fringe circles and permeated into the mainstream. Former MAGA heavyweights like Conservative podcast hosts Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Candace Owens and Alex Jones, and even Charlie Kirk—whose assassination last year has led some to speculate whether or not Israel had a hand in it—all assert the same. Furthermore, John Kerry and Ben Rhodes, who served in previous US administrations, both stated that Israel tried to bully every US president into attacking Iran, but Trump was the first one to actually cave under pressure.

Jacquelyn Martin/ REUTERS
US Vice President JD Vance walks as Jared Kushner looks on, after arriving for talks with Iranian officials in Islamabad, Pakistan, on 11 April 2026.

For his part, Vance has been notably quiet since the US and Iran attacked Iran on 28 February. While being on record for his opposition to war with Iran and also issuing tepid criticisms of Israel on its Gaza war and settlement expansion in the occupied West Bank, he said he wouldn't stand in the way of Trump's decision to wage war on Iran, according to the New York Times account.

Lebanese massacre

Meanwhile, in Islamabad, the Iranians began the talks by pointing out the growing American belief that Israel forced the US into the war. They also emphasised that Lebanon had always been part of the ceasefire—something that Pakistan both confirmed and stressed. Following the announcement of the truce overnight on Tuesday, Israel carried out one of the deadliest assaults on Lebanon in its history on Wednesday, dropping more than 100 bombs across the country and in central Beirut (not considered a Hezbollah stronghold) in 10 minutes, killing more than 300 people.

In Islamabad, the Iranians began the talks by pointing out the growing American belief that Israel forced the US into the war.

A day after the attack, and a day before US and Iranian officials met in Islamabad, Pakistani Defence Minister Khawaja Asif described Israel as "a curse for humanity". In the since-deleted post, Asif wrote that "peace talks are underway in Islamabad, genocide is being committed in Lebanon. Innocent citizens are being killed by Israel, first in Gaza, then in Iran and now in Lebanon; bloodletting continues unabated. I hope and pray that the people who created this cancerous state on Palestinian land, to get rid of European Jews, burn in hell."

Concessions and red lines

As for the nuts and bolts of what was discussed in Islamabad, my sources shared insights into the points where Tehran was willing and unwilling to negotiate. They told me Iran was potentially open to moving its enriched uranium to a third country, such as Türkiye. This had been discussed in Oman prior to the start of this current round of hostilities and confirmed by the Omani Foreign Minister himself.

Reuters
An oil tanker docked in Muscat port, Oman, amid Iranian threats to close the Strait of Hormuz, on 7 March 2026.

Iran was also open to lifting its tax on commercial shipping in the Strait of Hormuz, but only if primary and secondary sanctions on the country were lifted. Furthermore, the Iranians were also open to limiting their support to their regional 'axis of resistance' allies, but drew a red line over any talk of eliminating or scaling back their missile capabilities.

Maximalist demands

For his part, Trump shared his view of the talks' conclusion in a Truth Social post, saying that many issues had been agreed upon, but the US would accept only 100% compliance from Iran—not even 95%. As things stand, the two sides remain very far apart on core issues. However, since the delegates left Islamabad on Saturday, Pakistan says regular contact between the two sides has continued.

But later, Trump came out and announced the US would conduct its own blockade of the Hormuz and prevent any ships destined to or from Iran from entering or exiting. An internet meme has since circulated, jokingly describing it as "a blockade to block a blockade".

font change