A starved Gaza is not collateral damage. It is a Netanyahu policy

Israel’s war aims go beyond the defeat of Hamas to the collective punishment of two million Palestinians. It is losing friends fast, while Gazans lose far more than that.

Palestinian woman Najla Abu Aya feeds her five-month-old daughter, Rama, who is malnourished, according to medics, at Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, July 24, 2025.
Ramadan Abed / Reuters
Palestinian woman Najla Abu Aya feeds her five-month-old daughter, Rama, who is malnourished, according to medics, at Nasser Hospital in Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, July 24, 2025.

A starved Gaza is not collateral damage. It is a Netanyahu policy

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s war on Gaza stands as a grim testament to the calculated cruelty of his government, with starvation not as an unfortunate consequence of his unwinnable war, but as a deliberate tactic to break the will of the Palestinians in the Strip.

For nearly two years, Israel’s war of destruction has turned cities into cages in a slice of land measuring just 41km by 10km. Netanyahu’s strategy quickly evolved far beyond conventional warfare. With almost three quarters of buildings in the Strip now destroyed or damaged, and at least 60,000 dead, Israel’s insidious siege tactics have hardened into weapons of war, keeping Gazans trapped behind invisible walls, cut off from food and medicine.

These sieges were meticulously orchestrated, with checkpoints manned by Israeli soldiers controlling every inch of supply. As food stocks dwindle and malnutrition spreads, starving civilians bear the brunt of this cruel calculus: force the surrender of Hamas, or face a slow death. Starvation is not collateral damage. It is a policy.

Armageddon endgame

Even Netanyahu’s predecessors have been vocal in their condemnation. Former Israeli prime minister Ehud Olmert likened the so-called ‘humanitarian cities’ in Gaza envisaged by Israel’s defence minister to “concentration camps”, adding that forcing Palestinians inside would amount to ethnic cleansing.

“What (Israel’s Minister for National Security Itamar) Ben Gvir and (Israel’s Finance Minister Bezalel) Smotritch have in mind is Armageddon,” he said last year, speaking to Al Majalla. “We need to know what the endgame is for this war and what the vision is that Israel may have about the future.”

Ronen Zvulun / Reuters
Israeli right wing activists take part in a rally to promote Israel's resettling in Gaza, on the Israeli side of the Israel-Gaza border on July 30, 2025.

Scenes of starvation have led to international public opinion shifting profoundly against Israel in recent days, but so too has the mood among some Israelis, where footage and images from Gaza are significantly limited in Israeli media (and sometimes disbelieved when they are broadcast). Some Israeli public figures have come out against the brutality of siege warfare, starvation, the bombing of hospitals, and the forced displacement of hundreds of thousands of Gazans.

Outpouring of criticism

In a letter to The Guardian on 29 July, high-profile Israeli public figures—including academics, artists, and intellectuals—called for “crippling sanctions” to be imposed on Israel by the international community until it ends its brutality. The signatories include an Academy Award winner, a former Israeli attorney-general, a former speaker of Israel’s parliament, a former head of the Jewish Agency, and several winners of the prestigious Israel Prize.

As food stocks dwindle and malnutrition spreads, starving civilians bear the brunt of this cruel calculus: force the surrender of Hamas, or face a slow death

Opposition leader and former prime minister Yair Lapid said on 28 July that Gaza was a "strategic failure, which has led to operational and diplomatic failure," adding: "If we do not end the war now, the hostages will not return, the IDF will continue to lose its best fighters, the humanitarian disaster will intensify, and the world will shut its doors to Israelis."

Lapid is of the view that the Palestinian-Israeli conflict should be "resolved," but Netanyahu and his far-right coalition partners have outright rejected both a Palestinian state and the internationally-backed recipe for peace that envisages an independent Palestinian state in the Gaza Strip and the West Bank alongside an independent Israel, with Jerusalem as their shared capital.

Part of the plan

Netanyahu justifies the widespread suffering in Gaza—including the destruction of medical facilities and deliberate targeting of high-density urban areas—as necessary to defeat Hamas. "We are fighting a just war, a moral war, a war for our survival," he said in a statement on 28 July. "No country in the world would allow the continued rule, in a neighbouring territory, of a terror group bent on its destruction that already stormed across its borders in a genocidal attack."

Hatem Khaled / Reuters
A Palestinian girl suffering from severe malnutrition receives treatment in the paediatric ward at Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital, where infant formula has nearly run out, on July 28, 2025.

This war goes far beyond military objectives. It is a punishment meted out to an entire two-million-strong civilian population, most of whom would be against the governance of Gaza by Hamas if allowed to speak freely. Netanyahu's tactics have become a blueprint for the political survival. Denying bread and water is no mere symptom of conflict. It is a crime when used deliberately against civilians.

font change