After Munich: US-Russia diplomacy set to kick off in Riyadh

Trump hopes to drive a wedge between Russia and China, seemingly at the expense of European countries who have yet to be included in talks to end the Ukraine war

After Munich: US-Russia diplomacy set to kick off in Riyadh

In February 2007, Russian President Vladimir Putin delivered a speech from the podium at the Munich Security Conference. In the audience just metres away were then-German Chancellor Angela Merkel, then-US Secretary of Defence Robert Gates, and then-Ukrainian President Viktor Yushchenko.

In his speech, Putin warned that NATO’s eastward expansion was “a serious provocation”. Just over a year later, at the NATO Summit in Bucharest in April 2008, members welcomed the aspirations of Georgia and Ukraine for membership and agreed that “these countries will become members of NATO”. Both border Russia.

When Putin spoke in 2007, the American delegation comprised Gates, John McCain, and Joe Lieberman. All three were senior politicians whose views had been formed during the Cold War, so they were wary of Russia. Indeed, Gates had been working at the CIA while Putin was at the KGB.

Two decades later

Fast forward to February 2025. Russia’s ongoing invasion of Ukraine (launched in 2022 in large part due to Russian worries about NATO’s eastward expansion) continues to dominate the international agenda, taking centre stage at security summits like Munich, as well as in bilateral meetings and political conferences.

In 2025, there was no Putin or Russia in Munich (they were not invited). From the US, Vice-President JD Vance told delegates that the biggest threat to Europe’s security came not from Russia or China but “from within”, citing “a retreat from some of (Europe’s) most fundamental values”. The hall stayed silent.

Read more: Vance leaves Europe gobsmacked

Many nations—whether in the Middle East, South America, or Asia—have chosen to keep channels open with both Russia and Ukraine, as have some central and eastern European countries. A recent Romanian election was annulled when it looked like Russian meddling would successfully tip the balance in favour of a pro-Russian candidate. This irked Vance (who used his time in Munich to meet the leader of Germany’s far-right AfD party).

The implications of the Ukraine war extend beyond concerns about NATO's future. It is also about resources and big power relations.

Few in Munich see Vance as a friend—at least on Ukraine. In September 2024, he outlined what he saw as the terms of any settlement: Russia keeps its territorial gains, a demilitarised zone between Russian-occupied Ukraine and the rest of Ukraine is set up (without US forces), and the rest of Ukraine gives Russia "a guarantee of neutrality… no NATO". This, in essence, reflects Putin's demands.

At a recent NATO meeting in Brussels, US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth said any return to Ukraine's 2014 borders was "unrealistic". For foreign policy analysts, it is striking that these positions are being conveyed not informally in private but formally and publicly, through European security platforms and directly to European audiences.

Read more: Trump starts "immediate" talks with Putin on Ukraine

Negotiating positions

Kyiv demands that Russia withdraw to the 2014 borders and that Ukraine be offered NATO membership or an equally binding security guarantee. Trump—who speaks to Putin regularly—advocates for a "realistic approach". The position from Washington, therefore, is to effectively concede Crimea and eastern Ukraine, and to rule out Ukraine joining NATO for the next two decades. 

The Ukrainians see such a settlement as a surrender, so Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was keen to point out that—given the now-wavering US support for Europe—it may be time for a Plan B. He called for the creation of a European armed forces, something most European states would likely rule out. 

Read more: Zelenskyy's big pitch to Munich

The second the Munich Security Conference ended, French President Emmanuel Macron invited European leaders to Paris for an emergency meeting on 17 February, the Americans had announced that they were holding conversations with the Russians in Saudi Arabia about how to stop the war in Ukraine and neither the Ukrainians nor the Europeans were invited. 

After three years, there are intensifying battles between Moscow and Kyiv. Each suspects that talks will soon end this war, and each is manoeuvring to strengthen its negotiating position. Yet this is no mere regional dispute. 

Wider geopolitics

The outcome of Russia's aggression will shape global power dynamics and the future of geopolitics, not least in terms of alliances and zones of influence. Russia is backed by China, North Korea, and Iran, while Ukraine has enjoyed Western support. 

Trump is using his relationship with Putin to weaken Russia-China ties and curb Moscow's cooperation with Iran and North Korea

The significance of the war in Ukraine extends beyond military and geopolitical concerns about NATO's future and the balance of power in Europe. It is also about resources. Ukraine contains vast strategic resources, from the kind of rare earths sought by US tech firms to some of the world's most productive agricultural land.

For Trump, there is a bigger goal: causing a rift in Russia's alliance with China. He is using his relationship with Putin to weaken Russian-Chinese ties and curb Moscow's cooperation with Tehran and Pyongyang. 

The Europeans know they must now recalibrate, given the shifting American stance, and seek alternatives beyond the White House. A European army has not been taken off the table, and most assume that greater financial and military contributions will be needed to fend off Russia's next adventurism. Meanwhile, Trump has set the ball rolling over discussions to end the war in Ukraine (albeit with Ukraine and Europe not currently involved). 

These talks underscore the particular significance of Saudi Arabia's role in hosting the talks, with Trump having suggested the venue, and the Saudi Foreign Ministry having welcomed the prospect. This reaffirms Riyadh's commitment to fostering a lasting peace between Moscow and Kyiv. 

Since 2022, Saudi Arabia has actively engaged with both sides to mediate a political resolution to the crisis. In this evolving geopolitical landscape, Ukraine, Russia, and the US all have a vested interest in Riyadh's diplomatic platform and mediation efforts.

font change