If unverified reports are to be believed, the operation that toppled the Assad regime in Syria had been in the planning for some time, with Turkey and the United States among the countries involved behind the scenes.
In an interview with the Saudi-based Al Hadath channel, Turkey’s Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan denied working with any country or group to plan the operation. He said Turkey only got involved after Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) and others launched their assault on Aleppo—and only then to help make it as bloodless as possible.
In the ‘new Syria,’ HTS and the Kurdish YPG (People’s Defence Units) dominate the stage. HTS, which grew out of al-Qaeda/al-Nusra, has dominated Idlib since 2015, and is a designated terrorist organisation, but appears to have developed ties with Turkey, the US, and other Western countries.
In his new guise, HTS leader Ahmed al-Sharaa has emphasised moderation, stressing “the need to shift from a revolutionary mentality to a statist mentality to govern Syria” and “to establish a state based on law and institutions to ensure sustainable stability.”
HTS intends to be heavily involved in the running of Syria after the transition period, and has been trying to create a new image, distancing itself from its past iterations. Time will show whether its deeds match its words.
The Kurdish question
The Syrian National Army (backed by Turkey) and the YPG have taken positions against each other, waiting for the outcome of talks between their negotiators.
Incoming US President Donald Trump, who resumes his seat in the White House in January, has distanced America from Syria, and may order that US support for armed Kurdish groups be withdrawn, so the YPG and others have had to recalibrate.
Trump seems to respect Erdoğan and thinks Turkey holds the key to Syria, but several US Senators have threatened to slap sanctions on Ankara if the YPG is targeted. Yet again, the debate about US support for the Kurds is raging in Washington policy circles.