My dream for Palestinian statehood

Like Martin Luther King, I, too, have a dream—one of a free Palestine. Biden has a fleeting chance to repair his legacy as an enabler of Israel's genocide in Gaza, but I am not holding my breath.

My dream for Palestinian statehood

At the National Mall in Washington in 1963, civil rights leader Martin Luther King declared: “I have a dream.” They are four of the most famous words of the 20th century. His dream continues to resonate as Americans strive to create a more equitable and just society shorn of systemic racism and discrimination. My own dream relates to the Middle East, which has been plagued by a gross injustice inflicted upon the Palestinian people. If my dream is realised, it can help transform the region into one where its people coexist in peace and prosperity.

If he wishes, Joe Biden can still go down in history as the American president who finally stood with the Palestinians, despite his ardent and unequivocal support for Israel that let it wreak havoc in Gaza, Lebanon and Syria that will forever stain his legacy. Still, most would forgive him if he proved able to help fulfil my dream of restoring peace with a two-state solution. Can this self-declared Zionist rise to the occasion? After all, he is no fan of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu or his extremist government.

If the outgoing president wants to preserve Israel as a home for Jews (as Zionist ideology advocates) while also preserving its democratic character, he has a choice—one that he has sought to avoid, particularly since Israel began waging war on Gaza.

Yet only last week, the US vetoed a watered-down draft resolution from the ten non-permanent members of the UN Security Council that called for an “immediate, unconditional and permanent ceasefire” in Gaza and demanded “the immediate and unconditional release of all hostages”.

The most significant part of the draft included wording loosely reflecting Chapter VII of the UN Charter, which would have determined that "the situation in the Gaza Strip and the regional escalation constitute a threat to international peace and security." Without these words, the resolution is merely a reiteration of past versions. Had this wording been included and the draft adopted, it could have opened the door to coercive measures against Israel if it failed to implement the resolution, as it has for all others.

If he chooses, Biden can still go down in history as the US president who finally recognised a Palestinian state

Time to make amends?

With the staunchly pro-Israel Donald Trump assuming office in January, now might be time for Biden to make amends as the first US president to recognise a Palestinian state, aligning with the vast majority of the international community. Washington would finally come down on the right side of history. More importantly, it would create a new reality that the incoming Trump administration would find difficult to ignore.

The timing of any such action by the Biden administration is crucial given Trump's unabashedly pro-Israel record during his first term, when he moved the US Embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem, recognised Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights, declared that Israel was not an occupying force in the West Bank, defunded the UN agency supporting Palestinians, withdrew the US from UNESCO (because it had taken positions with which Israel disapproved), halted US economic aid to the Palestinian Authority, and closed the Palestinian Mission in Washington. 

Such action by Biden would have precedent. In 2016, in the final days of Barack Obama's tenure, the outgoing president abstained from Resolution 2234, allowing it to pass. This demanded that Israel "immediately and completely cease all settlement activities in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem" because "the cessation of all Israeli settlement activities is essential for salvaging the two-state solution". 

Obama had spent his eight years in office being frustrated by Netanyahu's evasion of any meaningful gesture towards the realisation of the two-state solution—one that he had professed support for in a 2009 speech at Bar Ilan University. So, with just days left in power, Obama let 2234 pass. 

Crucially, this said Israeli settlements built in Palestinian territory since 1967, including East Jerusalem, "have no legal validity and constitute a flagrant violation under international law". Its effect turned out to be symbolic only—the incoming Trump administration proceeded to take all actions in support of Israeli sovereignty over occupied Arab lands—but it laid down a marker. 

Now, Biden could follow Obama's lead. If a Security Council resolution in the coming days were to recognise a Palestinian state and admit it as a full UN member, Biden could order the US representative to abstain.  If he did so, it would be inconceivable that France or the UK would veto it—as both countries already have indicated that they would support the recognition of a Palestinian state in principle. 

Obama's abstention on UN resolution 2234 calling Israeli settlements illegal was symbolic, but it laid down a marker

This would provide a boost for the Palestinian people and would mean that the Security Council could declare any further Israeli settlement of military bases on Palestinian land as violations of sovereignty. It would also add to the legal pressure on Israel. An advisory opinion issued by the International Court of Justice has ruled that Israel's occupation of Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem is illegal, while the International Criminal Court issued arrest warrants for Netanyahu and his former defence minister, Yoav Gallant.

Read more: ICC issues arrest warrants for Netanyahu, Gallant; what Europe does next is important

Honour in abstention

Abstaining on any UN Security Council resolution recognising a Palestinian state would be one of the most significant moments of Biden's presidency and would leave Israel open to an array of legal redress over its actions.

This would not make up for the complicity of the US in the unjustified and tragic loss of life in Gaza and Lebanon, but it would send a clear message internationally (and to Israel) that a Palestinian state is inevitable, emboldening all Israelis who wish to live in peace with their Palestinian neighbours. 

If Biden did so, he would do the Israeli people a huge and historic favour (even though Netanyahu's government would never see it that way). He would be helping them escape from the dystopian idea of an apartheid state stretching at least from the Mediterranean Sea to the Jordan River. 

If my dream is realised—admittedly a big 'if'—change will still take time. The dream King enunciated so eloquently in front of tens of thousands in 1963 is still to fully materialise. A Palestinian state will not be born the day after.

Alas, it is far more likely that Biden will do no such thing, meaning that he will go down in history as the US president who helped Israel commit genocide against the Palestinian people. Because in Gaza, there are no dreams—only nightmares.

font change