The situation in the Gaza Strip remains dire, with Palestinian parties appearing indifferent to the welfare of citizens and the future of the nation.
A telling example occurred when Palestinian Prime Minister Mohammad Shtayyeh offered his resignation to President Mahmoud Abbas (Abu Mazen), who subsequently reappointed the same government to serve in a caretaker capacity.
There is considerable speculation about appointing Mohammad Mustafa, the head of the Palestine Investment Fund, as Prime Minister.
Should this occur, it's unlikely to herald any significant change. Rather, it could introduce further complications for the cause, the people, and the Palestinian Authority (PA).
Most critically, such a government, if formed, would be ill-equipped to tackle essential tasks, including the reconstruction of the Gaza Strip.
Amid these developments, there is anticipation for the Moscow meeting of parties, intended to exert maximum pressure on Hamas to relinquish some of its demands.
Yet, the forthcoming meeting is not promising.
Hamas has threatened to dismiss a government led by Mohammad Mustafa and to establish alternative structures in the Gaza Strip, separate from the West Bank—a move that is not advisable.
These events might have been predictable and understandable before the war and the resultant catastrophic conditions.
However, given the current dire circumstances, such manoeuvres are utterly inadmissible and demand serious accountability for those at fault.
What is urgently needed is a significant and comprehensive reform of the Palestinian political system.
This includes transitioning the presidency from a controlling entity to a ceremonial role and establishing a government with full authority over both the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.
This transition should pave the way for general elections, as free and fair voting remains the sole solution to resolving Palestinian issues.
Rather than confronting the harsh and unpleasant reality with genuine solutions, we observe manoeuvres and tactical ploys designed solely to maintain the status quo.
These actions aim to perpetuate current power dynamics, enjoy authority without substantive change, and, notably, depend on Israeli support.