The economic impact of Israel's war on Gaza

The repercussions and costs will largely depend on how the conflict unfolds

While the human toll of the war has been insufferable, the economic repercussions are also devastating and may be irreversible.
Sebastien Thibault
While the human toll of the war has been insufferable, the economic repercussions are also devastating and may be irreversible.

The economic impact of Israel's war on Gaza

As Israel's war on Gaza drags on, the human cost of the conflict is immense and rising. But along with the violence and death, there is an economic backdrop that could prove volatile and difficult to reverse.

On the macroeconomic landscape, the global economy is teetering towards recession, as low growth and persistent inflationary pressure, especially on food and fuel, combine with high borrowing costs, lack of fiscal space for many indebted economies, competitive industrial policy in renewables that may detract from decarbonisation incentives in the developing world.

In oil markets, prices are rising due to the conflict and concern over insurance costs if the conflict spreads in the region.

There is also an open threat from Iran and its request for other OPEC members to embargo oil exports to Israel. Israel, of course, does not purchase oil from Iran, but it is an oil importer.

The threat is more of a reminder of the politics of the 1973 embargo and a fear of the weaponisation of oil in global markets. More broadly, price differentials in oil sales from Iran and Russia due to sanctions and price cap mechanisms continue to be a burden for other OPEC members to balance, with producer Saudi Arabia continuing its own cuts to try and balance prices. Oil futures rose 3% on the news of Israel's strike on Gaza's Al-Ahli Baptist Hospital to $93 per barrel on Tuesday.

AP
Wounded Palestinians await treatment at Al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City, central Gaza Strip, Tuesday, October 17, 2023.

In pictures: Hospitals are no longer safe as Israel continues its war on Gaza

While energy markets are the first point of economic reaction to a volatile and incendiary regional conflict, there are longer-term risks to consider.

Shrinking access to capital

Access to capital is shrinking for many lower-income economies as borrowing costs surge, and investors turn away from emerging markets in fear of an already weak global outlook and a regional downturn.

Access to capital is shrinking for many lower-income economies as borrowing costs surge, and investors turn away from emerging markets in fear of an already weak global outlook and a regional downturn.

Existing debt, mainly in the form of government bonds and sukuks in the Middle East, is already taking a hit as their values slide in trading. Reports that Middle Eastern sovereign bonds have been among global bonds' worst performers this week, with Dubai's notes that mature in 2043 sliding 3 cents on the dollar, their lowest value in the last 11 months.

Saudi and Bahraini bonds also declined.

If this is the case for regional governments with good to excellent credit ratings, those with weaker credit will see existing debt discounted in trading and access to new debt become more expensive and possibly more difficult to attract investors.

Saudi Arabia has been actively going to bond investors successfully this year and has announced plans to issue a new Islamic bond or sukuk from its Public Investment Fund. 

This new bond offering will be a bellwether of investor sentiment and a read on how the markets see the potential spillover effects of the war in Israel and Gaza onto the Gulf states.

In the last year, the PIF has easily borrowed from international capital markets, with a $17bn loan in November 2022. The fund has also benefited from a capital injection with a transfer of shares from Aramco worth $80bn.

Index funds down

Another signal of economic impact will be in index funds for emerging market-based equities, meaning firms listed on regional stock exchanges included in major indices, such as the MSCI.

Emerging market stocks in MSCI are down nearly 1% this week, related to tensions in the Middle East and possible spillover conflict. It is difficult to tease out evidence of a global downturn from a regional downturn directly related to the conflict in Israel and Gaza.

Still, market sentiment on both seems downward in direction.

Economists at Bloomberg recently modelled three widening scenarios (contained to Gaza/Israel, regional proxy war, and Iran-Israel direct conflict) for the impact on global GDP from the Israel-Gaza war. There could be a fourth scenario they do not model in which the conflict is global in scope.

In all scenarios, inflation is persistent globally and growth mediocre, with a direct war between Israel and Iran pushing global inflation to 7% in 2024.

Sebastien Thibault

The Bloomberg model estimates a 2024 global growth rate in the direct conflict scenario is about 1.7%. Though this is positive, it still denotes global recession and the lowest rate of global expansion since 1982.

Economists at Bloomberg recently modelled three widening scenarios (contained to Gaza/Israel, regional proxy war, and Iran-Israel direct conflict) for the impact on global GDP from the Israel-Gaza war.  In all scenarios, inflation is persistent globally and growth mediocre, with a direct war between Israel and Iran pushing global inflation to 7% in 2024.

This point on widening conflict gets to a fracturing already visible economic decoupling, as Europe and the US de-risk from China.

Still, China and its view of emerging markets evolve on both political and economic ties. Putin's participation in the Global Belt and Road Conference marked a new effort at what he described as a "north-south corridor" of connectivity.

AFP
Russia's President Vladimir Putin speaks during a press conference on the sidelines of the final day of the Belt and Road Forum in Beijing on April 27, 2019.

Geographically, the linkage of the Russian landmass across northern Asia to its southern mass in China is strategic, but the politics are much broader in their partnership efforts.

Stalemate in global diplomatic efforts

The decoupling effect, low growth or recession scenarios, and extremely high borrowing costs led to a stalemate in two significant global diplomatic efforts underway.

The first is on climate negotiations at COP 28, where it becomes increasingly difficult to pare demands from emerging market economies for their energy needs (especially among oil and gas producers and those with domestic coal supplies) with across-the-board calls for decarbonisation in the power sector.

There simply will not be the finance available for new power or the fiscal space for major changes to the energy mix. 

Second, the global diplomatic effort on debt restructuring and debt relief will be hampered by a lack of coordination between multilateral development banks, China as a lender, and Western governments and private financial institutions that may be willing to take a haircut on repayments.

These issues of climate and debt restructuring, of course, are not caused by the conflict in Gaza and Israel. However, the conflict makes global dealmaking and cooperation more difficult, and the rising risk scenario in energy markets is directly related to regional peace and stability.

The immediate dangers of a widening conflict also go beyond the region, as the threat of energy insecurity and fiscal sustainability will plague governance for many countries worldwide.

font change

Related Articles