Western guilt over Holocaust informs its support for Israel

The West’s guilt at the horrendous pogroms in wartime Europe stops it from challenging Israel’s attempt to decimate Gaza

Western guilt over Holocaust informs its support for Israel

References to the Holocaust have been made in parts of the discourse on the war in Gaza since it began.

Media articles and statements by politicians and academics have drawn parallels between the Hamas attacks on Israeli civilians and the far-reaching campaign that Adolf Hitler launched to erase the Jewish presence from the lands that Germany controlled during World War II.

Numerous Israeli writers – including Tova Herzl in the Tel Aviv daily newspaper Yedioth Ahronoth – have warned against making comparisons with the Holocaust, arguing that it diminishes the unique history it holds.

But the intention behind these comparisons extends beyond drawing parallels between the experiences of residents of Gaza and the suffering of European Jews during the Nazi era.

Instead, the aim is to justify the severity of the Israeli response, which has gone as far as to raise the possibility of the destruction of Gaza and the displacement of its population into Egypt's Sinai desert. And there have been words from senior Israeli figures that have dehumanised Gazans, with Defence Minister Yoav Galant calling them "human animals."

Without exception, every discussion about the Holocaust requires a sensitive and careful approach to avoid being seen as promoting anti-Semitism or encouraging hostility towards Jewish people.

However, it is essential to acknowledge that a significant portion of the Arab population and Arab leaders have not incorporated the Holocaust into their intellectual and political framework for dealing with Israel. Instead, their positions on it have been unclear.

Official European policy

The Holocaust was primarily a crime committed by European nations against European Jews. Although some Arab groups expressed support for Nazi Germany before and during World War II, it doesn't equate to the widespread anti-Semitism that became official policy in several European countries during the 1930s and 1940s, leading to Hitler’s horrific extermination camps.

The Holocaust was primarily a crime committed by European nations against European Jews. Widespread anti-Semitism became official policy in several European countries during the 1930s and 1940s, leading to Hitler's horrific extermination camps.

The attacks on Jews in Arab countries – ranging from the Al-Farhud incident in Iraq to events in the Levant, Egypt, and Morocco – share similarities with the pogroms incited by Tsarist Russia and others for political reasons.

Different historical contexts

These parallels in no way diminish the seriousness of the injustices suffered by Jews in Arab countries. But they have a different historical context from the crimes of the Holocaust, especially in light of the Nazi leadership's adoption of what it called the "Final Solution" in 1942.

Some Arab and Palestinian factions failed to fully appreciate the profound impact of the Holocaust on shaping Israeli identity, and its role in justifying Israel's existence as a Jewish state.

They also did not fully understand the strong commitment of the right wing of Israeli politics to the Jewish character of the state, which amounts to a matter of faith.

These factions – either by lack of awareness or by deliberate intent – inadvertently lent support to what is known as the Holocaust Industry, the title of a widely known book by Norman Finkelstein, which defines the exploitation of the historical suffering of the Jews.

And however it came about, this factor has contributed to the deadlock in the Arab-Israeli conflict, perpetuating extremism and obstructing opportunities for political resolution or peaceful settlement.

 The West – which has a dark history of committing massive crimes through systematic ethnic cleansing against Jews as a religious and cultural group – seeks international support for its stance on approving Israel's imposition of illegal collective punishment on 2.3 million Palestinians in Gaza.

Shifted struggle

The Arabs and Palestinians have observed that their struggle has shifted –seemingly without their full understanding – from being a national liberation movement fought by those who had their land taken and were forced into exile to becoming part of a campaign for salvation, also along religious lines, with no clear prospect of resolution, at least at present.

To grasp the differing perspectives of the West and the Arab world on the situation in Gaza, considering the distinct historical backgrounds is important.

The West – which has a dark history of committing massive crimes through systematic ethnic cleansing against Jews as a religious and cultural group – seeks international support for its stance on approving Israel's imposition of illegal collective punishment on 2.3 million Palestinians in Gaza.

Despite some Arabs not fully comprehending the significance of the Holocaust – and others avoiding politically costly propaganda related to it – they view the Palestinian-Israeli conflict as a distinct issue, separate from the Western view of history, rooted in the World War II era and the long period of anti-Semitism in the West.

The hysterical reaction to the United Nations Secretary General's statement that "the attacks by Hamas did not happen in a vacuum" fits into the broader strategy of preventing any narrative that contextualises the events in the Middle East separately from the European and Western relations with Jews.

Relevant comparisons

But the reason the West backs Israel, and its limited context on the Hamas attacks as defined by Benjamin Netanyahu, is because wartime history, in effect, overlaps with current events: modern-day support for Israel can be traced to regret at Europe's role in the Holocaust. It is a defining factor in the West's response, and so a relevant part of the context.

This comes at a significant cost to the Palestinians of today, in terms of civilian casualties, the destruction of their cities, and the displacement of their people from their lands once again.

The hysterical reaction to the United Nations Secretary General's statement that "the attacks by Hamas did not happen in a vacuum" fits into the broader strategy of preventing any narrative that contextualises the events in the Middle East separately from the European and Western relations with Jews.

font change