Could OPEC soul-searching lead to a shift in its headquarters?

The oil exporter’s group was without a speaker from its host government at a recent set-piece event, over allegations of compromised press freedom, raising questions over its choice of home

Could OPEC soul-searching lead to a shift in its headquarters?

A snub from a senior member of the Austrian government to a major event held in Vienna by OPEC, which is based there, has thrown the spotlight back on media coverage of the oil exporters’ organisation.

The Financial Times reported that the Austrian foreign minister, Alexander Schallenberg, refrained from attending OPEC’s set-piece eighth International Seminar held in Vienna last week after some media outlets were banned from attending by organisers.

Earlier, Reuters reported that OPEC blocked its journalists and others from Bloomberg and The Wall Street Journal from the event.

Schallenberg was scheduled to speak at this global event, designed to bring together producers and consumers under the banner “Towards a Sustainable and Inclusive Energy Transition”, in one of the most important days on the global energy agenda.

The minister’s office said the decision not to attend was due to “agenda” issues, saying it had never told OPEC that he would attend and that his name had been added to the event’s schedule by mistake. But it also stressed the importance of press freedom.

The FT quoted the foreign minister’s spokesman as saying “media freedom” including “coverage of political developments,” is “the cornerstone of any democratic society”.

The lack of Austria’s participation — long a feature of OPEC’s gatherings of this kind — stood out all the more with the eighth International Seminar also the first to be held since the Covid-19 pandemic.

In an earlier Al Majalla article, I referred to the organisation’s decision to some media organisations from a different Vienna meeting – of OPEC+ – the wider alliance of oil exporters. I argued the decision was not sudden and followed a run of misleading or speculative reporting from these well-known outlets.

The lack of Austria's participation — long a feature of OPEC's gatherings of this kind — stood out all the more with the eighth International Seminar also the first to be held since the Covid-19 pandemic.

A media snub rather than a ban

This time around, at the eighth OPEC International Seminar, these news organisations were not barred from attending. Rather, they were not invited as official media partners — a status which went to other organisations and related to the conference's main events on energy sustainability, security, investments, and innovation.

It could be that the media organisations concerned are using their ban on attending the previous OPEC+ meeting as an excuse to not cover the conference – claiming that they haven't been invited to participate like other media.

Sending a message

Although the Austrian foreign minister's office didn't say it explicitly, its message could be seen as political. Is it reasonable for the minister to make the mistake of not attending the periodic conference in his country?

Or was the decision not to attend only a personal act, which, in political protocol, could be interpreted as a new approach that the Austrian government may take?

It all raises other significant questions, especially in light of the government's total non-interference in other Vienna-based international organisations, including the International Atomic Energy Agency, the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation,  and the United Nations Industrial Development Organisation.

This time around, at the eighth OPEC International Seminar, these news organisations were not barred from attending. Rather, they were not invited as official media partners.

A precedent of organisations leaving Vienna

Vienna's global groups play an important role in promoting international cooperation and achieving common global goals. While the Austrian capital's reputation as a good choice for such organisations is established, international organisations also have a history of changing their headquarters and leaving the Austrian capital.

These include the International Renewable Energy Agency, which opened its new headquarters in Abu Dhabi, the United Arab Emirates, in 2015; The International Organization for Migration, which was based in Vienna since 1952 but decided to move its headquarters to Geneva, in 2011; and the International Telecommunication Union which also left Vienna for Geneva in 1996 after 23 years.

Could OPEC, one of the most well-known international organisations, follow after the snub from Austria's foreign minister over the eighth International Seminar?

Development comes amid OPEC soul-searching

Schallenberg's lack of attendance will have sent an important signal to OPEC. And it comes as the group looks to be in need of new thinking, a new structure, and a new media approach. Perhaps it could encourage it to also look for a new home.

Schallenberg's lack of attendance will have sent an important signal to OPEC. And it comes as the group looks to be in need of new thinking, a new structure, and a new media approach.

Any move would not be the first in OPEC's history, it was founded in Geneva in 1960 and based there for five years. If it is considering its future, there are some important questions raised by recent events. 

Has Austria's government ever before seemed to side with the critics of the other international organisations based in Vienna?

Is there a deeper political motive – beyond the supposed media ban­ –  behind its refusal to attend the eighth International Seminar, especially with Russia's invasion of Ukraine in its second year?

Does the Austrian government mean to signal that OPEC is no longer welcome in Vienna?

Will the consequences of the Austrian government's political approach to OPEC be examined?

Answers to them should feed into OPEC's plans.

OPEC's secretariat may have withheld an invitation to some media but didn't ban their attendance.

The way the outlets reacted may have been intended to distort OPEC's image, which seems to justify the organisation's stance towards these parts of the media.

The central question remains: Did the Austrian government use this as an excuse to not attend the conference? Or was a deeper political motivation the reason?

font change