The age of soft power is officially over

It is evident that the world is undergoing significant transformations. The conflict in Ukraine is ongoing, and similar situations may arise in the future, such as the potential tensions over Taiwan.

The age of soft power is officially over

By the end of the Cold War and the collapse of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s, intellectuals and politicians championed the concept of "soft power," advocating for an end to the "clash of civilisations" and a departure from the arms race, with the notion that the robust American model had triumphed over the feeble Soviet one.

During this time, US President George H. Bush preached to both allies and opponents that reducing defence spending would contribute to social welfare and economic prosperity.

In the early 1990s, he claimed that humanity could reap the benefits of peace by downsizing defence budgets. Consequently, the United States shifted from allocating 6 percent to 3 percent of its GDP towards defence throughout the 1990s.

It seemed only natural for this shift to occur. After all, the American model had prevailed over "Sovietisation," resulting in the worldwide diffusion of prosperity. Everyone desired to consume McDonald's sandwiches and drink Starbucks coffee, symbolising the end of the "evil" Soviet Union and the collapse of the Eastern Bloc, achieved without a single shot being fired. This, in part, fuelled investments in technology, the economy, and the virtual world.

Litmus test

However, September 11 presented a severe challenge to these ideas. The concepts and proclamations of soft power quickly faded away with the US invasion of Iraq in 2003, as it proved to be a litmus test.

The person who dealt a blow to this theory was none other than the son of US President George Bush, who had initially advocated for it. The excess of American power propelled the nation to turn against itself and its own theories.

Read more: How the fall of Baghdad changed the world

For years, the world witnessed a fluctuation between the theories of "soft power," which focused on economics and markets, and "smart power," which combined military strength with diplomacy.

Ukraine war triggers arms race

However, this equilibrium was disrupted when Russia decided to invade Ukraine in 2022. The war in Ukraine quickly escalated, fuelled by the tensions between the United States and China, as well as various regional conflicts.

This escalation elevated the reliance on "hard power" and triggered an unprecedented arms race among major and regional powers. In terms of numbers, global defence spending increased by approximately 4 percent last year, reaching a staggering $2 trillion, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

Russia's war on Ukraine elevated the reliance on "hard power" and triggered an unprecedented arms race among major and regional powers. In terms of numbers, global defence spending increased by approximately 4 percent last year, reaching a staggering $2 trillion, according to the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute.

The goal advocated by former US President Donald Trump, which called for Nato members to allocate two percent of their gross domestic product to the alliance's budget, has now become a reality.

Even countries that were apprehensive about "militarisation" due to their troubled past and military defeats are now leading the way in embracing the "hard power" theory.

Germany, for instance, has committed to allocating two percent of its output to support Nato, while Poland plans to increase its share to 4 percent. Furthermore, Japan aims to raise defence expenditures by two-thirds over the next four years.

Read more: Pacifist Japan grows more assertive amid Russia, China adventurism

Defence expenditures are projected to reach $700 billion per year. India plans to increase its defence budget by 50 percent in response to China's significant military advancements, which include strengthening its army, navy, hypersonic missiles, drones, and asserting control over space and the virtual world.

Over the past decade, China's defence budget has grown by approximately 75% in real terms. The US Congress has also recommended an increase in defence spending while strengthening regional alliances Japan, Australia and Britain to counter China's influence.

This current climate has led to an arms race, with nuclear weapons being brandished, a race for military dominance in space, and a race to "militarise" artificial intelligence.  

This current climate has led to an arms race, with nuclear weapons being brandished, a race for military dominance in space, and a race to "militarise" artificial intelligence. 

Three worrisome trends

The world is experiencing significant turmoil due to the decline of American power and the shift from unipolarity to multipolarity with the rise of China. These dynamics contribute to three concerning trends in the coming years.

Firstly, there is a growing sense of uncertainty in both major and regional countries, leading to more aggressive tendencies and a reliance on force to strengthen their positions and expand across borders. Examples of this can be seen in Turkey and Iran, which have engaged in expansionist activities and incursions into multiple countries, from Syria and Iraq to Ukraine.

Secondly, internal conflicts are on the rise, accompanied by the emergence of military roles, coups, and competition among local factions supported by external, regional, and international actors.

This is further fuelled by the competition between different international models, where the American model is no longer the sole dominant force, and Chinese, Russian, and other models have gained influence. The proliferation of coups and attempted coups worldwide is a testament to this trend, with the intense conflict in Sudan between the army and the Rapid Support Forces being a recent example.

Read more: The war in Sudan is really a battle over spoils

Thirdly, investments, funds, and innovation are shifting from scientific and economic sectors to military domains, as private arms companies become key suppliers for major defence ministries. 

Investments, funds, and innovation are shifting from scientific and economic sectors to military domains, as private arms companies become key suppliers for major defence ministries.

Furthermore, investors are venturing into new sectors, including space control. An indicator of this shift is the rise in the value of stocks of arms companies worldwide.

It is evident that the world is undergoing significant transformations. The conflict in Ukraine is ongoing, and similar situations may arise in the future, such as the potential tensions over Taiwan.

Enormous amounts of money will be spent, lives will be lost, and major geopolitical shifts will occur before a new global formula emerges, marked by new regional alliances and maps different from those witnessed in the past decades.

font change