China’s peace diplomacy sets example for world

The Ukraine crisis has presented an opportunity for a stronger and more inclusive Europe

China’s peace diplomacy sets example for world

China’s peace diplomacy has recently come under spotlight. In early March, the China-brokered diplomatic deal that successfully reestablished relations between Iran and Saudi Arabia boosted China’s role in resolving international tensions.

Read more: Why China is mediating in the Middle East

This move by China is significant because, for a long time, China has been known for being reactive to international developments, as part of its global strategy. The proactivity demonstrated by China in the Iran-Saudi deal is a reflection of the pragmatism of its Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence that China has followed in its dealings with other nations.

This strategy has proven to be more effective in paving a constructive path to conflict resolution. By contrast, counter-terrorism operations and proxy wars — started and led by the US in the Middle East in the name of security — have proven to be nothing more than a self-interested approach.

A proactive Beijing

China’s more proactive approach has led to increased global speculation over Beijing’s role in resolving the Ukraine crisis. So far, China has maintained a neutral position and has refrained from siding with any country, outright.

While China enjoys a harmonious and strategic relationship with Russia, it remains committed to its principle of non-interference. Moreover, its neutral and non-confrontational position allows China to define its own view of the Russia-Ukraine conflict.

While China enjoys a harmonious and strategic relationship with Russia, it remains committed to its principle of non-interference.

Moreover, its neutral and non-confrontational position allows China to define its own view of the Russia-Ukraine conflict, which was outlined in an official document in February titled: China's Position on the Political Settlement of the Ukraine Crisis" released in February.

In March, Chinese President Xi Jinping visited Russia at the invitation of Russian President Vladimir Putin, marking the Chinese leader's first state visit following the 20th National Congress.

The meeting came one year into the Russia-Ukraine crisis, leading many to speculate on the potential dynamics the deepened Comprehensive Strategic Partnership of Coordination between the two countries might bring into the ongoing crisis.

In early April, President Xi received a French delegation led by President Emmanuel Macron in Beijing as the latter paid his first state visit to China in three years.

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen's presence was short and quiet compared to Macron's high-profile visit. This somehow reflects the fact that the European Union and its members states — particularly those with an aspiration of strategic autonomy — do not always align with each other.

Read more: Leaving Paris in flames, Macron heads to Beijing

Before the outbreak of Covid-19 in 2019, I had the chance to visit Europe and held several conversations with relevant fellows in Europe. In particular, I raised the policy concept of "strategic autonomy" in our conversations and pitched questions on how the policy concept should be understood.

Importance of strategic autonomy

The conversations reinforced my belief that the pursuit of strategic autonomy is something fundamental. It is embedded in a state's DNA.  The pursuit of strategic autonomy of a state is dependent on how it strategically positions itself in the overall international landscape to serve its needs.

This explains why the concept of strategic autonomy has been evolving in the past decade within the EU and has only been revived now by President Macron who publicly called to build strategic autonomy on his way back to France after his state visit to China.

It seems like an opportune time for a leading European state like France to seriously pursue strategic autonomy. The Ukraine crisis — which is Europe's most significant geopolitical challenge at the moment — could make Europe stronger and more inclusive

It seems like an opportune time for a leading European state like France to seriously pursue strategic autonomy. The Ukraine crisis — which is Europe's most significant geopolitical challenge at the moment — could make Europe stronger and more inclusive.

Read more: It's a brave new world for China, Russia and Europe

Though President von der Leyen seems to see China's role in resolving the Ukraine crisis as only supplementary, President Macron seemed to be envisioning a bigger China role in the process.

While China will allow European states to reach their own consensus, it remains committed to being a constructive and pragmatic player. A resolution to the Ukraine conflict needs China, but also needs more than just China.

-Becky Shen, CEO, BP Solutions Ltd, a Chinese consulting firm that provides solutions to enterprises participating in the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI)

font change