Pressure mounts on Iran from all corners: will it survive?

The US and its Western allies seem determined to use every instrument at its disposal—security, economic and military—to topple Ali Khamenei's regime

Pressure mounts on Iran from all corners: will it survive?

Pro-government demonstrations in Iran indicate that the West’s hasty predictions of the imminent collapse of the Iranian regime may be premature. Hundreds of thousands have marched in support of the ruling system, despite economic and political failure, and despite the disintegration of the regional 'axis of resistance' in which Iran has invested for over three decades.

For his part, US President Donald Trump has openly called on Iranians to "keep protesting and take over state institutions," adding that "help is on its way. He also announced a 25% tariff increase on countries that continue to trade with Iran. For his part, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz declared that the government in Tehran "is nearing its end" and that "the Iranian leadership is living its final days."

This came amid a wave of diplomatic protests, as Iranian ambassadors in Western capitals were summoned over the escalating use of force against demonstrators. In Israel, meanwhile, public discourse is dominated by threats, military planning and the identification of future targets for airstrikes.

While anti-government protests may not signal the imminent end of the regime, what distinguishes these demonstrations from those of the past is the convergence of chronic economic failure and the weakening of its 'axis'. This project aimed to shield Iran from external threats by establishing buffer zones in countries such as Iraq, Lebanon, Syria and Yemen. These areas were intended to prevent war from reaching Iranian soil, as it did during the conflict with Iraq between 1980 and 1988, and to divert Iran’s adversaries into engagements far from its borders.

Pro-government demonstrations in Iran indicate that the West's hasty predictions of the imminent collapse of the Iranian regime may be premature

Whether the economic collapse—evident in the Iranian currency's fall to record lows—is caused by structural flaws rooted in the regime's nature, its socio-economic policies, its mismanagement of resources and widespread corruption, or whether it stems from decades of Western-led sanctions and embargoes that blocked investment and deepened isolation, the result is clear: citizens are struggling to meet their most basic needs.

Utilising the entire toolbox

For their part, the United States and Israel are doing all they can to ensure the current protests succeed in toppling the government that has ruled since 1979. The US and its Western allies seem determined to use every instrument at its disposal—security, economic and military—to achieve this goal.

The outsized emphasis on Reza Pahlavi, the son of the last Shah, as a potential alternative may stem from the perceived need to offer a substitute, particularly at a time when prominent figures from the internal opposition—especially those linked to the 2009 Green Movement—have remained largely silent. Their reluctance likely reflects their own ties to the very system many now seek to dismantle.

As Iran reels under domestic and foreign pressure, it should not expect big powers like Russia and China to come to its rescue

This raises serious questions: do the majority of Iranians truly favour the complete overthrow of the regime at any cost, or are they seeking conditional settlements and negotiated reforms, as happened following the 2022 "Woman, Life, Freedom" protests over the hijab and personal freedoms?

Historic opportunity

The US clearly views this moment as a historic opportunity to remove Iran's Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and dismantle his regime. Yet that alone cannot capture the complexity of a nation of over 90 million people, covering 1.6 million square kilometres, and situated at a strategic crossroads of enduring global significance.

But will any nation come to Tehran's rescue? It is unlikely. China and Russia, cited as important allies of Iran, are likely to treat Iran as Iran once treated its former ally, Bashar al-Assad, and Hezbollah in Lebanon: useful when needed, dispensable when not.

font change