From Nixon and Mao to Trump and Xi

Nixon and Mao met to break the wall of hostility during the Cold War; Trump and Xi meet to manage their mutual dependence in an era of multipolarity

From Nixon and Mao to Trump and Xi

In February 1972, Richard Nixon stepped into the heart of Communist China at a time when hostility between the two countries was at its height. The bold visit—more than halfway into the Cold War—was aimed at defining roles and delineate spheres of influence between China and the United States.

The US president understood that politics was the art of managing enmity, not declaring it. He feared not distant horizons nor the Silk Road and treated contradiction as an opportunity. With a single handshake, he initiated the first steps towards healing the East-West divide.

Mao, meanwhile, stood in the autumn of his revolution. His body was weary, his principles stretched, but his mind remained sharp. He knew that revolutions that fail to ride the winds of change perish with their children.

To Mao, Nixon’s visit was a late recognition of the Chinese dragon—a breath of oxygen into a house suffocating on its own slogans. He knew when to wield ideology, when to sheath it, and when to hang it on the wall. That handshake wasn’t a sign of repentance, nor surrender, but the first bandage on a wounded nation.

Impulse vs measure

From that meeting, the world emerged transformed. The fog of the Cold War slowly began to lift, and the arteries of trade and diplomacy pulsed again. One handshake altered the course of globalisation—before the term itself existed. A new China was born from the womb of American realism, and Washington—with an eye on Moscow—began to see Beijing as a force it could no longer ignore.

A half century later, winds have changed, actors have been replaced, but the carpet remains. In Washington, Donald Trump inherits the imperial mantle; in Beijing, Xi Jinping extends the revolutionary hand.

Times have changed, tools have evolved, but the meet is just another attempt to numb the birth pains of a new global order

Impusle vs measure

Trump is cut from a different cloth than Nixon—not of statesmen and institutions, but of deals, tariffs, jabs, and handshakes. He sees politics as a marketplace for bargaining. He moves through storms unafraid, convinced that the winds will favour him. But when he launched his trade war, he faced a rude awakening: the global arteries of trade run just as much through Beijing as they do through New York, and he cannot cut those arteries without bleeding America.

By contrast, Xi Jinping carries the weight of ancient civilisations, builds power through patience and discipline, and is wise enough to understand that storms pass. He speaks softly but moves forcefully, like a quiet current carving riverbanks. He manages conflict with Washington through measured steps, not impulsive tweets—offering small concessions for greater gains, pulling strings without breaking them.

And while Nixon and Mao met to break the wall of hostility during the Cold War, Trump and Xi meet to manage mutual dependence in a multipolar world. 

Back then, America used China as a counterweight to Moscow. Today, China uses America to prove that the centre of gravity has shifted east. Between those handshakes, the tools of power have changed—from armies and missiles to algorithms, platforms, drones, and control over trade, energy, knowledge, and AI.

Times have changed, tools have evolved, but it's the same dance. The summits—from 1972 to present day—are recurring attempts to numb the birth pains of a new global order.

font change