The Middle East after October 7: a new map and a major loser

The region stands at a crossroads that will define its course for at least the next decade

The Middle East after October 7: a new map and a major loser

Two years ago, on October 7 2023, Hamas launched attacks on the Gaza envelope, triggering a political and security earthquake whose aftershocks continue to reverberate across the region.

For Al Majalla, the second anniversary demands pause and reflection. This wasn't just a confrontation between Hamas and Israel; it was a watershed moment that ushered in a new phase in the region. The Middle East After October 7 is the cover story of Al Majalla’s October issue, dedicated to analysing the shift in the regional power balance that took place in the past two years as well as identifying the winners and losers.

Since that day, events have unfolded at a lightning pace. Wars have not ceased. Diplomatic initiatives did not dry up—some succeeded, others remained aspirational. New maps have yet to be drawn, but one thing is clear: Iran’s regional axis is weaker.

Israeli strikes in Gaza and Lebanon quickly spread to Damascus, Baghdad, Sanaa, and even Tehran. Sites and depots were destroyed; senior commanders were killed. Tehran’s allies found themselves locked in costly, protracted confrontations. In Iraq, the Popular Mobilisation Forces were put on the defensive. In Lebanon, Hezbollah became embroiled in a war of attrition in the south that culminated in Beirut. In Yemen, the Houthis were cornered between military assaults and mounting political pressure.

Biggest blow

The biggest blow for Tehran came on 8 December, when President Bashar al-Assad was ousted from power in Damascus. Al-Assad was more than an ally; he was the cornerstone of Iran’s westward expansion, its strategic corridor to Lebanon and the Mediterranean. His fall delivered a strategic shock to the Supreme Leader, depriving Tehran of its most vital arm of influence and one of its most steadfast allies in decades. With the loss of Syria, the so-called “Axis of Resistance” lost a central pillar, leaving it more isolated and less influential in the regional equation.

New maps have yet to be drawn, but one thing is clear: Iran's regional axis is weaker

But even as Iran emerges as the greatest loser, this does not mean the axis has collapsed entirely. Its costs have risen, its momentum has ebbed, and its image as a rising force has eroded.

Nowhere was this more evident than in the inability of Iran's "proxies" and "allies" to defend Iran and its nuclear programme against Israeli and American strikes in mid-year. Even inside Iran, debates have intensified over the wisdom of such foreign entanglements at a time when the economy faces deep challenges and public pressure continues to mount.

A stunning rebound

Israel, by contrast, swiftly repositioned itself. While it suffered an existential shock on October 7, and while its security image was damaged, initially giving the impression that Iran's axis had landed a major blow, over the following two years, Israel reasserted itself as a key regional player. It escalated operations against Iranian outposts and deepened cooperation with partners who view engagement with Israel as either a security guarantee or a path to technological advancement.

Despite frequent disputes with Washington, Israel retained America's steadfast support, reinforced by Donald Trump's return to the White House. It also gained greater prominence in European and Asian strategic considerations.

Yet the domestic front remained unstable. Benjamin Netanyahu faced corruption charges, rising opposition pressure, and sharp social divisions. His internal image was tarnished, even as he sought to project that of a strongman abroad and redraw the map of the Middle East.

Despite frequent disputes with Washington, Israel retained America's steadfast support, reinforced by Donald Trump's return to the White House

Netanyahu's ambiguous relationship with Trump further complicated matters. While he leaned on the legacy of Trump's first term and the Abraham Accords, he also recognised that Trump's return brought both opportunities and risks. The latest came when Trump announced from the White House a plan to halt the "mad war" that for two years has exacted a devastating toll on civilians through displacement, death, and starvation. This reshuffled the deck, exposing how the future of Gaza has become a bargaining chip among global and regional powers, no longer merely an issue between Hamas and Israel.

Glimmers of hope

There were glimmers of hope. Chief among them was the success of the Saudi–French initiative to convene an international summit for a two-state solution on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly. The summit secured recognition of a Palestinian state from countries including France, the United Kingdom, and Canada.

Today, two years on, it is fair to say the Middle East is no longer what it once was. Ironically, the conflict is no longer just a Palestinian–Israeli affair. Gaza has become a testing ground for far broader power struggles: between Iran and Israel, between regional players vying to assert influence, and between global powers redrawing their priorities amid crises from Ukraine to East Asia.

The question now is not merely about Gaza; it is about who holds the upper hand in the new Middle East. The region stands at a crossroads that will define its course for at least the next decade.

By exploring the issue, we are not commemorating a past event; we are trying to understand a shifting present and lay out all possibilities for the future.

font change