Israeli and Iranian claims of victory ring hollow

Netanyahu did not realise his goal of ending Iran’s nuclear programme and regime change, and Iran stood alone in its war with Israel, as global and regional allies left it to fend for itself

Israeli and Iranian claims of victory ring hollow

The announcement of a ceasefire in the war between Israel and Iran was as startling as the eruption of hostilities itself. The general sentiment among analysts was that the war would be a long and protracted one, given the ambitious goals the warring parties had set out for themselves.

The conflict reached a dramatic climax when Iran launched missiles at the American Al-Udeid Air Base in Qatar, triggering widespread fears that the Gulf states were on the verge of becoming battlegrounds in a war stretching from southern Israel to eastern Iran. Yet within hours, US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire—and even thanked Iran for providing Washington with advance notice of its decision to strike the base.

The announcement was surprising to anyone who had been closely following Trump’s statements and posture over the past 12 days. He had not only justified Israel’s surprise attack on Iran on 13 June—even though negotiations over Iran’s nuclear programme were ongoing and in fact scheduled for the next day—but he also greenlit a direct US strike on Iranian nuclear facilities without congressional approval.

Hours later, he floated the idea of regime change, after declaring the US had obliterated Iran’s nuclear programme. In a Truth Social post, he said: “It’s not politically correct to use the term, ‘Regime Change,’ but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn’t there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!”

The unprecedented destruction inflicted on Israel is certain to carry negative political consequences for Netanyahu

More questions than answers

As things stand now, there seem to be more questions than answers. The ceasefire terms are ambiguous, as they do not include any binding commitments for either the warring parties or the mediating parties.

From Israel's standpoint, it is unclear why Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu agreed to halt hostilities, fully aware that Iran's nuclear programme is still intact—as indicated by US intelligence assessments—and that his goal of regime change was not realised?

Meanwhile, the unprecedented destruction inflicted on Israeli cities, coupled with the enormous financial cost accrued by the war—both direct, in terms of military expenditures, and indirect, through the disruption of economic activity and public life—is certain to carry political consequences that may not play in Netanyahu's favour, despite the wartime surge in public support.

Standing alone

From Iran's standpoint, it will be assessing the feasibility of maintaining its once-dominant regional role, given that Russia and China chose to remain on the sidelines of the conflict, leaving Iran isolated on the world stage. And although Israel's attack on Iran was met with widespread condemnation both regionally and internationally, this did little to counter Tehran's increasing isolation—a self-inflicted wound due to its own policies over the past five decades.

Although Israel's attack on Iran was met with widespread condemnation, this did little to counter Tehran's increasing isolation

While it tried to position itself as a key player in the Islamic world, Iran has failed to cultivate enduring relationships with major powers. And in a telling sign of its declining regional influence, its regional allies—or proxies as its critics would call them—have been largely neutralised.

Despite years and sometimes decades of Iranian patronage, the militias it backed in Lebanon, Iraq and Yemen were unable to join it in its war on Israel. The defiant rhetoric spewed by members of the faltering 'Axis of Resistance' failed to mask the strategic collapse that began with the catastrophic error of October 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked Israel.

So as matters stand now, declarations of victory by both Israel and Iran ring hollow. Netanyahu didn't get his wish of regime change as the Iranian people did not rise up against their government, and Iran stood alone in its fight against Israel alone, with its 'axis' choosing to sit out the war despite spending billions to arm and train its fighters.

In the end, it seems that Trump—or rather Trumpism, with its reliance on ambiguity, surprise, and impulsive decision-making—is the only obvious winner of this war

font change