Egypt rejects Gaza administration offer with good reason

An Israeli politician said Cairo could have its huge debt pile disappear in a puff of smoke if it took on management and responsibility for Gaza. Here’s why it was right to say no.

Egypt rejects Gaza administration offer with good reason

Israeli opposition leader Yair Lapid’s recently dangled carrot appears attractive on the surface: Egypt takes over administrative and security affairs in Gaza in return for the erasure of its foreign debts.

It is a carrot because Egypt is one of the most indebted countries in the world. Public debt was around $140bn in December, or 90% of Egypt’s gross domestic product (GDP). This week, the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD) lowered Egypt’s 2025 economic outlook.

Last year, with its debt-to-GDP ratio at 96%, Egypt needed a $55bn loan-and-investment bailout, so the cancellation of its huge debt pile is tempting, but it has not accepted, and nor should it. This is fool’s gold—an Israeli attempt to give its neighbours responsibility for the problems in Gaza that its blitz-like bombing and destruction has created.

True, Lapid’s proposal does not displace millions of Palestinians to clear the way (literally) for US President Donald Trump to create his ‘Middle East Riviera’ (as Trump initially suggested) but it leads to the same result—ridding Israel of its Gaza security problem by dumping it in the region’s lap instead.

An unwanted Strip

Lapid’s suggestion for Gaza, if accepted, would mean that Israel could get away with rendering the territory uninhabitable, then avoid having to deal with the fact that millions of Palestinians can no longer live there. It would also roll the aspiration of a Palestinian state back 15 years at least.

Interestingly, Egypt has ruled Gaza twice before, taking military control of the Strip from 1948-56 and from 1957-67. Yet Egypt’s administration of the Strip during these periods served Egyptian and Palestinian interests. Doing so now would only serve Israel’s.

This is fool's gold—an Israeli attempt to give its neighbours responsibility for the problems in Gaza that it created

Hamas, the Islamist group that has ruled Gaza for almost two decades, remains a powerful (if diminished) force there, proving—since the current ceasefire with Israel took effect—that it will be a part of post-war Gaza, like it or not. 

Israeli attacks on its fighters, infrastructure, leaders, and tunnel network across Gaza have weakened Hamas, but not destroyed it. The group's military parades and shows of force at hostage-releases prove as much.

Furthermore, the scale of the destruction, both physical and human, is helping Hamas recruit. Egyptian administration of Gaza would therefore pit Egyptian personnel (whether soldiers or police) against Hamas, which considers any foreign troop presence in Gaza as a hostile gesture. 

Kicking Hamas out

Some Hamas officials have hinted in the past weeks also that the group might accept the idea of outsourcing the administration of Gaza's civilian affairs while it aims to regroup militarily, much like Hezbollah is doing in Lebanon. That idea is anathema to Tel Aviv and Washington, however. Both want Hamas gone in its entirety. 

With Lapid's proposal, Israel seems to be asking Egypt to do what the Israeli army has failed to do in more than 15 months of war: destroy Hamas. That is the mission that Egypt has categorically rejected.

Lapid's idea for an Egyptian administration of Gaza was mooted in an address to the conservative-leaning Foundation for Defence of Democracies in Washington on 25 February, just days after Arab leaders met in Riyadh to discuss an Egyptian blueprint for the reconstruction of Gaza.

They meet again today (4 March) emergency Arab summit in Cairo to discuss (and likely approve) the same blueprint, intending to send a message of Arab unity against the US-Israeli plans to depopulate Gaza. 

With Lapid's proposal, Israel seems to be asking Egypt to do what Israel's army has failed to do in 15 months of war: destroy Hamas

Egypt's plan proposes the three-stage rebuilding of Gaza, beginning in the south, followed by the central and northern regions. Safe-zones will be created where people will live in mobile homes, with electricity and drinking water. Debris will be removed to clear the way for reconstruction, from Rafah in the south up to Jabalia in the north, a process that Egypt thinks will take up to five years.

Israel's war motives

Questions remain over its financing and Gaza's future governance, especially with Hamas still in the picture. Egypt is reportedly pressing Hamas to retreat to gain Trump's imprimatur. Hamas will not want to, but it has limited friends. Most Arab states do not see it as part of Gaza's future.

If Hamas refuses, this could open the door for even more death and destruction, with Trump giving Israel the green light to resume the bombing, something Israel's far-right politicians incessantly advocate for. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu knows this could keep his governing coalition from collapsing, triggering elections that he does not want. 

Internal Israeli politics may therefore do more to end the current Gaza ceasefire than anything else, leading to the continuation of Tel Aviv's scorched-earth policy in Gaza, while complementing its gradual annexation of the West Bank. 

If they can establish who pays for the rebuild and what the Strip's governance regime involves, Egypt and other Arab states meeting at the summit in Cairo will have provided the first proof of Arab unity and determination to keep fighting this battle to the end. With that in mind, all eyes are on the Egyptian capital.

font change