Is 2025 the year Ukraine and Russia settle? It depends on the cost

Both sides are clambering to bolster their negotiating hand, but it may all hinge on NATO membership. A deal-breaker, says Putin. A must, says Zelensky. Let’s talk, says Trump

Is 2025 the year Ukraine and Russia settle? It depends on the cost

Nearly three years after Russian President Vladimir Putin launched his so-called “special military operation” against Ukraine, all the indications suggest the main priority in 2025 will be to bring hostilities to an end and negotiate a peace deal.

The impending arrival of Donald Trump to commence his second term as US president later this month has had a remarkable impact on all parties involved in the conflict, altering the approach adopted by both Moscow and Kyiv.

A man who prides himself on his good relations with Putin, Trump has boasted during the presidential election campaign that he would end the Ukraine conflict within “24 hours” once he had returned to the White House. Does he still think so?

Joe’s farewell arms

Trump and his Republican supporters have been highly critical of President Joe Biden and the outgoing US administration for their military and financial support for Kyiv since Russia launched its invasion in February 2022.

The US Congress has approved $175bn in assistance for Ukraine since the invasion, according to the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget.

Biden is using his final days in office to ramp up Washington’s support for Ukraine before Trump takes office, announcing nearly $6bn in additional military and budget assistance at the end of December.

“At my direction, the United States will continue to work relentlessly to strengthen Ukraine’s position in this war over the remainder of my time in office,” Biden said.

The new money will give Ukraine “an immediate influx of capabilities that it continues to use to great effect on the battlefield and longer-term supplies of air defence, artillery, and other critical weapons systems,” he said.

Averse to escalation

Biden’s desperation to provide Ukraine with as much support as possible before he leaves office was prompted by concerns that Trump will dramatically reduce American backing for Kyiv once in power. Trump has already criticised Ukraine’s use of US-supplied missiles for attacks deep into Russian territory.

In an interview with Time magazine published in December, Trump said: “It’s crazy what’s taking place. It’s crazy. I disagree very vehemently with sending missiles hundreds of miles into Russia. Why are we doing that? We’re just escalating this war and making it worse. That should not have been allowed.”

The US Congress has approved $175bn in assistance for Ukraine since the invasion

In November, Biden lifted restrictions on the use of long-range US missiles provided to Ukraine to conduct attacks deep within Russian territory, which the Ukrainians say is vital to their ability to resist Russian attacks.

Biden lifted the restrictions following pleas from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, who argued that Russia had escalated the conflict significantly by deploying 15,000 North Korean troops on the battlefield.

There are now concerns in Kyiv that Trump will re-impose the restrictions once he takes office, thereby limiting the ability of Ukrainian forces to withstand further Russian attacks, and scale down US support for Ukraine, as he instead concentrates his efforts on ending the conflict.

Working up a plan

Trump will get support from his fellow Republicans, who will control both the House of Representatives and the Senate, and who share his reservations about maintaining US support at its current level.

The Trump team is reported to be working on an outline peace proposal for ending the war, with advisers—including retired Lt. Gen. Keith Kellogg—suggesting that Ukraine be forced to the table by threats of cutting off US aid. 

Also mooted was a 20-year freeze on Ukraine's bid to become a member of the NATO alliance, and the deployment of a European peacekeeping force composed of British and European troops in eastern Ukraine.

Trump has not been specific about his peace plan but now concedes that ending the war in Ukraine could prove more difficult than solving the Middle East conflict.

Yet while he remains committed to negotiating a settlement, he also insists that he has no intention of abandoning the Ukrainian cause by forcing Kyiv to give up territory seized by Russian forces. "I want to reach an agreement, and the only way you're going to reach an agreement is not to abandon (your allies)," Trump said.

Comes down to NATO

Zelensky has made NATO membership a key part of his own peace proposals as he seeks to persuade the West to provide credible security guarantees against any future acts of Russian aggression. But membership will be fiercely opposed by Putin, and contentious for some major Western powers.

Trump's fellow Republicans, who will control the House and Senate, share his reservations about maintaining US support at its current level

Apart from concerns that Ukraine's governmental structures fall far short of the standards required for NATO membership, Western leaders are reluctant to provide the Ukrainians with the vital Article Five security guarantee that commits them to help Kyiv militarily if Russia attacks it again. 

Such a move could provoke all-out war between Russia and NATO, raising the prospect of a nuclear confrontation, but membership is clearly key. The Kremlin justified its invasion of Ukraine by arguing that it had to prevent Ukraine from joining NATO (even though there were no plans for that to happen).

Sergei Lavrov, the country's long-standing foreign minister, has been critical of proposals floated by Trump's team, while denying that Moscow had any details.

"We are not happy, of course, with the proposals made by members of the Trump team to postpone Ukraine's admission to NATO for 20 years and to station British and European peacekeeping forces in Ukraine," he said. 

Lavrov called for "reliable and legally binding agreements that would eliminate the root causes of the conflict and seal a mechanism precluding the possibility of their violation".

Facts on the ground

With Trump's stated desire to end hostilities in Ukraine, both sides in the conflict are intensifying their efforts to gain an advantage in the run-up to talks, hoping that this will strengthen their hand in negotiations.

On Christmas Day, Russia launched a major attack against Ukrainian infrastructure energy system, which Zelensky described as "inhuman".

At the same time, the Ukrainians are still inflicting mass casualties on Russian forces, especially against units seeking to recapture territory in the Kursk region captured by Ukrainian forces during a surprise attack in August.

This led North Korean soldiers to bolster Russia's war effort, but they too have suffered mass casualties, with 1,000 of their troops killed or wounded in recent days alone, according to White House spokesperson John Kirby.

"Russian and North Korean military leaders are treating these troops as expendable and ordering them on hopeless assaults against Ukrainian defences," Kirby said, describing the North Koreans' offensive as "massed, dismounted assaults".

The momentum of the Ukraine conflict may be moving towards a peace settlement once Trump takes office, but there is no guarantee that talks will result in a lasting resolution of this conflict. He will need to be at his deal-making best if this war is to end in 2025. 

font change