The entire credibility of the United Nations Security Council is at stake as it considers how best to respond to the escalating violence between Israel and Hezbollah. The UN’s ability to have any meaningful impact on the violence that has erupted between Israel and Iranian-backed groups such as Hamas and Hezbollah has been extremely limited since the October 7 attacks.
Despite passing numerous resolutions since the attacks took place, as well as publicly criticising Israel’s uncompromising military involvement in the Gaza conflict, which is said to have so far claimed in excess of 40,000 Palestinian deaths, the UN’s ability to influence events on the ground has been almost non-existent.
On the contrary, previous UN efforts, such as last year’s General Assembly resolution calling for an immediate and sustained ceasefire in Gaza, made little impact on the violence. One of the main criticisms of the resolution was that it failed to condemn Hamas for carrying out the 7 October attacks, which the Israelis used to justify their continued military operations in the enclave.
More recently, demands by the UN that Israel end its occupation of Palestinian territories in the occupied West Bank have similarly fallen on deaf ears, with the Israeli military, together with militant settler groups, continuing to conduct attacks in the area.
Under pressure
Now, with the recent upsurge in violence between Israel and Hezbollah raising the very real prospect of a broader conflict in the Middle East, the UN is under intense pressure to demonstrate that it can, after all, be a force for good in a turbulent world.
In the latest diplomatic effort to prevent the conflict from escalating, the United States, France, and some of their allies have called for an immediate 21-day ceasefire between Israel and Hezbollah while also expressing support for a truce in Gaza.