The US and Iran are using Gaza ceasefire talks as a stalling tactic

Washington wants Iran to have a face-saving reason why not to attack Israel for two 'red line' assassinations, while Iran wants to avoid having to do so. Any lack of progress in the talks is secondary

The US and Iran are using Gaza ceasefire talks as a stalling tactic

Since Israel’s double assassination of top Hezbollah military commander Fouad Shukr in Beirut and Hamas political chief Ismail Haniyeh in Tehran, the Gaza ceasefire talks have taken on a new urgency.

The hope is that a deal could prevent retaliation from the Iran-led ‘Axis of Resistance’ by giving Iran and Hezbollah a diplomatic ‘win’ that could serve as a face-saving measure for their non-response to these high-profile killings.

The assassinations, both attributed to Tel Aviv, crossed previously established ‘red lines’, necessitating a response, but if a ceasefire deal is within touching distance, it would justify and explain why an axis vengeance mission was not forthcoming.

Spouting false hope

Following the resumption of talks on 15 August, US officials up to and including President Joe Biden have been systematically fed misleading information about the prospects of a breakthrough. This contrasts starkly with the reality on the ground.

Hamas and Israel continue to trade blame over who is responsible for obstructing a deal, but what has been overlooked is how these negotiations are being used by both the US and Iran to buy time.

Washington’s reasoning—that a deal could prevent Iranian-led attacks on Israel—does not lack credence. Indeed, it was confirmed by three senior Iranian officials to Reuters, in an interview published on August 13.

While Hamas and Israel trade blame, what has been overlooked is how these negotiations are being used by both the US and Iran to buy time

In response, the US ramped up its shuttle diplomacy to secure a deal quickly, as its officials continued to spread misleading and misplaced optimism about the imminence of a breakthrough.

"We are closer than we have ever been" to a ceasefire in Gaza, said Biden, despite neither Hamas nor Israel concurring.

Rhetoric and reality

A senior Hamas official told the BBC there had been no progress and that the US was "selling illusions".

Israeli officials echoed this scepticism, also clarifying that no progress was being made, but the US, Iran, and Iran's allies all seem content with this as a fig leaf to cover their military inaction.

Despite the vocal threats issued by Iranian officials, both Iran and Hezbollah seem reluctant to follow through on their revenge vows.

The US, Iran, and Iran's allies all seem content with this as a fig leaf to cover their military inaction

Interestingly, Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) officials have tried to justify their inaction by framing it as part of a strategy to keep their adversaries on edge, presenting the delay as a form of punishment.

Yet no matter how they spin it, Iran and Hezbollah are caught between a rock and a hard place. They are damned if they act and damned if they don't, hence their temptation to buy into the "illusion" being sold by US officials.

Just say it's all fine

Negotiations for the sake of negotiations are not new to either the US or the Middle East. A clear example is the UN-led negotiations between the Syrian regime and the opposition in Geneva.

The constitutional committee, the core of the process, has not met for over two years, and yet everyone—including the US—still pretends that the negotiation process is alive and well.

The issue with stalling tactics such as the ceasefire negotiations is that they can trade a temporary sense of relief for a distorted worldview. Eventually, this false sense of security fades, leaving only a painful, sharp reality.

font change