Saudi cinema’s blockbuster year still leaves room for improvement

Filmmakers are being adventurous, and production quality is superb, but the tendency to over-indulge has lessened the impact of some Saudi films. Still, the future is bright.

The Saudi film industry had a blockbuster year but there is room for improvement.
Lina Jaradat
The Saudi film industry had a blockbuster year but there is room for improvement.

Saudi cinema’s blockbuster year still leaves room for improvement

By any standard, Saudi Arabia’s cinema industry has had a blockbuster year.

The number of Saudi short- and full-length films screened across the country’s multiplexes has risen, and Saudi entries in international festivals have been registered.

Saudi Arabia marked its maiden entry into the Cannes Film Festival with Norah, a drama by Tawfik al-Zaidi that is set in the Kingdom in the 1990s.

Ambition and vision have never been in short supply in the country, and Saudi creatives and studios are getting better at translating their ideas into hits on the big screen to please a growing audience with entertainment of all kinds.

Yet it is a mixed picture. While production is up and movies made in the Kingdom cover new themes explored on screen by new actors, the quality of the acting and the scripts can be lacking.

Hits of the year

Several hits have helped spark a lively dialogue across the industry about what works and there is a determination to make a mark on the wider world of cinema, with growing awareness that some things can be done better.

Highlights include Mohamed Al Salman’s Raven Song, a surreal exploration of a young man navigating a love story amid feelings of alienation and loneliness.

Meanwhile, Ali Kalthami’s compelling Night Courier depicts a working-class youth who is drawn into the world of crime by selling alcohol.

Many critics have praised the attention to detail and careful character development that is fast becoming a hallmark of Saudi filmmaking.

Writers, directors, and actors are now prepared to test boundaries, break taboos, and explore new territory, which is a welcome change.

In the past, the Saudi artistic landscape could feel one-dimensional and safe. Movies felt superficial, without ever daring to tackle big social issues. It all lacked depth.

Saudi Arabia marked its maiden entry into the Cannes Film Festival with Norah, a drama by Tawfik al-Zaidi that is set in the Kingdom in the 1990s.

The films that studios had wanted to showcase at festivals struggled to connect with audiences, who simply didn't buy into the story or the characters.

Films either felt immature or over-complicated, as if trying to be too intellectual.

Acting performances

Thankfully, Saudi cinema seems to be finding a new way, helped in part by young talent and actors from the near-extinct theatre scene who move into movies and help lift the quality of performances on screen.

Several have shone in these new roles. Mohammed Aldokhei was splendid in Night Courier which helped it impress critics and keep audiences spellbound.

Adawa Bader stood out in Naga with a telling depiction of her character in Meshal Al-Jasser's cinematic soiree.

Likewise, Asem Alawad earned viewers' sympathy in Raven Song through a serene performance of resilience in the face of life's challenges. Not all acting performances met the desired standard, however.

Some popular actors simply played the same character they have before, while veteran actors failed to deliver authentic performances. Instead of elevating the script's shortcomings, they accentuated them.

Crowded narrative

A common shortcoming of Saudi cinema has been the tendency to try to squeeze in several key themes then do a disservice to all, rather than focus on one and do it right.

As a result, filmmakers often struggle to maintain narrative cohesion. Audiences soon get confused as the storyline jumps between plots and irrelevant characters are introduced.

A common shortcoming of Saudi cinema has been the tendency to try to squeeze in several key themes then do a disservice to all.

While the ambition of commendable, as is the filmmaker's commitment, the film inevitably falters in the rush to deliver all the messages. Whatever initial clarity of vision there was often dissipates.

This comes down to the script writing, editing, and reviewing. Editorial oversight sometimes appears to be lacking. Whereas all superfluous scenes, characters, and plots would normally be stripped out in this process, here they are not.

In Night Courier, for instance, the sub-plot involving alcohol trafficking is introduced too late into the film's runtime, which impacts on character and plot development.

In Raven Song, the tendency to delve into surreal and theatrical scenes do not propel the film forward. Rather, they slow the pace and consume excessive time.

Naga, in particular, struggled in this regard. Despite a captivating start and stunning cinematography, the film grappled with narrative confusion, before eventually finding stability. On the silver screen, less can be more.

A bright future

Yet while these are areas for improvement, Saudi cinema is rapidly evolving. Every year seems to herald big advances, not least in terms of production capabilities.

There is no shortage of platforms for showcasing these Saudi cinematic experiments.

If filmmakers can learn to hone the theme, the story, and the characters, there will be yet another giant leap forward.

The rush to cram everything in can be interpreted as a fear that the freedom they have been given in filmmaking will not last long.

It is as if the collective Saudi creative space thinks that the current cultural and financial openness towards cinema will not endure.

Such a change appears unlikely, but if they are to rush, let them rush to tell a simple story brilliantly, rather than a complex story cinematically.

The latter may look good, but it will not linger. The best stories stay with the audience long after they leave.

font change

Related Articles