Gaza war: Definitions of victory and lessons from history

Both sides will rush to claim victory, and any notable failures or losses will be downplayed as merely a "setback" in an ongoing war that has spanned for decades

Gaza war: Definitions of victory and lessons from history

It's conceivable that both Israel and Hamas will claim victory following Israel's war on Gaza.

However, what Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu regards as a "victory" may not be necessarily seen as a "defeat" by Hamas. Their differing perspectives stem from deeply rooted historical, geographical, and power dynamics.

Examples from history

Reflecting on the Arab-Israeli conflict's history offers insight.

Following the 1967 war, Israel occupied the West Bank, Jerusalem, the Gaza Strip, the Golan Heights, and the Sinai Peninsula.

Weeks after the conflict, Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser declared, "The enemy did not meet its objective of land occupation. Its true aim was to crush the Arab Revolution and extinguish Arab Hope." He affirmed, despite the Sinai's occupation, "The revolution persists. We vowed to fight, to reclaim our nation, and to free Arab territories."

Nasser passed away without Sinai's liberation. His successor, Anwar Sadat, alongside Syrian President Hafez al-Assad, engaged in the 1973 October War. Following interim agreements, Sadat regained Sinai through the Camp David Accords in the late 1970s.

The late Syrian Foreign Minister Ibrahim Makhous, reflecting on the aftermath of the 6 June 1967 War, in which Syria lost the Golan Heights, emphasised the resilience of their political movement despite territorial losses.

He stated, “It is not grave that we lose cities because the enemy’s goal was to eliminate the revolution," referring to the Baath Party's ascent to power in the 1963 "March Revolution."

Makhous, who fled Syria when Hafez al-Assad seized power in 1970, saw al-Assad engage in negotiations with Israel through the US, leading to the recovery of the devastated city of Quneitra in the 1974 “disengagement” agreement.

It is not grave that we lose cities because the enemy's goal was to eliminate the revolution.

Then-Syrian Foreign Minister Ibrahim Makhous

Another example is the Israeli war on Lebanon in July 2006. The country suffered extensive damage, and the conflict concluded with UN Resolution 1701.

This scenario has two dimensions: diplomatically, it involved the Lebanese army's deployment south of the Litani River and Hezbollah's withdrawal north — a goal not yet fully realised and currently subject to confidential talks under US auspices.

In actuality, Hezbollah has only increased its control over Beirut's decision-making institutions and expanded its political clout in Lebanon and beyond. It has done so while also adhering to the "rules of engagement" in southern Lebanon.

Since Hamas assumed control of the Gaza Strip in 2007, Israel has launched five wars on the enclave, marked by air strikes, casualties, and ceasefires. Following each conflict, Hamas declared its victory. In Gaza, Hamas's governance continues, contingent upon compliance with ceasefire terms and established "rules of engagement."

Existential battle

The stakes for this battle are high for both Hamas and Israel. 

The war in Gaza is a welcome distraction for Israeli Prime Minister Netanyahu as he faces domestic opposition and legal prosecution. His political and personal fate seems inextricably linked to the outcome of this war.

The Hamas attack shattered the view that Israel could provide safety and security for its own citizens. The scale of the attack was unprecedented since 1948 and challenged Israel's image as a 'safe haven' for Jews.

Netanyahu's political and personal fate seems inextricably linked to the outcome of this war.

For Hamas, the situation is equally grave.

Netanyahu has vowed to dismantle Hamas's structure and restore Israel's deterrence. Israel's aggression on Gaza has slaughtered 20,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children, and around 1.3 million have been displaced. 

Approximately 60% of the Gaza Strip has been destroyed, with reconstruction costs estimated to reach $40bn. The campaign has also led to significant casualties among Hamas leaders and members, tying the fate of the organisation closely to the outcome of this war.

Final phase

As it seems that the final phase of this war could be nearing, both Netanyahu and Hamas know the outcome could determine their respective futures.

Netanyahu will likely face court proceedings and investigations after the war. For Hamas, the outcome of this conflict could result in the emergence of a "new Hamas."

But no matter the outcome, both sides will rush to claim victory. Any notable failures or losses will be downplayed as merely a "setback" in a conflict that has spanned decades and will likely continue for many more.

font change