The signs of stalemate in Russia-Ukraine war

No decisive breakthroughs as the war rages on

The signs of stalemate in Russia-Ukraine war

With the Ukraine conflict reaching stalemate, with neither the Ukrainians nor the Russians seemingly capable of achieving a significant breakthrough, it is almost inevitable that Western policymakers should start thinking about ways to end the bloodshed.

For all the optimism that surrounded Ukraine’s long-planned summer counteroffensive to liberate areas of the country captured by their Russian adversaries, Ukrainian forces have failed to achieve the decisive breakthrough they sought.

Despite launching a series of well-coordinated attacks to liberate territory in both the east and the south of the country, the highly effective defensive positions established by the Russians, known as the Surovikin line after the Russian general who devised them, the Ukrainians have failed to make the type of decisive breakthroughs they achieved last year, when they recaptured the city of Kharkiv in the northeast and Kherson in the south.

The only tangible gains the Ukrainians have achieved so far this year is to challenge Russia’s control over Crimea, home to the Russian Navy’s Black Sea fleet. A series of daring raids and missile strikes against Russian naval targets in Crimea, including an attack on November 4 which inflicted severe damage on a brand new Russian warship, an Askold Project 22800 Karakurt-class corvette which was docked in a Kerch shipyard in occupied Crimea.

But while Ukraine’s clever targeting of Russia’s naval bases in Crimea has severely restricted its navy’s ability to operate in the Black Sea, elsewhere Ukrainian forces have made minimal progress, prompting General Valery Zaluzhny, Ukraine’s commander-in-chief, to acknowledge in an interview earlier this month that the conflict had now reached stalemate.

Despite launching a series of well-coordinated attacks to liberate territory in both the east and the south of the country, the Ukrainians have failed to make the type of decisive breakthroughs they achieved last year.

In an interview with The Economist magazine, Zaluzhny conceded that the conflict had become a bitter war of attrition, admitting that, in the five months since Ukraine launched an eagerly awaited counteroffensive, its troops had advanced only 17 kilometres through heavily fortified and mined Russian defence lines.

"There will most likely be no deep and beautiful breakthrough," the commander conceded. While arms supplies provided by the West had been sufficient to sustain Ukraine's war effort, they had not given Kyiv the ability to achieve victory.

Since the end of last year Kyiv has warned that it needed a serious upgrade in the military equipment being provided by the West, including long-range missiles, tanks and warplanes. But the reluctance of Western leaders to provide the weaponry has limited the Ukrainians's ability to break through Russia's heavily fortified defensive positions.

Even so, Zaluzhny said he was grateful for the weapons the Ukrainians had received. "They are not obliged to give us anything, and we are grateful for what we have got, but I am simply stating the facts," he said of Ukraine's Western backers.

Zaluzhny also conceded that the Ukrainians had underestimated Moscow's determination to continue the war despite suffering massive casualties on the battlefield. Recent US estimates believe Russia has lost 300,000 men since it launched its invasion of Ukraine in February last year.

The Ukrainian commander still believes it might be possible to achieve a major breakthrough on the battlefield if his forces achieve air superiority, which is a distinct possibility once they have received the long-promised US F-16 fighters, the first of which are due to arrive in Ukraine next year.

Since the end of last year Kyiv has warned that it needed a serious upgrade in the military equipment being provided by the West, including long-range missiles, tanks and warplanes. 

But with signs that war fatigue is developing among Western leaders who have previously backed the Ukrainian cause, especially after the recent eruption of hostilities in Gaza between Israel and Hamas, Kyiv could be running out of time to achieve its battlefield goals as efforts intensify to negotiate an end to the conflict.

In Washington, for example, Republicans have been blocking any further aid for Ukraine until President Joe Biden and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky present them with a clear strategy for winning the war.

A recent letter sent to Biden and signed by seven Republican members of the U.S. Congress warned, "The American taxpayers have become weary of funding a never-ending stalemate in Ukraine with no vision of victory." 

And a senior US official told America's NBC network that American and European officials have initiated discussions with the Ukrainian government about what possible peace negotiations with Russia might entail to end the war. The discussions are said to include the very broad outlines of what Ukraine might need to give up to reach a deal with Russia.

Responding to the report, Zelensky reaffirmed his stance that this was not the time to negotiate with Russia, and he also denied that any Western leaders were pressuring him to do so. "Everyone knows my attitude, which coincides with the attitude of Ukrainian society ... Today no one is putting pressure (on me to negotiate). For us now to sit down with Russia and talk and give it something - this will not happen."

Russia currently controls about 17.5% of Ukraine's internationally recognised territory, and the Ukrainians continue to insist they will not stop fighting until every inch of Ukrainian territory - including Crimea - is returned to Kyiv's control.

But with concerns deepening in the US and Europe about the West's ability to continue supporting Ukraine's war effort, Zelensky may soon find that he has no choice other than to consider how to bring hostilities to an end.

Moreover, any move prompted by the West to bring hostilities to an end in Ukraine could also have a knock on effect on the Gaza crisis, where many Western leaders similarly find themselves under pressure to implement a ceasefire. If the West can bring the bitter fighting to an end in Ukraine, then why not in Gaza?

font change