Gaza ceasefire must remain top priority at emergency Arab summit

The summit should also provide a unified vision for peace and stability in the region

Secretary-General of the Arab League Ahmed Aboul Gheit and Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud attend a special Arab leaders' summit in Riyadh on Israel's war on Gaza.
Reuters
Secretary-General of the Arab League Ahmed Aboul Gheit and Saudi Arabia’s Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan Al Saud attend a special Arab leaders' summit in Riyadh on Israel's war on Gaza.

Gaza ceasefire must remain top priority at emergency Arab summit

The emergency Arab Summit is taking place in Riyadh today, 10 November, amidst the relentless Israeli brutal onslaught on Gaza.

Observers will be looking at what Arab leaders will propose to quickly bring an end to the unfolding humanitarian catastrophe in Gaza, set the Palestinian-Israeli conflict on a steady course towards a permanent solution and bring about comprehensive peace in the Middle East.

This is certainly no easy feat, and it's important to be pragmatic about what can be achieved now and what can be achieved later.

Ceasefire should remain top priority

The most pressing task is to mobilise international pressure for a durable and sustained ceasefire. This isn't easy, given the staunch US position against a ceasefire.

Only recently did Biden get Israel to agree to "humanitarian pauses"— a position backed by the G7. Regrettably, without the US changing its position, a ceasefire does not appear to be likely anytime soon.

However, this doesn't mean that Arabs should give up in their quest. The official Arab position should continue to advocate for a ceasefire as a matter of principle. The saving of a single Palestinian life is worth some tactical flexibility.

Here, the Arabs will have to find ways to persuade Washington of the necessity of a ceasefire. How it will do so is up to the Arab countries both individually and collectively.

To this end, Arab leaders need to agree on the best way to pressure Israel and the countries protecting it in its brutal onslaught on Gaza.

AFP
This picture taken from the Israeli side of the border with the Gaza Strip on November 10, 2023, shows billowing smoke during the Israeli bombardment of the Gaza Strip.

Read more: Western governments and Gaza's graveyard of children

Without the US changing its position, a ceasefire does not appear to be likely anytime soon. However, this doesn't mean that Arabs should give up in their quest. The official Arab position should continue to advocate for a ceasefire as a matter of principle.

Justice for peace

Second, the summit must also look beyond dealing with the present tragedy. It should provide a vision for peace and stability in the region. And that will not be possible without comprehensive peace in which the interests of all regional parties are factored in.

The "Land for Peace" principle that has underpinned past efforts to achieve peace in the region is no longer enough. This may have been enough for Arab neighbours of Israel, but certainly not for the Palestinian people. Developments over the past years, and particularly the latest tragedy in Gaza, require that the guiding principle be "Justice for Peace".

This would mean full respect and balanced application of international law. First and foremost, the Palestinians should exercise their inalienable right of self-determination and establish a viable state of their own. Second, Israel should withdraw from all Arab territories it occupies.

AFP
An Israeli settlement, Nevi Yakov, in Occupied East Jerusalem. In the background is the Palestinian neighbourhood of Beit Hanina.

To this end, an updated international framework for comprehensive peace is needed. The principles and parameters of such a settlement will need to be ironed out and implemented at a late stage once Israel ceases its brutal campaign on Gaza.

The Palestinian and Israeli leadership will need the active support of the international community to reach such an agreement.

An effective Palestinian leadership needs to be empowered to deliver the aspirations of the Palestinian people, which requires not only supporting the Palestinian Authority but also preventing Israel from undermining it.

Israelis will also have to decide on the kind of state they wish to live in and accordingly choose the kind of government that will deliver it. What the recent events in Gaza have demonstrated to the Israelis is that their military might, buttressed with their technological prowess, is not enough to guarantee their security.

The summit should provide a vision for peace and stability in the region. And that will not be possible without comprehensive peace in which the interests of all regional parties are factored in.

Updated international framework

Agreement on an updated international framework for peace in the Middle East should not be complicated as a matter of principle. The Security Council and the Middle East Quartet have already issued numerous documents on this topic. All have been supported by the five permanent members, including the United States.

In this regard, the summit might find it helpful to adopt a road map comprising three consecutive and interlinked steps:

  • An immediate and sustained ceasefire

  • Provision of urgent and substantial humanitarian aid.

  • The implementation of concrete measures to foster hope for Palestinians both in Gaza and the West Bank.

To this end, there should be no decoupling of the fate of Gaza from that of the West Bank. The day after in Gaza is organically linked to the West Bank. Gaza and the West Bank should be dealt with in equal measure with the ultimate objective of ensuring progress towards establishing a Palestinian state.

Such measures could include providing international protection to Palestinians both in Gaza and the West Bank, a halt to all settlement activities, and, as a first step, transferring area B (22%), where the PA administers only civil matters, to area A (18%), where the Palestinian Authority (PA) administers civil and security matters.

 The day after in Gaza is organically linked to the West Bank. Gaza and the West Bank should be dealt with in equal measure with the ultimate objective of ensuring progress towards establishing a Palestinian state.

Reuters
People hold a banner, as protestors and trade unionists blockade BAE Systems Rochester, during a protest in support of Palestinians in Gaza, in Rochester, Kent, Britain, November 10, 2023.

The articulation of a vision for the future of the Middle East with the endorsement of an updated framework for comprehensive peace by the Security Council should include:

  • The principle of land for peace, as stipulated in Resolution 242.

  • A commitment to implement a two-state solution. The Security Council previously endorsed the idea in 2002 with Resolution 1397.

  • The normalisation of relations between the Arab states and Israel as stipulated in the Arab Peace Plan of 2002, which the Middle East Quartet  — which includes the United States — endorsed as far back as 2003.

  • Establishing a "regional security system"  that meets the concerns of all parties. This must be inclusive and comprehensive, not a politico-military arrangement directed at any regional party.

  • Holding an international peace conference (which the European Union has recently endorsed ( 26/11/2023).

Arab countries must refuse to discuss day-after scenarios for Gaza until Israeli military action comes to a complete halt.

They should also pursue their vision both at the United Nations and bilaterally at the international level and work on mobilising global public opinion to support the Palestinians. 

font change

Related Articles