Why is Erdogan’s hardened stance on Syrian refugees ignored?

Despite the fact that the policy of Syrian deportations began under Erdogan, Islamists push a skewed narrative that equates opposition to the Turkish leader with support for al-Assad

Why is Erdogan’s hardened stance on Syrian refugees ignored?

In the first round of the Turkish election, Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan received 49.52 percent of the vote, while the leader of the Republican People's Party, Kilicdaroglu, secured 44.88 percent.

Sinan Ogan of the Ancestral Alliance came in third with 5.15 percent of the votes. The extremely anti-Syrian refugees candidate was the kingmaker in the second round. He announced that he supports Erdogan, who ended up securing victory in the second round.

Setting aside alliances and internal Turkish politics, this article focuses on the Syrian issue, particularly that of Syrian refugees in Turkey and the presence of racist discourse that permeated election campaigns and the potential effects of this discourse on the post-election period.

Kilicdaroglu — known for his inflammatory rhetoric against refugees — led a campaign that used rhetoric that transcended racism, delving into the realms of hatred and incitement, even featuring advertisements advocating for the deportation of Syrians.

Although he managed to garner support from several high-ranking members of the parties involved in the six-party alliance, this inciteful rhetoric prompted some parties to pull out of the alliance.

After the first round of the elections — where no candidate managed to secure more than 50 percent plus one of the votes — the level of racist rhetoric against Syrian refugees intensified.

Turks have clearly become increasingly frustrated with the presence of three million refugees in the country of 85 million. So, it was only natural that it became a campaign issue in this election — leading to a notable shift in the style of discourse used by both candidates.

Syrians still back Erdogan despite campaign rhetoric and deportations

Despite this, a significant portion of the Syrian population in Turkey has expressed support for Erdogan. This includes those who have acquired Turkish citizenship and are eligible to vote (more than 130,000), as well as those who are not Turkish citizens but fear an uncertain future if Erdogan fails to secure the presidency.

Read more: Syrian refugees in Turkey express worry ahead of crucial vote

Some opinion leaders and influential figures — particularly Islamists — have called upon all Turkish citizens of Syrian origin to vote for Erdogan, emphasising that doing otherwise would favour the regime of Syrian President Bashar al-Assad.

However, it is important to recall that the policy of deporting Syrians began several years ago under the direction of Erdogan himself. In recent years, tens of thousands of individuals have been forcibly returned to Syria, despite the Turkish government's attempt to portray these actions as "voluntary" returns.

It is important to recall that the policy of deporting Syrians began several years ago under the direction of Erdogan himself.

Human Rights Watch has previously documented cases where returnees were arrested or coerced into signing deportation forms. Syrians who returned "voluntarily" have reported harsh treatment by Turkish authorities and the subsequent risk of arrest, torture, and enforced disappearances upon their arrival in Syria.

Meanwhile, daily campaigns of incitement against Syrians in Turkey continue, resulting in increasing incidents of violence without any fair trials against the perpetrators.

Additionally, hundreds of Syrians have been shot dead by Turkish "gendarmes" while attempting to cross the border, with no measures taken to hold the killers accountable or prevent future killings.

Approximately a year ago, Daria Yanik, the Minister of Family and Social Affairs in Erdogan's government, pledged to empty the country of Syrian refugees within a year, stating: "We will intensify our efforts and work tirelessly to ensure that there are no Syrians left on our land after 2023."

Just a few days ago, amidst the ongoing electoral battle, Turkish Foreign Minister Mevlut Cavusoglu announced that more than 550,000 Syrians had returned to their country.

He further stated that efforts were underway to accelerate the repatriation process — particularly those who had come from areas controlled by the Syrian regime.

However, he clarified that not all Syrian refugees would be sent back, as certain sectors in Turkey, such as agriculture and industry, require their labour.

When Erdogan was prime minister and running for president in 2014, he employed drastically different rhetoric about Syrian refugees.

He called on Turks to emulate the Ansar (helpers) in their support for Syrian Muhajirin (immigrants), drawing a parallel to the companions of Prophet Mohammed. Unfortunately, these sentiments expressed at the time have gone unheeded.

While it is true that the number of refugees in Turkey has doubled, and the Syrian crisis has dragged on, refugees should not have to suffer two-fold. They were victims when they fled their homes, victims when they were forced to return, and victims again when they are used as political pawns.

Skewed narrative

The discourse employed by Syrian Islamists — which labels anyone not supporting Erdogan as a backer of the Syrian regime or the racist programme of Kilicdaroglu — is a highly distorted narrative that misrepresents the past, present, and future. 

The discourse employed by Syrian Islamists — which labels anyone not supporting Erdogan as a backer of the Syrian regime — is a highly distorted narrative that misrepresents the past, present, and future.

While the dangerous rhetoric of the Turkish opposition towards Syrian refugees is no justification for Erdogan's hardening stance on the issue, it is important to reflect on Erdogan's positions in the Astana and Sochi political negotiation tracks.

During those negotiations, Erdogan encouraged the Syrian opposition to boycott the Geneva process and UN Resolution 2254, resulting in the Syrian revolution, which destroyed the country and the Syrian people continue to suffer from.

Additionally, it is important to recall how battles that were initially fought for the liberation of Syria were redirected solely to serve Turkey's security interests. Let's not forget that Erdogan deployed Syrians to fight on his behalf in Libya and Azerbaijan — conflicts that have nothing to do with the Syrian struggle.

Against the current political backdrop, it's unfortunate that Syrians are, once again, suffering as politicians play power games. The absence of an institution or voice advocating for their interests and rights further exacerbates their vulnerability. Furthermore, there are no clear indications of a just political solution in accordance with UN Resolution 2254.

It is disheartening to observe that the space for Syrians is shrinking. It is also frustrating to see Erdogan granted amnesty for his policies and rhetoric when others are not afforded the same privilege.

At the end of the day, it will be the Syrians that, once again, pay the price.

font change