Makkah pact: security for the region, and by the region

The message behind the newly-formed alliance is clear: the region is no longer content to rely solely on others for its security. It is taking matters into its own hands.

Makkah pact: security for the region, and by the region

At a time when the Middle East's map of influence and web of alliances seems to be in flux, the announcement of a mutual defence pact between Saudi Arabia, Türkiye and Pakistan has raised eyebrows. Is a new regional axis taking form?

Signed in Makkah, the NATO-esque agreement stipulates that any armed attack on one of the three states will be regarded as an attack on all three. The signatories maintain that the pact is defensive and directed at no specific country, yet its timing is hardly coincidental with the conflict between Iran and its regional allies on one side and the US and Israel on the other intensifying, putting the security of the Gulf, the Red Sea and the region as a whole in serious jeopardy.

Only days before the mutual defence agreement was signed, the Saudi Ministry of Defence announced the establishment of a Saudi-led multinational defensive maritime coalition. Fourteen states signed its founding declaration in Riyadh, with the stated aim of protecting maritime security in the region, safeguarding global trade routes, and securing energy supplies and shipping through the Red Sea, the Bab al-Mandab Strait and the Gulf of Aden.

The two developments cannot be separated, and the messages carried by these alliances are directed on several fronts. The clearest is aimed at Tehran and, through it, at its regional proxies. Since the outbreak of the US-Israeli war against Iran more than a year ago, Iran has attacked Saudi Arabia, other Gulf states and Jordan with thousands of drones, alongside ballistic missiles aimed at civilian and military installations. Tehran has also mobilised its militias in Iraq and Yemen against Saudi Arabia, closed the Strait of Hormuz and, through the Houthis, threatened to target Saudi vessels in the Bab al-Mandab.

The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most vital energy arteries. The Red Sea, meanwhile, is a strategic commercial route linking the Indian Ocean to the Mediterranean through the Suez Canal. It is therefore significant that the agreement between the three states explicitly emphasises the protection of shipping lanes. Their defence cooperation extends beyond land and into the maritime domain.

The newly formed alliances come with messages that almost certainly address Tehran, but could also be directed at Tel Aviv and Washington.

Targeted message

However, the message behind these alliances is not solely addressed to Iran. They could be aimed at sending a message to Israel, albeit indirectly. Relations between Türkiye and Israel are becoming increasingly strained, while Riyadh seeks to carve out room for manoeuvre between its relationship with Washington and its position on the war and the wider regional conflict. It stands firm on its insistence on progress towards the establishment of a Palestinian state before signing any normalisation agreement with Israel. 

The alliances could also be sending a message to the US, and this could be the most important message. As reports begin to emerge of a possible US-Iran deal over the Hormuz Strait, regional countries are experiencing the same anxiety they felt when US President Barack Obama reached a nuclear accord with Iran in the form of the JCPOA. Giving Tehran a free hand in the strait would damage the commercial and economic interests of countries across the region and beyond, while also running counter to the law of the sea. 

If Saudi Arabia, Türkiye and Pakistan succeed in turning the agreement into real military cooperation, its effects could reverberate across the region.

A security epiphany

In these circumstances, it becomes both understandable and necessary for US allies to forge partnerships and build regional capabilities that protect their interests. This need not imply a rupture with Washington or a rejigging of alliances, but it does reflect a determination that the security of these states should not be held hostage to decisions and settlements reached elsewhere.

If the three countries succeed in turning the agreement from a political document into real military cooperation, its effects could reverberate across the region. With Türkiye's strength as a NATO member, Pakistan's strategic and nuclear capabilities, and Saudi Arabia's political, financial, and geographical weight, the three countries could lay the foundations for a deterrent architecture stretching from the eastern Mediterranean to the Gulf and the Arabian Sea.

From Makkah to Hormuz—and from the Gulf to the Red Sea—the message is clear: the region is no longer content to rely solely on others for its security. It is beginning to build security arrangements of its own.

font change