Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi had good reason to issue his latest appeal to US President Donald Trump to end the US-Israeli war against Iran. Nevertheless, his doing so raised eyebrows.
El-Sisi banked on Trump last year as Israel finally brought its ferocious war on Gaza to an end after two years of destruction. Although the US president saw eye-to-eye with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the Palestinian territory, he also wanted to be seen as a peacemaker.
On Iran, Trump is again in accord with Netanyahu on most of the war goals, including to enact regime change, to decapitate Iran’s military capabilities (including its ballistic missile programme), to end its support for regional proxies, and to bury its nuclear ambitions once and for all. Where they differ is on the economic future of Iran. Trump appears to want to appropriate Iran’s oil, but Netanyahu is on a mission to totally eradicate Israel’s regional adversaries, so he wants to leave Iran thoroughly decimated, oil included.
Seeking a solution
Trump’s answer at the Future Investment Initiative in Miami on 27 March to a question about the legacy he wants to leave behind suggests he is still interested in being seen as a peacemaker, and his recent rhetoric on Iran suggests he is looking for an exit, albeit one cloaked in victory.
Whether el-Sisi’s plea can offer him this kind of transactional exit depends on whether the Iranians still have anything to fear from losing in the event that the war drags on. This is being discussed by regional actors, including Egypt, which has spent the past five weeks trying to stop the bombs and drones.

El-Sisi talks to Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian, Russia’s President Vladimir Putin, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, and Gulf leaders such as Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman and Qatari Emir Tamim bin Hamad Al Thani. His foreign minister talks to counterparts from Iran, the US, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, and Qatar.
Egyptian intelligence officials have even opened communication channels with Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), thought to have ultimate authority over decisions of war, and Lebanon’s Hezbollah militia. All these contacts can help build consensus on a formula for ending the war—one that seeks to save face, and which benefits the Gulf states that have paid such a heavy price for a war they were not party to.

