Mashal’s comments suggest a strategic pivot by Hamas

The veteran Palestinian politician has changed the rhetoric over the Gaza war and seems to be aligning more closely with Türkiye and Arab states, at the expense of Iran and the Muslim Brotherhood.

Mashal’s comments suggest a strategic pivot by Hamas

Since Israel’s war on Gaza began in October 2023, the prevailing narrative promoted by Hamas and other factions aligned with Iran has been that the conflict was unfolding in-line with the strategic calculations of Gaza’s astute leaders. Across the wider media ecosystem aligned with the Muslim Brotherhood, the battle in the Palestinian enclave was being framed as an overwhelming victory for Hamas, with doubters dismissed as treacherous or conspiracists.

Yet in his most recent interview, Khaled Mashal, a Palestinian politician who serves as Hamas’s political representative abroad, described the Gaza war as “genocidal”. It was the first implicit admission of the war’s outcome from a senior Hamas figure. A reluctant and belated acknowledgment, it signalled that the era of sweeping military analyses extolling the Gaza factions’ superhuman capabilities has finally come to an end. Judging by Mashal’s comments, the narrative that replaces this ‘victory’ rhetoric focuses on the widespread destruction of Gaza and on Israel’s occupation of 60% of it.

Having to adapt

The interview reflects the new power dynamics impacting Hamas and reshaping its rhetoric, an evolution mirrored across the wider Muslim Brotherhood. The populist discourse over Gaza that dominated the past two years was unsustainable. Mashal has recently expressed appreciation for Saudi Arabia’s efforts to advance the Palestinian cause by encouraging international recognition of Palestine. He also thanked Jordan and Egypt for their opposition to displacement policies.

Mashal now recognises that aligning Hamas messaging with either the Brotherhood or Iran only serves to undermine it, rather than strengthen it. Likewise, it knows now that hostility towards Arab governments yields no tangible benefit. A veteran Hamas politician with far more experience than many of his peers, Mashal is wise to the currents, and his latest appearance signals a pivotal shift not only in Hamas’s media rhetoric but also in its political orientation, towards a more formal stance.

Several Muslim Brotherhood leaders have echoed Mashal’s view that the movement must reposition itself, more closely aligning with Arab states. For its part, Iran appears to be turning inward and shows little appetite for new regional ventures. Its influence has declined after sustaining repeated setbacks, including Israeli and US airstrikes. As a result, Tehran is reassessing who it supports and how, weighing the consequences.

Mashal now recognises that aligning Hamas messaging with either the Brotherhood or Iran only serves to undermine it, rather than strengthen it

Seeking to reassure, Mashal said he had no intention of interfering in the internal affairs of any Arab state, a marked departure from the past, when Hamas has appealed directly to Arab publics during the war, its military spokesman Abu Obaida even calling for attacks on American interests. Such appeals were made in vain, though. Hamas's predictions of sweeping upheaval across the Arab world not unlike the aftermath of the 1948 war (which triggered a series of coups and political shifts) did not come to pass.

Hamas's new friends

Mashal's comments therefore signal a shift in alliances. He has said that future guarantees could come from Türkiye and Qatar, which puts clear distance between Hamas and the former 'Axis of Resistance' coalition spanning the Iranian state and militias in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Gaza, and Yemen. Mashal even went so far as to declare that Gaza was no longer expected to bear the burden of resistance; it has already sacrificed more than its fair share. The priority now, he said, was reconstruction. Gazans love life, he said, repeatedly referencing the popular base throughout his remarks.

His message seemed aimed at the broader Palestinian public, delivered in a tone that reflects concern over Hamas's waning popularity given the war's devastating impact on Palestinian communities across multiple regions. It also suggested that Mashal would now take on a more prominent role within Hamas's political leadership, a notable shift from the period when former Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar was alive.

Addressing state officials, Mashal's language is measured and tailored, sidestepping the kind of revolutionary rhetoric that some Brotherhood members once assumed would spark popular unrest in Arab states. This new discourse shows that Hamas is distancing itself from the Muslim Brotherhood, too.

Like Iran, it has been strategically dropped. Perhaps the brothers are beginning to realise that they are increasingly out of step with the region's evolving dynamics. In Tehran, meanwhile, the penny seems to be dropping that the costs of supporting far-flung militant groups now outweigh the benefits.

font change