After Gaza comes the war of narratives

As soon as the Gaza ceasefire came into effect, the 'axis' launched a gaslighting campaign against anyone who dared to challenge its narrative

After Gaza comes the war of narratives

The war on Gaza has ended...for now. Both Israel and the Islamic Resistance Movement, Hamas, have acquiesced to the terms put forward by US President Donald Trump. The cessation of hostilities is, in itself, a cause for relief—despite the staggering losses suffered by the Palestinian people in Gaza.

We have seen the devastation wrought upon the Strip and heard the voices of its residents once the guns fell silent. This was the costliest war Palestinians have endured in decades. While holding Israel accountable for its atrocities is a moral and humanitarian imperative, Hamas must also be held to account for its missteps.

It knew when the guns fell silent that the day of reckoning would come, so it was already prepared. As soon as the ceasefire came into effect, it launched a campaign of denunciation and intimidation against anyone who dared to challenge its narrative. The same is true for Iran and its 'axis of resistance', which sustained crippling setbacks in the region.

Gaslighting campaign

This is a calculated campaign aimed at gaslighting the lived experience of the region over the past two years, as if campaigns of distortion and vilification could somehow paper over the sheer scale of loss and suffering that civilians—especially the Palestinians in Gaza—endured.

Arab states that opposed the displacement of Palestinians were maligned. Those who called for a ceasefire from the outset were accused of capitulating to Israel. Journalists—particularly women—were threatened by media figures aligned with the 'axis', all in an effort to construct a false narrative of heroic resistance and eternal victimhood.

The 'axis' is engaged in a calculated campaign of gaslighting the lived experience of the region over the past two years

But such distortion campaigns cannot change the facts nor turn mass loss into triumph. I have been writing on Arabs' long history of masking of defeat—from the 1948 Nakba (catastrophe) and 1967 Naksa (setback) to the so-called "divine victory" that Hezbollah declared over Israel in 2006. Each defeat is followed by a campaign of internal repression against those who reject the populist narrative.

To be clear, political or even armed resistance is not inherently populist. What is populist, however, is the behaviour of the 'axis of resistance' since such resistance became sectarian—each movement tied to a particular denomination and carrying out Tehran's agenda.

Blatant double standards

Turning resistance from a means to a noble end into an end in itself is among the gravest betrayals of the Palestinian cause. The stark contradictions and double standards of the 'resistance axis' mustn't be allowed to ossify into an accepted narrative or political reality.

Just weeks ago, Hamas condemned President Mahmoud Abbas's call at the UN General Assembly to disarm. Today, its position has bent. Weeks ago, Hamas waged a fierce campaign against Abbas for urging the release of hostages as a condition to end Israel's assault on Gaza. Today, it has complied.

The 'axis' wrongly believes that campaigns of distortion and vilification could somehow paper over the sheer scale of loss and suffering that civilians endured

Weeks ago, Hamas issued a statement condemning Abbas's insistence on excluding the movement from governance, describing it as "an infringement on our people's right to self-determination and an unacceptable submission to foreign agendas." Today, it has accepted precisely that. And the list goes on.

This tactic is also being used by Assad loyalists in Syria. When Damascus negotiates with Israel for a security arrangement or even comprehensive peace, it is branded as betrayal and submission, but when the 'axis' negotiates, it is hailed as strategic wisdom. If Hamas thanks President Trump, it is labelled political shrewdness, but when Syrians do the same, it is called surrender.

This double standard must be challenged with courage and clarity. The Palestinian cause is much bigger than Hamas and one's position on Hamas is entirely distinct from one's stance on the justice of the Palestinian struggle.

font change