Five lessons for Israel after October 7

Trump's ceasefire has ostensibly put an end to hostilities in Gaza, but still leaves key questions about the "Palestinian problem" unaddressed

Five lessons for Israel after October 7

The ceasefire agreement that US President Donald Trump clinched just days after the two-year mark of the Gaza war has ostensibly put an end to hostilities, but still leaves key questions about the "Palestinian problem" unaddressed.

To fully appreciate and analyse the repercussions of October 7, 2023, and Israel's subsequent war on Gaza is too much for one article to fit, so I will compress my insights into five key lessons—namely for Israel—to absorb.

1. Tactical successes do not always translate into strategic victories

Throughout the years, Israel has struggled to translate military achievements into political-strategic wins. Israeli foreign policy is reactionary and focused on beating back its enemies. It isn't based on a coherent and forward-thinking strategy.

The framework of the current ceasefire agreement—with its subsequent stages of implementation still unclear—had already been agreed to by Hamas many months ago. But Israel's unwillingness to understand and accept this and agree to a practical—albeit imperfect—alternative to Gaza governance leaves Hamas as the only player in the Strip, and it has already begun reasserting its control there.

Israeli foreign policy is reactionary and focused on beating back its enemies. It isn't based on a coherent and forward-thinking strategy.

2. The peace agreements with Egypt and Jordan survived...but barely

These peace treaties have impressively proven their strategic resilience. However, had Israel succeeded in carrying out a second Nakba by pushing Palestinians in Gaza into the Sinai and/or annexing the West Bank, it is hard to imagine these treaties would have survived.

Israel's commitment to these peace agreements is no longer evident to Egypt and Jordan. Israel's readiness to take them for granted endangers their resilience and makes for a flimsy foundation for future ties.

3. Global patience with Israel is wearing thin

The French-Saudi initiative—which succeeded in garnering broad international support, including recognition of a Palestinian state by key countries that had not done so before—is vital. But ultimately, a two-state solution will need Israel's buy-in, and that is something that a vast majority of Israelis oppose. It is also something that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has sworn he won't let happen.

During Trump's grand ceremony celebrating the Gaza ceasefire and his Middle East Peace Plan in Sharm el-Sheikh, there was no mention of a plan for two states. But Israel must not be misled by the decoupling that many nations have adopted between their national interests and the Palestinian issue: the message is, "this is your problem," and the failure to solve it carries dangerous long-term consequences.

And as the world's patience wears thin, Israel could one day wake up and find itself totally isolated. The near-total walk-out of delegates during Netanyahu's United Nations speech last month provides a stark preview.

4. Israel's absolute dependence on the US is untenable in the long run

The Israeli-American strategic relationship has, over the years, created a situation where Israel has become totally dependent on the United States. This wasn't always the case, but today, Israel not only finds itself completely reliant on US support, but specifically on Republican support, the long-term implications of which are highly problematic.

5. Absent a responsible leadership, citizens must step up

The Palestinian "problem" is not one that can be wished away. Its resolution could lead to normalisation and integration with regional countries, instead of the status quo, where Israel largely stands alone.

But given the total absence of a responsible, brave, and far-sighted Israeli leadership, its citizens will need to forge a more realistic and responsible vision for themselves.

font change