Netanyahu's Doha strike shows he isn't interested in peace

With Israel’s strike on Doha, Netanyahu appears intent on pursuing the path of armed conflict. Meanwhile, Hamas refuses to surrender.

Netanyahu's Doha strike shows he isn't interested in peace

Qatar has long played the role of mediator in regional conflicts, particularly between Hamas and Israel. It has also mediated between the Taliban and the US. Yet, Qatar has now been directly targeted twice. Days ago, Israel carried out a strike in the heart of Doha, targeting the Hamas negotiating team. Two months earlier, amid its war with Israel, Iran launched missile attacks on the US Al-Udeid Air Base.

The shift from mediator to target has provoked widespread shock and condemnation. Yet amid the madness and criminality unleashed since October 7, reasoned voices persist. They continue to stand against Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s criminality, Hamas’s intransigence, and Iran’s escalating ambitions.

As Hamas and its hardline supporters criticised regional negotiations and normalisation with Israel, the UN General Assembly adopted the ‘New York Declaration’. This declaration emerged from an international conference co-hosted by Saudi Arabia and France at the UN in July, aimed at addressing the protracted conflict and providing a roadmap towards a phased ceasefire and a two-state solution.

Netanyahu, however, favours military solutions. With Israel's overwhelming military superiority, war remains his preferred course of action. The price Israel pays is minimal compared with the devastating toll exacted on the Palestinians, and its brazen strike on Doha did not encounter significant domestic opposition. Today, Israel rejects peace, turns its back on diplomacy, and even targets those striving to mediate.

Qatar's shift from mediator to target has provoked widespread shock and condemnation

War-hungry and emboldened

Israel seeks war. Netanyahu thrives on perpetual conflict, rushing headlong to avoid accountability and secure his grip on power. Furthermore, he is emboldened by unwavering US support and Israel's unmatched military superiority. Yet the question remains: what does Hamas want?

Since the catastrophic Operation Al-Aqsa Flood, Palestinians have borne an immense cost for what was, at best, a reckless gamble. In its aftermath, Hamas has responded to every emerging ceasefire proposal with uncompromising demands, even when the most moderate plan called for a return to the pre-October 7 status quo.

Meanwhile, Netanyahu has seized the moment as a golden opportunity to eliminate anyone he perceives—rightly or wrongly—as a threat to Israel. His arrogance appears boundless, with little regard for international law or norms. Under the guise of October 7, he now seeks to redraw the region's map.

Netanyahu sees a golden opportunity to eliminate anyone he deems a threat to Israel

'No blank cheque'

Shortly before Israel's strike on Doha, Hamas political bureau member Basem Naim responded to US President Donald Trump's Gaza peace proposal with a defiant statement: "Gaza is not Japan, and the leadership of Hamas is not the Emperor of Japan. We will not sign a blank cheque."

Naim seems to have forgotten what Japan has become today. He also overlooked the fact that when Japan's emperor chose surrender, he spared his nation and people from further ruin. At that moment in history, Japan stood no chance against the combined power of the US and the Soviet Union.

Today, we face two competing projects. One is the path of political resistance, carried forward by Arab and international efforts to impose a two-state solution—a long and difficult road, perhaps, but one that could ultimately deliver a sovereign and viable Palestinian state. The other is the path of continued armed resistance, whose bitter fruits we witness daily under the crushing weight of Israel's military superiority and the unshakable support it receives from Washington.

The irony is that both Netanyahu and Hamas appear to prefer the second path.

font change