The history of tariffs is still being written

A US federal court has blocked Trump's tariffs and ruled that the president doesn't have unilateral authority to impose them, dealing a major blow to his economic policy

Sara Padovan

The history of tariffs is still being written

Tariffs are the talk of the town, with US President Donald Trump having begun his second term by increasing them on both allies and economic rivals before temporarily pausing many of the higher rates until July to allow time for trade deals.

A tax or duty to be paid on a particular type of import or export, tariffs are far from new. They date back to the 15th century, to the discoveries of Christopher Columbus and the expansion of foreign trade by European states, whose economies relied on high tariff barriers to curb imports, which were associated with outward flows of gold and silver.

In the late 18th century, the Industrial Revolution in Europe brought about a significant shift in the function of tariffs. Industrial nations began producing and exporting more goods, and the advent of railways and steamships facilitated their sales abroad. This led them to lower tariffs for their trade partners. In contrast, countries in the early stages of industrialisation maintained high tariffs to protect their fledgling industries.

US protectionism

The United States was among the last nations to reject David Ricardo’s theory of comparative advantage—one of the pillars of classical economic thought. Instead, it embraced protectionism, most notably through the McKinley Tariff Act of 1890, which increased tariffs to protect domestic industries. As a percentage of the customs value of US imports, tariffs rose from 20.5% to 29%.

Ann Ronan Picture‬ ‭ Library‬‭ / Alamy‬ ‭
President McKinley, as a physician, dispensing strong‬‭ 'Tariff' medicine in the men's ward of a sanatorium.

In 1922, the Fordney-McCumber Tariff Act increased tariffs up to an average of 38%, and they rose again under the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act of 1930, up to 59% on more than 3,200 imported goods. This was an attempt to mitigate the fallout from the Wall Street Crash of autumn 1929. European countries and Japan responded by raising their own tariffs, accelerating the global spread of the financial crisis.

The Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act faced significant opposition. More than 1,000 leading economists, including the renowned monetary theorist Irving Fisher, signed a petition urging President Herbert Hoover to veto the law, with American industrialist and car manufacturing pioneer Henry Ford calling it “sheer economic folly”.

Free trade proponents blamed tariffs for worsening the Great Depression, during which world trade collapsed from roughly $3bn a month in January 1929 to just over $1bn a month by March 1933. Others, however, argued that the primary cause of the trade contraction was the global shortage of liquidity, not protectionism. Nobel laureates Paul Krugman, Maurice Allais, and Milton Friedman agreed.

Lowering trade barriers

In 1933, delegates from 66 countries gathered in London to seek a way out of the Great Depression by lowering trade barriers and stabilising exchange rates. The conference failed because countries that had abandoned the gold standard, such as the UK and the US, refused to peg their currencies at fixed nominal values, as demanded by nations that had retained the gold standard, including France.

In 1934, the US Congress passed the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act, granting the President the authority to reduce or increase tariffs by up to 50% from the Smoot-Hawley levels, in exchange for reciprocal concessions from other countries. The Roosevelt Administration subsequently signed trade agreements with 19 countries in Europe and the Americas, and the resulting tariff reductions boosted economic growth.

The McKinley Tariff Act of 1890 increased tariffs from 20% to 29% to protect domestic American industries

In 1945, the victors of World War II resolved to abandon the protectionism that had worsened the Great Depression, establishing the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) in 1947. Signed by 23 countries, its key aims included reducing tariffs, granting most-favoured-nation status to all signatories, eliminating quotas, curbing subsidies, and creating a framework for resolving international trade disputes.

GATT paved the way for the formation of the World Trade Organisation in 1995 (which now comprises 164 countries and covers more than 98% of global trade and GDP), yet it was just one of the new multilateral institutions to emerge in the post-war years. Some were designed to foster monetary cooperation, financial stability, and trade, chief among them the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF).

Dollars and gold

The Bretton Woods Agreement of July 1944 made the US dollar the main settlement currency for international obligations, because the US at that time accounted for over half of the world's economic output and gold reserves. The dollar's value was pegged to gold, and other currencies were likewise pegged to the dollar. Foreign gold reserves were stored in the US, which pledged to redeem them for gold at $35 an ounce upon request. 

Yet the system quickly showed flaws. One major issue was the Triffin Dilemma, outlined by Belgian-American economist Robert Triffin in the 1960s. It revealed a contradiction between maintaining global monetary stability and meeting the world's demand for US dollars, especially as America kept running current account deficits. Countries feared holding depreciating dollar reserves.

A second issue was the fragility of the dollar's gold peg. President Charles de Gaulle sent dollars to the US and demanded gold in return, which led President Richard Nixon to announce the end of dollar convertibility to gold in 1973, ushering in the era of floating exchange rates.

Sara Padovan

The third issue was the rising dollar, which made American exports less competitive. This led the US to invite the UK, France, West Germany, and Japan to sign the Plaza Accord in September 1985, in which they agreed to a coordinated depreciation of the dollar. This reduced America's current account deficit with Germany but not with Japan.

Some politicians called for President Ronald Reagan to revert to protectionism, an idea he firmly rejected in a November 1988 address, citing Scottish economist Adam Smith's description of protectionism as "folly". Those arguing for protectionism were simply advocating a form of isolationist nationalism, he said, before concluding that "more trade—not less—is the future."

Tariffs back on trend

On 2 April 2025, President Donald Trump announced tariffs of at least 10% on 184 countries and a 145% increase on Chinese imports. He justified this by claiming that the US was the wealthiest between 1870 and 1913, when it maintained high tariffs. He also accused trade partners of imposing unfair tariffs and manipulating their currencies.

Trump's economic plans are concocted together with economic advisor Peter Navarro, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent and Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers Stephen Miran. In November 2024, Miran published a lengthy article titled A User's Guide to Restructuring the Global Trading System, laying out a plan to rebalance US and global markets, inspired by the Plaza Accord of 1985.

The plan commits the US to protecting its allies' security and ensuring their access to American markets and consumers, in return for their support to manage a dollar devaluation, contribute to expanding and upgrading the US industrial base (either by purchasing American goods or by investing in US projects), and accept the replacement of existing US Treasury debt with new bonds.

Post-war multilateral institutions were designed to foster monetary cooperation, financial stability, and trade

The plan hinges on a trade war (by imposing unprecedented tariff hikes and threatening to withdraw US military protection to force bilateral trade deals) and the creation of a US sovereign wealth fund, comprising foreign currencies like the euro, yen, and renminbi, to intervene in foreign exchange markets and lower the dollar's value.

Trump's plan mirrors the Plaza Accord by seeking to stabilise the global monetary system through a steady dollar exchange rate, ensuring sustainable US exports, revitalising American industry, and reducing the trade deficit and public debt—both of which now pose serious threats to the US and global economies.

However, this analysis is flawed. The Plaza Accord worked because the participating nations were militarily dependent on the US. Today's context is different, and China is now the world's top goods producer.

Markets have their say

The dollar remains a challenge for the US, contrary to former Treasury Secretary John Connally's famous 1971 remark: "The dollar is our currency, but your problem." Americans want a strong dollar, but not too strong. Even if an agreement temporarily lowers its value (as with the Plaza Accord), it inevitably rises again as long as it is the world's reserve currency.

Trump justified his protectionist actions by claiming that the US was the wealthiest between 1870 and 1913, when it maintained high tariffs

Trump may have drawn inspiration from French economist Antoine de Montchrétien, who wrote in his 1615 book Treatise on Political Economy that "foreign traders are like pumps that drain a kingdom's pure essence… they're leeches feeding on the French body and sapping its best blood".

But the market's reaction led to a rapid Trump U-turn, given that his flurry of tariffs triggered a global stock market crash, evoking memories of the crashes of 1929, 1987, 2000, 2008, and 2020. Several countries, especially China, retaliated by raising tariffs on US imports by 125%, prompting fears that the trade war would soon involve currency manipulation.

The dollar dropped amid concerns that China would sell its dollars and US Treasury bonds, increasing the risk of a global recession and threatening America's role as a global safe-haven. Trump quickly suspended the tariff increases for 90 days for all countries except China, allowing for negotiations.

And in the most recent development, a US federal court has blocked Trump's sweeping tariffs, in a major blow to a key part of his economic policies. The Court of International Trade ruled that an emergency law invoked by the White House does not give the president unilateral authority to impose tariffs on nearly every country. Soon after the ruling, the Trump administration lodged an appeal.

The history of tariffs, it seems, is still being written.

font change