Trump tariffs ignite global recession fears

In one of the first major economic forecasts since the US president waged his tariff war, the IMF has downgraded growth forecasts, much to the chagrin of countries still reeling from past crises

Vito Ansaldi

Trump tariffs ignite global recession fears

As US President Donald Trump’s trade war reverberates across the world from the United States, the International Monetary Fund has begun to quantify the implications for the global economy. On 22 April, it released its projections for growth in 2025-26, which are among the first major forecasts to be published after Trump’s tariffs stoked fears of a global recession.

The IMF’s World Economic Outlook predicts that global growth will drop to 2.8% for 2025, down from 3.3%, the level identified at the last round of predictions made in January. For 2026, it now expects a 3% growth rate, also down from 3.3%.

These are steep cuts. The IMF said they represent a “reference forecast”, instead of its usual baseline forecast, implying that the numbers are likely to change under the influence of subsequent events. The IMF has now assessed the probability of a recession occurring this year at 37%, higher than its assessment in the October 2024 World Economic Outlook.

Its latest projections were based on information available as of 4 April, two days after US President Donald Trump announced a series of what he called “reciprocal” trade tariffs. They were aimed at almost every country and ranged between 10% and over 50%—the highest in over a century.

The highest were intended for China, Canada and Mexico, and more widely, crucial economic sectors were targeted. But after days of turmoil on the financial markets, these revised import levies were placed on hold for 90 days for all nations except China. After Beijing retaliated, Trump followed suit. The two largest economies in the world now have triple-digit tariffs on trade flows between them.

Reuters
US President Donald Trump during a bilateral meeting with Chinese President Xi Jingping during the G20 summit in Osaka, Japan, July 29, 2019.

Global economy reset

Whatever lies ahead, the extent of the IMF’s growth downgrade underscores the significant implications for the global economy as a full-scale international trade war looms.

Pierre-Olivier Gourinchas, the IMF’s chief economist, made the significance clear in a blog post: “The global economic system under which most countries have operated for the last 80 years is being reset, ushering the world into a new era. Existing rules are challenged while new ones are yet to emerge.”

He added: “Dense global supply chains can magnify the effects of tariffs and uncertainty. Most traded goods are intermediate inputs that cross borders multiple times before being turned into final products”.

The IMF made some of its biggest revisions for the US economy. It cut its growth forecast for the country by 0.9% to 1.8% for 2025 and by 0.4% to 1.7% for 2026. For its part, China’s growth is forecast to be 4% for this year and next, down by 0.6% and 0.5% respectively.

There is a growing consensus that neither country can afford to prolong the trade war. They both depend on each other. The US is China’s largest export market, and it relies heavily on imports from China. For his part, US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, widely regarded as one of the more reasonable voices in the US administration, has reportedly described the tariffs as unsustainable and stated that the current standoff must be defused relatively soon.

Nonetheless, the outlook remains highly unpredictable in line with Trump’s temperament. The outlook for the trade war, and the damage it may do, remains far from clear. Against this backdrop, Al Majalla examines the current state of affairs in and around the global tariff battle, as well as its implications for trade, geopolitics, and oil prices.

Major policy shifts are resetting the global trade system and giving rise to uncertainty that is once again testing the resilience of the global economy

IMF report

Emerging markets

Tariffs lead to higher prices and so stoke inflation. If the extent of Trump's so-called "reciprocal" import levies comes into force after the current pause, the IMF said some countries may keep interest rates higher in an effort to fight inflation. Such risks are particularly apparent for a range of emerging market nations and may lead to recessions in these countries.

The latest IMF World Economic Outlook said: "Worsening global financial conditions and broader disruptions to the system could trigger balance of payments crises in small countries with limited market access, high refinancing needs, and weak negotiation capacity.

"These risks may be amplified for commodity exporters amid a continued decline in commodity prices, particularly those for oil and copper, which typically serve as indicators of an impending recession by signalling a slowdown in industrial activity in importers, such as China."

Advanced economies

As for advanced economies, government spending is likely to face renewed constraints. The IMF said these countries, on average, are expected to tighten fiscal policy in 2025-26 and, to a lesser extent, in 2027.

It is also likely that the pace of interest rate cuts may change, with the looser monetary policy one way of mitigating the risk of recession, although at the potential cost of lifting inflation.

One major monetary policy maker, Joachim Nagel, the president of Germany's Bundesbank, told Bloomberg Podcasts that Europe is in a "stagnant situation." This is likely to result in lower interest rates in Germany and the euro currency area, where growth is forecast to slow to 0.8% in 2025 and 1.2% in 2026. Nagel said that Germany could enter a recession due to the tariffs. The IMF cut its growth forecast for Europe's largest economy to zero for 2025 and 0.9% for 2026, representing cuts of 0.3% and 0.2%, respectively.

A shrunken US economy?

Meanwhile, in the US, the likelihood of a contraction in the size of the world's largest economy is now considered more probable, according to forecasts from major banks, including JPMorgan and Goldman Sachs.

As the economic outlook darkens, Trump has been pressuring the leadership of the US central bank over monetary policy as the president tracks the impact of his tariffs. He has called on Jerome Powell, the chairman of the Federal Reserve, to up the pace of interest rate cuts to help address fears of a recession in the US.

Read more: Trump fires at the Fed. America's economy is collateral damage

Powell is not expected to comply, with inflation above the Fed's official 2% target at 2.4%. It has proved more stubborn than many policymakers expected in their effort to bring it down. And the tariffs are likely to further ramp up upside risks on consumer prices.

The Fed has operational independence from the US administration. Although the president appoints the chair, the top monetary policymaker in the country cannot be fired by the White House.

Monetary policy free from day-to-day political control is one of the main principles of the US financial system. It is also a major part of the international investment case for international investors in US assets. Any moves from the White House to test the case law relating to the potential dismissal of the Fed chair would likely have serious implications for the financial markets. Powell's current term is due to end in May 2026.

AFP
Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell speaks during a news conference following the September meeting of the Federal Open Market Committee on September 18, 2024, in Washington, DC.

Rising uncertainty

The trade war comes hot on the heels of two back-to-back global crises in the pandemic and Russia's invasion of Ukraine. The global economy has not entirely recovered from their long-lasting repercussions, and could experience similar symptoms due to the tariffs.

According to the IMF, "Major policy shifts are resetting the global trade system and giving rise to uncertainty that is once again testing the resilience of the global economy."

"Companies facing uncertain market access will likely pause in the near term, reduce investment and cut spending," said Gourinchas."

"Likewise, financial institutions will reassess borrowers' exposure. The increased uncertainty and tightening of financial conditions could well dominate the short term, weighing on economic activity, as reflected in the sharp decline in oil prices."

font change