Time to strike? Iran’s severed arms leave its head vulnerable

Hamas is all but destroyed and Hezbollah has been badly wounded, perhaps fatally. Meanwhile, the Houthis and the militias in Iraq have also been hit. Is Iran next?

Time to strike? Iran’s severed arms leave its head vulnerable

Israel’s former prime minister and defence minister Naftali Bennett once likened Iran and its armed proxy militias around the region to an octopus. By striking the proxies, Israel was only striking the octopus’s tentacles. He argued that Israel would do better to strike the head—Iran.

Israel is doing a good job of striking the tentacles, notably those of Hamas (in Gaza) and Hezbollah (in Lebanon). Others, like the Houthis in Yemen and some Iraq-based militias, have also been hit. Yet it is Hezbollah that has long been Iran’s most potent proxy. It has been accurately described as ‘Iran’s right arm’.

In recent weeks, Israel has taken out much of Hezbollah’s leadership, communications systems, and weapons. Not only was the group’s elusive long-serving Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah killed, but his most likely successor, Hashem Safieddine, is missing, also suspected to have been killed.

In the fury and fear, amidst the bombs and blackouts, rumours and conspiracies are rife. After Hezbollah’s communication devices exploded in a devastating security breach, fingers even pointed at Iran. According to the mutterings, Tehran “sold out” the group in secret negotiations with Israel and the Americans.

This theory emerged after Iran’s repeated assertions that it did not want to be dragged into a direct war with Israel, as evidenced by its perceived reluctance to retaliate when Hamas’s political leader, Ismail Haniyeh, was assassinated on Iranian soil in Tehran.

However, realistically speaking, these accusations against Tehran simply do not stack up. Iran has heavily invested in Hezbollah for decades. It is Iran’s most powerful and important tool. Why would they allow Israel to 'eliminate it'?

Chance to hit out

Perhaps Iran miscalculated. It seems that Hamas’s attack against Israel on 7 October 2023—and Hezbollah's decision after that to launch a “supportive war”—gave Benjamin Netanyahu his golden opportunity. The Israeli prime minister, deeply unpopular in Israel and at risk of being removed from power, saw in this attack a once-in-a-lifetime chance to defeat Israel's enemies and break Iran’s proxy encirclement.

When US President Joe Biden withdrew from the 2024 presidential race, Netanyahu knew that the White House's positions were no longer relevant until a successor was in place. He saw in this a green light to wage war.

Every blow to its proxy is a blow to Iran. Netanyahu intends to inflict as many defeats as possible before the US election.

He has done so. In the past year, Israel has decimated Hamas, is decimating Hezbollah, has blown up Houthi infrastructure in Yemen, struck military sites in Syria, assassinated the leaders of pro-Iranian militias based in Iraq, and bombed Iranian launch facilities. Most recently, Iran fired a flurry of ballistic missiles at Israel. At the time of writing, there had not yet been an Israeli response. But few doubt that there will be.

Looking back, it is clear that Tel Aviv's campaign to strike Hezbollah began on 8 October 2023, after the group began firing at Israel "in support" of Hamas. Israel has been killing Hezbollah fighters, particularly second-tier field commanders, for a year now. In recent weeks, it has intensified its campaign dramatically and decapitated the group by killing its leaders.

Time is of the essence

Every blow to a proxy is a blow to Iran. Having spent 30 years building Hezbollah into a formidable fighting force, Iran could only watch as it was torn asunder in a matter of weeks, having been shown to be thoroughly compromised. Those who think it can rebuild quickly are deluding themselves.

Netanyahu is on a roll and determined to inflict as many defeats on Iran as possible before the US election. Likewise, Iran is determined to exercise restraint to avoid any Israeli strike against "the head of the octopus" before the next White House resident is known.

Iran will hope that this is Kamala Harris and that her administration concludes that Tehran's new president holds sufficient sway and can be reasoned with. This would continue the idea established under US President Barack Obama that Iran's nuclear ambitions can be reined in through negotiation, with sanctions relief offered in return for compliance.

Netanyahu's race against time is not only to erode the remaining effects of the 'Obama Doctrine' but to establish a new reality that makes this doctrine impossible to reinstate. 

The wider picture

Iran also sees a plot to impose a new Middle East reality. In his Friday sermon, Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei said the West "is trying to turn Israel into a platform for exporting oil and gas to Europe, and a point for importing goods from Europe into the region".

Iran sees a plot to impose a new Middle East reality and knows the conflict with Israel is about regional hegemony

Khamenei understands that the conflict with Israel is a struggle for roles and functions over the region, not just a struggle within it.

For Iran to realise its dream, it must safeguard its internal stability and political system, which, in its view, requires nuclear weapons. To counterbalance the power disparity with Israel and protect its nuclear ambitions, Iran built up its proxies (arms) to defend it.

In this sense, Hezbollah's role was, in effect, to defend Iran's nuclear programme and prevent Israel from destroying it by mobilising tens of thousands of missiles along Israel's northern border. With the loss of Hezbollah, Iran is now vulnerable to attack.

Tehran's best hope is that it can hold on until 2025, when a different US president will restrain Israel. Yet Netanyahu knows that Iran is weak and that the time to strike is now. The region and the world will be closely watching what happens next.

font change