Why businessmen often make for bad politicians

After a run of badly handled crises, countries around the world sought non-politicians for stewardship, but most of these moves have backfired

Why businessmen often make for bad politicians

Recent research has found that public confidence in Western democracies has markedly declined. Professor Yascha Mounk, a political scientist at Harvard and Johns Hopkins University, attributes this to multiple perceived economic and social failures in governance. These perceived failures often prompt calls for leaders with different skill sets capable of implementing more effective policies.

This exercise in saviour-searching often turns to the business world to find problem-solvers who can handle the challenges that politicians have failed to overcome. This logic led to the choice of leaders such as Silvio Berlusconi in Italy, Bidzina Ivanishvili in Georgia, Sebastián Piñera in Chile, Thaksin Shinawatra in Thailand, Marc Ravalomanana in Madagascar, Patrice Talon in Benin, Moïse Katumbi in the Congo, Rafic Hariri in Lebanon, among others.

However, immediately, there are inherent contradictions. Can someone who spent their career pursuing private interests be an effective public servant? And more importantly, can they be trusted?

Operational limits

Businessmen who enter politics often step down from public roles after they realise just how restricted their operational capacity is in government. That was the case recently with Rex Tillerson, the former chief executive of ExxonMobil who served as secretary of state in the United States. Politics requires balancing myriad interests, whereas businesses often operate more like dictatorships.

Politics requires balancing myriad interests, whereas businesses oftentimes operate more like dictatorships

Risks are also perceived differently. Businessmen are wired to pursue policies that boost profits, and personal interests often trump public interests, as seen in the case of former US President Donald Trump, who gave huge tax cuts that benefited the wealthy, worsening the deficit and inflation rates. On the other hand, politicians have to take into account many other factors and responsibilities.

And people have been cognizant of the need to separate business and politics for millennia. In fact, renowned 14th-century Arab philosopher Ibn Khaldun warned of the dangers of business in politics, which he believed would lead to the corruption of both.

And while there are a few examples of businessmen who have excelled in politics—such as former deputy prime minister of the United Kingdom Michael Heseltine and billionaire Michael Bloomberg, the financial services and global media giant who served three terms as mayor of New York City—they are rare. 

Huge disappointments

However, most businessmen-turned-politicians have failed to live up to the expectations that brought them to power. A prime example of this is Lebanese billionaire Najib Mikati. He was asked to lead a government to rescue his country from a deep financial crisis, but his plan to write off a portion of every bank deposit over $100,000 turned out to be a huge failure.

Businessmen are wired to pursue policies that boost profits, and personal interests often trump public interests

Under pressure from the opposition, this proposal was amended in form but not in substance, suggesting instead that depositors be compensated for amounts above that with shares in the country's "zombie" banks or bonds maturing in two or three decades.

From the outset, Mikati's appointment was criticised by a wary public who knew of his family stake in a certain Lebanese bank. Additionally, he and his family had previously benefited from subsidised housing loans to purchase prime real estate in the most upscale areas of Beirut.

French President Emmanuel Macron is another example of how business savvy does not translate into political success. Despite his background in investment banking at Rothschild, his political popularity has taken a major nosedive over his perceived governance failures.

Safeguarding mechanisms

There should be mechanisms in place to safeguard the public from politicians deeply linked to the business world. Businesspeople who want to enter politics should be required to sign a fiduciary contract in which they relinquish their legal—not economic—right to manage and invest their financial assets to an accredited fiduciary.

These assets should be declared to a higher authority to ensure transparency, and the state should confiscate any financial largesse exceeding the company's average growth rate. This kind of transparency will help reassure the public about the business links of their politicians and make these leaders think twice about putting their personal interests over those of the public.

font change