Saddam Haftar: The nepotistic rise of a Libyan general

While he never underwent any real military training, he has been crucial to his father’s bloody power struggle. He is now being backed by a range of powers to be Libya's next leader.

Despite never finishing school, having no noticeable signs of charisma, and a political toolbox limited to blunt violence, Saddam Haftar is now being backed by a range of regional and international powers to be Libya’s next leader.
Harol Bustos
Despite never finishing school, having no noticeable signs of charisma, and a political toolbox limited to blunt violence, Saddam Haftar is now being backed by a range of regional and international powers to be Libya’s next leader.

Saddam Haftar: The nepotistic rise of a Libyan general

It was spring 2012, the height of Libya’s revolution against their dictator Muammar Gaddafi. As the intrepid revolutionaries trickled into Benghazi’s operations centre one morning, something was different. Clustered in a corner were a few surly young men sipping coffee, scrolling Facebook on their laptops.

Thinking they were perhaps new recruits whose zealousness allowed them to stumble into this sensitive location, the revolutionaries marched towards them to teach them a thing or two about operational security in wartime. An older officer blocked them: “Leave them alone, they’re General Haftar’s kids”.

General Khalifa Haftar—Gaddafi’s one-time co-putschist turned frenemy—had just returned to Libya, offering (in a very demanding way) to lead the revolutionary forces. So, his sons were to remain ‘inside the tent’ until issues with command were sorted. But the opposition to the general—who was then best known in Libya for crimes against his own people during the Chadian war of the 1980s—quickly grew. As it did towards his sons, who incensed those in the operations room by refusing to help. Instead, they aggressively flexed their impunity, spending all day browsing the net on insecure computers. Until, one day, smiles went round those same revolutionaries. They got permission to chuck out the Haftars.

One of these kids, Saddam, was not notably seen again until later that year. Amidst the chaos of the fall of Tripoli in October 2012, he was wounded trying to storm the al-Aman bank.

Almost 15 years later, that surly young gangster Saddam Haftar is a brigadier-general, chief of staff of the land forces of the Libyan Arab Armed Forces (LAAF).

Like most success stories of modern Arab politics, Saddam’s surprising rise is deeply rooted in nepotism. While he never went through any real military or officer training, he has been a crucial lieutenant to his father’s bloody power struggle—alternating between being a diplomat, a brutal suppressor of dissent, and overseeing an extraordinarily lucrative multinational business operation that smuggles everything from scrap metal to people.

This is why, despite never finishing school, having no noticeable signs of charisma, and a political toolbox limited to blunt violence, he is now being backed by a range of regional and international powers to be Libya’s next leader.

Harol Bustos

The Karama Kid

Having been unceremoniously rejected by the revolution, General Haftar left Libya, only meaningfully returning to Benghazi in 2014. Shooting amateur video from a military base, he launched “operation Dignity” (Karama in Arabic)—an operation painstakingly crafted to look like a local fightback against Islamist extremism. When it was really a multinational operation to return Libya’s chaotic revolutionary republic to a state of military authoritarianism.

What followed were years of messy, destructive, urban warfare before Haftar conquered Benghazi from a ramshackle alliance of revolutionaries, Islamists, extremists, and poor young men who had simply ended up on the wrong side of his conflict. Despite initially claiming he would retire after ‘liberating’ Benghazi, Haftar’s multinational coalition unsurprisingly pressed on to take the rest of eastern Libya, violently subduing the city of Derna through a series of foreign-supplied air strikes and a suffocating siege.

Haftar gradually traded the gun for gold and seized Libya’s lucrative oil crescent and eventually large swathes of southern Libya by promising key tribes’ prestige and riches if they became the local franchisee of the military enterprise he now presented as a national project.

While most attention during these years was on the battlefields in Libya, Saddam kept his father’s military machine lubricated with the weaponry, ammunition, financing and support it needed to proceed, cutting his teeth as an international operator. Saddam served as Karama’s de facto chief ambassador, managing the material support directed to his father’s campaign. According to the United Nation’s Panel of Experts responsible for investigating violations of Libya’s sanction regime, these military re-supplies were usually managed by obscure aircraft chartering companies.

As the military operations continued growing, so too did the amount of munitions and additional equipment required, as it became clear that Haftar would need overwhelming material superiority to win a war. So, Saddam had to start building additional procurement channels to supplement the largesse of his foreign partners.

As later confirmed by Haftar’s Airforce chief Saqr al-Jaroushi, it was Saddam who sourced the arms his father depended upon “from secret partners and foreign states” alongside his brother-in-law Ayoub el-Ferjani. And war is tremendously expensive. In early 2016, the parliament speaker, Aguileh Saleh, called for an investigation into Haftar’s diversion of state funds and material, given that the procurement was managed by his clan and distributed according to who was loyal to them.

Saddam Haftar never finished school, has no noticeable signs of charisma and a political toolbox limited to blunt violence

Once upon a time in Benghazi

At this time, Haftar's operation Karama was formally under what was dubbed the interim Libyan government appointed by the House of Representatives whose seat was in Tobruk, in Libya's far east.

The diversion of state resources along with Saddam extorting commercial banks to fund his procurement through locally issued debt were a growing cause for concern. Not just because of what was spent, but more because of what it had bought.

Three years into the war for Benghazi, Haftar had shed his 'counter-terror' pretensions: offering safe passage to Islamic State (IS) fighters towards western Libya but no surrender for Libyan opposition; Haftar's forces were detaining or intimidating parliamentarians, activists, judicial staff and anyone else of influence; and civilian mayors were being replaced by military governors.

This synched up with Saddam's gradual transition from Yuri Orlov impersonator to leading the domestic terror of Haftar's counter-revolution. Saddam was appointed de facto head of the Tariq bin Ziad (TBZ) brigade, largely composed of Madkhali Salafists who had fought on Benghazi's frontlines. This unit became Haftar's version of Gaddafi's feared revolutionary committees, making a spectacle of arresting and punishing anyone who publicly criticised the new regime. From TBZ's base at Sidi Faraj, east of Benghazi, Saddam has set up his own fiefdom. Here, he oversees a parallel prison system where he can not only violently re-educate civic activists but also put pressure on businessmen or members of prominent families for ransom.

Alongside his brother Khaled, he also helped institute the 106th Brigade, which operates as a de facto praetorian guard for the Haftars and is amongst the best-equipped units of the LAAF.

At the end of 2016, Saddam's military future was clear to see as he was pictured in a captain's uniform attending a military ceremony for LAAF recruits. Despite never attending a military college or spending any time on a battlefield, he was promoted to Major within a year. Soon after, a now clearly subordinated Aguileh Saleh humiliatingly appointed him a Lieutenant Colonel, as the seasoned military officers who had joined Karama at the start looked on in dismay and disgust.  

The road to perdition

At the end of 2017, Saddam Haftar marked the nominal end of the war in Benghazi in a similar way to the nominal end of the 2011 revolution by robbing a bank.

Having arrested the Deputy Interior Minister of the interim government, who was responsible for securing banks. Saddam used Brigade 106 to storm the Central Bank of Libya's eastern headquarters, trying to seize an estimated 640mn Libyan dinars, €159mn, $2mn, and almost 6,000 silver coins – though some of the cash was damaged beyond use after a broken pipe spewed sewage water around the vault.

Interestingly, it took only six months for the seized Euros to begin showing up in Europe, usually in the hands of those linked to mafias.

Khalifa Haftar de-fanged eastern Libya's tribes by removing anyone who could challenge him, allowing for Saddam's rise.

At this point, the rise of the Haftar's seemed inevitable. The Libyan Arab Armed Forces nominally controlled most of Libya's land mass; it had fully domesticated the national parliament, its international backing had swelled to include most major powers, and even the UN's 'national conference' designed to reboot Libya's political transition was bending to empower them. Then, Haftar decided to attack Tripoli.

Just over a year later, the LAAF was in disarray; its tribal support had melted, and many in the east were so aggrieved over the young men tricked into fighting with promises of a quick victory and plenty of plunder that Haftar had to stagger the return of body bags. Haftar and the LAAF as entities were saved by the Russian mercenaries his other backers had bought in to try to salvage the operation. Haftar had survived, but only just, and he was now entirely dependent on a Russian mercenary group.  

Despite his impressive rank, Saddam was mostly distant from Tripoli's battlefield. He was putting his talents to use elsewhere, maintaining the money supply needed to fund his father's war. Like in his previous conflicts, Haftar's army was undisciplined, prioritising destruction and outfiring their opponent. According to a Russian military analyst on the ground, LAAF fighters showed their unprofessionalism through "indiscriminate" fire. Keeping the LAAF profligate kept Saddam busy.

From the start of the conflict, two Ilyushin cargo planes arrived each day, carrying up to 500 tonnes of Russian munitions each. Occasionally, a French Air Force C-130 Hercules would also land in Benghazi, likely with more munitions for the forces besieging Tripoli.

To keep this multinational war machine liquid, as debt became harder to obtain due to the spiralling liabilities of eastern Libya's banks (which one day would almost crash Libya's entire banking system), Saddam tried to step up the activities of the LAAF's Military Investment Authority. This involved everything from stripping Benghazi's infrastructure and the rubble of his father's previous wars for scrap for sale, illicit sales of crude and fuel, and even taking over agricultural projects in Libya's south. By 2020, Saddam was even said to be organising flights of the Haftar's private jet to Venezuela, exchanging duffel bags of US dollars for gold to pay his creditors.

The family business

But all of this couldn't buy his father victory. With his army routed and recriminations high, Haftar had to consolidate. Saddam was naturally one of the main beneficiaries of his father's need to gather all military, financial, and strategic posts of the LAAF into his family's hands to prevent any potential challenger from gaining independent military means. This involved not only de-fanging eastern Libya's tribes by limiting their access to senior military roles and military equipment but also removing anyone who could challenge Haftar. This was exemplified in the assassination of Mahmoud el-Warfalli, once one of Haftar's most feared operatives in Benghazi, who had developed a cultish following and who needed to be removed for Saddam to subsume the city's remaining forces.  

From late 2020 Saddam gradually became recognisable as a new access point for the LAAF, and by extension eastern Libya. It wasn't just because he, along with his brother Khaled, had the remnants of the LAAF and all their weaponry firmly under his control. But also because of the international contacts he'd developed since 2014, and particularly his new Russian friends that would help supercharge his illicit economic activities.

In the spring of 2021, Haftar predictably broke relations with Libya's newly formed unity government to maintain the political division in Libya that he and his international backers required to remain relevant. But, with commercial bank branches in Libya effectively cordoned by the central bank to prevent further debts, he was in desperate need of financing. Saddam, alongside the then Wagner Group, would fill that gap. The Russian role in supporting this growth is deducible given how tightly it was tied to Russia's other regional ally, Bashar al-Assad, in Syria.

In the late days of the Tripoli war, Wagner forces had quietly abandoned their positions on the front to redeploy to key oil facilities. This helped Saddam to allegedly export small amounts of crude and to exert influence over eastern subsidiaries of Libya's National Oil Company (NOC), allowing him to increase fuel smuggling. Given the difficulties of putting smuggled Libyan oil or fuel on the global market, Syria also represented a useful new customer.

Harol Bustos

Going the other way are substantial amounts of cannabis and Captagon (an amphetamine allegedly manufactured by those close to al-Assad), which are distributed throughout Africa from ports in Tobruk and Benghazi. Alongside drugs, a burgeoning trade in people started with migrants from as far afield as Bangladesh being taken to Syria's Hmeimim airbase, then to Benghazi, and on to Europe.  

Alongside his growth in the shadow economy, Saddam also moved to take over more of what remained of the formal economy. Mimicking the model of the LAAF's military investment authority, he started the TBZ Agency for Services and Production. This agency sought to hoover up public sector money through contracts for state services from road maintenance and refuse collection to reconstruction of public buildings in cities destroyed by the LAAF.  He also used the power of the LAAF to push his way into key companies of eastern Libya, like the airline Berniq Airways and local commercial banks.

 Here, Saddam's brother Belgacem, who was building influence over the political institutions of eastern Libya, facilitated the TBZ agency's acquisition of as many government contracts as possible. The TBZ Agency also opened up further diplomatic channels for the Haftars, as Saddam leveraged subcontracting these lucrative projects to European and regional companies alike.

This blending of the economic and diplomatic with good old-fashioned violence is what would make Saddam the standout successor as his father continued ageing. Not only did Saddam lead the diplomatic push to try and get his father elected president during Libya's brief and doomed electoral period in 2021, he even travelled to Israel multiple times, promising to join the Abraham Accords if Tel Aviv lobbied for a Haftar presidency. On top of that, he deployed the TBZ to Sebha's court building in an effort to block the candidacy of potential rival Saif-al-Islam Gaddafi.

Then, in the summer of 2022, Saddam agreed to lift the LAAF's blockade on Libyan oil exports in exchange for replacing the long-serving head of the NOC with former Central Bank Governor Ferhat Bengadara. It was a move that took the final blocks off Libyan state corruption, facilitating the gradual breakdown of the NOC as new brokers for crude sales emerged, the system of transferring crude sales directly to the Central Bank was increasingly circumvented, and Saddam was able to take ever greater control of NOC subsidiaries, specifically those re-selling fuels.  

As the Haftars rule has deepened, so too has Saddam's terror. Not only are academics, activists, lawyers, and others being arrested, murdered, and intimidated, but other prominent personalities, like former defence minister Mahdi al Barghathi, who was assaulted alongside his family for simply returning to Benghazi, where he may have been considered a potential rival given his tribal and military roots.

Nowhere was the brittleness of Saddam's character and the shape of Haftar's rule clearer than in the city of Derna. In September 2023, a hurricane caused a long-neglected dam to burst, almost wiping out the city already devastated by the LAAF's previous war.

Saddam is a living manifestation of Libya's policy failures. His rise is not because he built anything but because a role needed filling.

Saddam's chaotic response, more concerned about maintaining control than helping survivors, only worsened what was already a catastrophe. When survivors protested and begged for help, Saddam hit hard, arresting swathes of people and gradually locking the city down. Months later, his brother, Belgacem, was appointed the Executive Director of the Reconstruction fund. Much like with the TBZ agency, he has used this as a political vehicle to secure foreign support with lucrative contracts while citizens suffer ever-worsening neglect.

Not the leader Libya needs, but the leader everybody else wants

As the head of the LAAF's largest force and the gatekeeper of access to Libya's main oil fields and export terminals, Saddam sits atop the house of cards that represents present-day Libya. Despite his reliance on Russia for force projection and on illicit activities to stay financially solvent, he presents enough of a strong-man illusion to continue drawing support. 

His control over migration flows has enabled him to domesticate Italy and other Europeans who once pursued a national political process. His role in charge of the TBZ has made him a conduit for American schemes to start building a unified Libyan force (despite the Russian paradox in place).

Saddam may have been an atypical revolutionary, but he typifies post-revolutionary Libyan politics and its international relations. Where convenience is prized over stability, and balancing the international web around Libya is the most important aspect of any Libyan political system.

Saddam is a living manifestation of Libya's policy failures since 2014. His success and his rise are not because he built anything but because a role needed filling. Karama's backers needed someone to manage their arms transfers. His father needed a Haftar to sit atop companies nominally. The Russians needed a local to work through to give their missions plausible deniability.

The only thing Saddam himself seems to have taken to—and excelled at—is violence. The illusion of Saddam as a strongman, a competent and independently powerful leader, only exists because that's what everyone dealing with Libya today wants. If that support were to change, his strength would evaporate.

But this policy only validates and strengthens the activities that got him to where he is and in doing so, brews future crises. The transition from Saddam the useful, to Saddam the problem, could be seen in early August 2024, where he shut down Libya's largest oil field, allegedly due to a slight from Europe after an arms shipment he tried to illicitly purchase from China (in a swap for oil) was seized.  

Saddam Haftar is likely to be anointed Libya's next leader, especially as his father ages badly. The ladders of international relations, proclivity for violence, and economic activity he's used to scale Libya's house of cards have given him a unique profile amidst Libya's political elite. But eventually, the House of Cards will collapse, the illusion of Saddam's strength will dissipate, and then the only question will be whether there is enough of Libya remaining to rebuild what those revolutionaries who first kicked him out of Benghazi hoped for.

font change

Related Articles