The mask slips: Syrian asset seizures are collective punishment

While Damascus jumps through hoops for its Arab peers, it is seizing money and property from those who once opposed the regime, even if they have since been through a ‘reconciliation’ process

The mask slips: Syrian asset seizures are collective punishment

Since its readmission to the Arab League in May of last year, Syria has made a point of responding to the demands of the Arab Ministerial Contact Committee, which was established to improve conditions in Syria, facilitate the return of refugees, and work toward ending the conflict.

The regime has announced changes to its security apparatus, revisions in its military service laws, and anti-drug raids. These act as mere façades, window dressing that yields no tangible improvements on the ground.

More troubling is the regime’s increased reliance on a series of legislative measures, issued since the beginning of the conflict, to collectively punish its opponents and their families, particularly evident in the Syrian Ministry of Finance's recent spate of unlawful asset freezes.

State’s seizure orders

Since the start of the year, hundreds of people have been targeted with asset freezes, violating their rights and obstructing refugees and displaced persons from returning to their homes.

A detailed report by the Syrian Network for Human Rights reveals that, in 2024, precautionary seizure orders were issued against 818 individuals in the town of Zakia, in rural Damascus, that was recaptured from opposition groups in 2016.

Notably, 287 of these 818 individuals currently live in Zakia after having previously undergone a reconciliation process with the regime, which should theoretically have ensured their protection from further retaliation.

Yet, as in other areas, these processes appear to have been used primarily for intelligence gathering rather than a genuine clean slate and protection.

Notably, 287 of these 818 individuals currently live in Zakia and have undergone a reconciliation process with the regime

Among the rest, 187 were internally displaced within Syria, 69 were refugees, 37 had been forcibly disappeared, 22 were missing, and 20 were deceased.

These precautionary seizure orders are grounded in Legislative Decree 63 of 2012, which allows the Finance Ministry to freeze assets based on requests from judicial authorities during investigations of "crimes against the internal or external security of the state" and under Syria's Counterterrorism Law of 2012.

However, the asset freeze decisions in Zakia were not issued by any judicial authority but rather stemmed from security decisions, underscoring the extensive powers wielded by the security apparatus, which controls all facets of state institutions and citizens' lives.

Collective punishment

Remarkably, these seizure orders have not only targeted individuals perceived as opposing the regime but also their immediate family, including parents, spouses, children, and siblings.

By penalising people based solely on their familial relationships rather than individual culpability, the Finance Ministry's implementation of Decree 63 amounts to collective punishment—a practice prohibited under international humanitarian and human rights law.

The indiscriminate nature of these mass asset freezes in Zakia reflects a broader strategy of collective punishment against communities in recaptured areas.

By weaponising counterterrorism laws to justify unlawful asset freezes, the government seeks to instil fear and maintain repression in formerly opposition-held territories.

Seizure orders have not only targeted individuals perceived as opposing the regime but also their immediate family members too

Beyond merely punishing its opponents, the regime is using these seizures to generate additional income.

The significant number of asset freezes in the relatively small town of Zakia since the beginning of the year directly follows the regime's enactment of a new law in late 2023 which grants the government the authority to manage and invest both movable and immovable confiscated assets. All revenue generated goes to the state purse.

Regardless of the underlying motives, these asset freezes (and the laws enabling them) cast a long shadow beyond the individuals directly affected. They create formidable barriers for refugees and displaced persons longing to return to their homeland.

The inability to reclaim their properties and rebuild their lives, compounded by escalating security risks, turns the prospect of returning home into a distant and unattainable dream.

This harsh reality endures even as Syrian refugees face growing hardships abroad, transforming their once hopeful journey home into a mirage fading on the horizon.

font change