Netanyahu won the applause of victors. Meanwhile, in Gaza…

The strong have always preyed upon the weak and been the ones left standing to take the adulation. If we simply acquiesce, where does that leave all our talk of morals, principles, and values?

Netanyahu won the applause of victors. Meanwhile, in Gaza…

It ever was that the world applauds the victor. Such was the welcome Israel’s prime minister got as he strode into Washington last week. Meanwhile, in Gaza, the killing continues, these days mostly in ‘safe zones.’

Since Hamas attacked Israel on 7 October 2023, Israel has waged a relentless war on the Strip and its residents. At the time of writing, the death toll was a numbing 39,300. Most have been women and children.

Despite this, American politicians who convened at the US Congress repeatedly and enthusiastically applauded Israel’s Benjamin Netanyahu last week, queuing up to shake his hand, giving him a hero’s welcome.

The two-state solution, once supported, remains just ink on paper, an idea quickly passing into myth. Only a few countries have recognised a Palestinian state. Indeed, the act of doing so now seems merely symbolic.

In a recent and unprecedented move, the Israeli Knesset (parliament) passed a resolution rejecting the establishment of a Palestinian state, challenging the international community to confront a new reality.

Facing facts

Some may argue that it is time to accept that there will not be an independent, sovereign Palestinian state, and that alternative solutions should be sought, with an emphasis on persuading the victor (Israel) to show mercy on the defeated.

If there is a shift towards realpolitik and the recognition of realities, then it is not just being seen in relation to Israel and the Palestinians.

A numbing 39,300 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza, mostly women and children, but US politicians queued up to shake Netanyahu's hand.

Seven European foreign ministers of nations that champion human rights, justice, and the rule of law sent a letter to the EU's foreign policy chief Josep Borrell urging Brussels to reconsider its policy towards Syria.

The letter, published by Al Majalla, acknowledged that the Syrian regime—backed by Russia and Iran—had regained control of about 70% of its territory, making a political solution in accordance with UN Resolution 2254 unattainable.

The ministers called on the EU to adopt a realistic approach, mirroring the pragmatic approach advocated for in dealing with the Taliban following the US withdrawal from Afghanistan in August 2021.

This recognised that the Taliban were the only game in town and enabled the nationalist Islamist movement to regain control and resume its oppressive practices against the Afghan people after a 20-year hiatus, a period in which Afghans had freedom.

Universal truths

It is not just Afghanistan. Almost everyone in Lebanon acknowledges the crimes of Hezbollah, including its role in the assassination of Rafik Hariri and dozens of Lebanon's finest citizens, as well as its war crimes in Syria.

The European ministers called on the EU to adopt a realistic approach to Syria, mirroring the pragmatism in dealing with the Taliban.

They also know that Hezbollah is why Lebanon has such strained relations with many Arab countries, particularly the Gulf states, in service of Iran. However, in Lebanon too, there is a prevailing demand for realism, regardless of the moral implications.

This raises a crucial question: Can we still write and talk about values, principles, justice, and equality while refusing to condemn those who kill and oppress other?

Soviet dictator Josef Stalin was once asked to soften his persecution of Christians so as not to anger Pope Pius XII. His reply is famous. "The pope? Oh no! How many divisions does he have?"

If, at the end of the day, it just comes down to power, to 'facts on the ground', to how many divisions you have, then perhaps we should all just stop pretending that being in the right matters.

font change